We detected 97 companies using Drone CI and 2 companies that churned. The most common industry is Software Development (33%) and the most common company size is 2-10 employees (35%). We find new customers by discovering URLs with known URL patterns through web crawling or modifications to subprocessor lists.
Note: We track companies that are using Drone CI in a public Github repo. We also track companies using Github as well here
Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 97 companies that use Drone CI
Company Characteristics
i
Shows how much more likely Drone CI customers are to have each trait compared to all companies. For example, 2.0x means customers are twice as likely to have that characteristic.
Trait
Likelihood
Industry: Software Development
17.3x
Industry: Technology, Information and Internet
16.0x
Industry: IT Services and IT Consulting
7.5x
Company Size: 51-200
2.8x
Country: United States
2.4x
Company Size: 11-50
2.0x
I noticed that Drone CI users fall into three distinct categories: open source technology companies building developer tools and infrastructure (VTEX, MongoDB, Nextcloud, Teleport), software development agencies serving diverse clients (Fivium, Pixel Point, Vivify Ideas), and a surprising number of blockchain and Web3 companies (Yellow Network, Casper Association, Consensys, imToken). What they share is a heavy focus on building complex software products that require robust CI/CD pipelines.
These companies span the full spectrum of maturity. I found post-IPO giants like The New York Times and MongoDB alongside tiny 2-10 person teams like Feedbin and Drone.io itself. However, the sweet spot appears to be Series A through Series C companies with 50-200 employees (Teleport, SpotDraft, MoEngage). Even the larger enterprises here tend to be tech-forward organizations rather than traditional corporations.
🔧 What other technologies do Drone CI customers also use?
Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 97 companies that use Drone CI
Commonly Paired Technologies
i
Shows how much more likely Drone CI customers are to use each tool compared to the general population. For example, 287x means customers are 287 times more likely to use that tool.
I noticed that Drone CI users are almost exclusively infrastructure-focused engineering teams practicing modern DevOps at scale. The massive correlation with Helm, Terraform, and multiple CI platforms tells me these are companies running sophisticated, cloud-native operations where automation and infrastructure-as-code are core to their engineering culture. They're likely building complex distributed systems that require advanced deployment orchestration.
The pairing with Helm and Terraform is particularly revealing. These companies aren't just deploying applications, they're managing entire Kubernetes clusters and cloud infrastructure programmatically. Drone CI fits perfectly into this workflow because it allows engineers to define CI/CD pipelines as code in containers, matching the declarative infrastructure approach they're already using. The strong correlation with Verified Github Organizations suggests these are established engineering teams with mature development practices and likely open source involvement.
What really stands out is the presence of multiple CI tools like Github Actions, Travis CI, and Gitlab CI alongside Drone CI. This isn't redundancy. It signals that these teams are either migrating between platforms (experimenting with alternatives) or running polyglot CI environments where different projects need different tools. They're sophisticated enough to recognize that one size doesn't fit all in continuous integration.
Alternatives and Competitors to Drone CI
Explore vendors that are alternatives in this category