Companies that use Hetzner

Analyzed and validated by Henley Wing Chiu
All devops Hetzner

Hetzner We detected 15,894 companies using Hetzner. The most common industry is IT Services and IT Consulting (16%) and the most common company size is 2-10 employees (56%). We find new customers by discovering URLs with known URL patterns through web crawling or modifications to subprocessor lists. Note: We only track companies that use Hetzner for backend services (for their API, applications, monitoring, etc). We do not track companies that host their marketing website on Hetzner

⏱️ Data is delayed by 1 month. To show real-time data, sign up for a free trial or login
Company Employees Industry Country Region Usage Start Date
0343.eu source 2–10 N/A N/A Europe
07131.net source 2–10 N/A N/A N/A
0G source 51–200 Technology, Information and Internet
KY KY
North America
0l.de source 2–10 N/A
DE Germany
Europe
0rbsystem.xyz source 2–10 N/A N/A N/A
0x90.space source 2–10 N/A N/A N/A
0xequity source 2–10 Investment Management
US United States
North America
0xhacked.com source 2–10 N/A N/A N/A
0xminds.com source 2–10 N/A N/A N/A
0xwork.org source 2–10 N/A N/A N/A
1000.menu source 2–10 N/A N/A N/A
10a.io source 2–10 N/A N/A N/A
Sign In Scheduling (acquired by Sign In App) source 11–50 Software Development
GB United Kingdom
Europe
112tech.ro source 2–10 N/A
RO RO
Europe
11academianetworks.com source 2–10 N/A N/A N/A
123mediaplayer.com source 2–10 N/A N/A N/A
123pc.nl source 2–10 N/A
NL Netherlands
Europe
123tanken.de source 2–10 N/A
DE Germany
Europe
12punto source 11–50 Internet News
TR Turkey
Europe
13ug1mb.com source 2–10 N/A N/A N/A
Showing 1-20

Market Insights

🏢 Top Industries

IT Services and IT Consulting 1492 (16%)
Software Development 1392 (15%)
Technology, Information and Internet 824 (9%)
Advertising Services 438 (5%)
Information Technology & Services 362 (4%)

📏 Company Size Distribution

2-10 employees 8824 (56%)
11-50 employees 4212 (27%)
51-200 employees 1629 (10%)
201-500 employees 561 (4%)
1 employee employees 208 (1%)

📊 Who usually uses Hetzner and for what use cases?

Source: Analysis of job postings that mention Hetzner (using the Bloomberry Jobs API)

Job titles that mention Hetzner
i
Job Title
Share
DevOps Engineer
41%
Backend Engineer
16%
System Administrator
9%
Systems Engineer
6%
I analyzed 70 job postings mentioning Hetzner and found that 100% are individual contributor roles, with DevOps Engineers making up 41%, Backend Engineers 16%, System Administrators 9%, and Systems Engineers 6%. This tells me that Hetzner purchases are driven by hands-on technical teams rather than executive leadership. The buyers are typically senior-level individual contributors who have budget authority over infrastructure decisions. These teams prioritize cost optimization, hybrid cloud strategies, and maintaining control over their infrastructure rather than relying solely on hyperscalers like AWS or Azure.

The day-to-day users of Hetzner are primarily DevOps engineers and backend developers managing production workloads. They're deploying containerized applications on Kubernetes, setting up CI/CD pipelines, managing bare-metal servers alongside cloud resources, and running databases like PostgreSQL, MongoDB, and ClickHouse. Many postings mention Hetzner in the same breath as AWS, indicating it's used as part of multi-cloud strategies where teams mix hyperscaler services with Hetzner's cost-effective dedicated and cloud servers.

The pain points driving Hetzner adoption center on cost efficiency and control. I noticed phrases like "cost optimization while strengthening monitoring," "scalable, high-performance systems," and "manage servers on platforms like Hetzner and AWS." Companies are looking for alternatives to expensive hyperscaler pricing while maintaining enterprise-grade reliability. One posting explicitly mentioned "optimizing cloud costs," while another highlighted managing "infrastructure across datacenter dedicated servers and cloud providers," revealing that Hetzner serves as a pragmatic middle ground between full cloud and on-premise infrastructure.

👥 What types of companies use Hetzner?

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 15,894 companies that use Hetzner

Company Characteristics
i
Trait
Likelihood
Country: Ukraine
14.6x
Country: Germany
11.4x
Country: Estonia
11.0x
Funding Stage: Convertible note
8.1x
Industry: Data Infrastructure and Analytics
6.1x
Funding Stage: Angel
5.8x
I noticed that Hetzner's customers are predominantly builders and makers in the digital space. These are companies creating software products, web applications, e-commerce platforms, and digital services. They range from dating apps like Fika and Lyoubov to AI-powered tools like Rojeek and Hyperengage, from e-commerce development agencies to SaaS platforms like LimeSurvey and Splynx. Many are agencies providing digital services to other businesses, whether that's web development, digital marketing, or IT consulting.

These are overwhelmingly small to mid-sized companies, typically in the 2-50 employee range, with a handful reaching 50-200. Very few show funding information, which suggests they're bootstrapped or organically grown rather than venture-backed. They're past the garage-startup phase but haven't reached enterprise scale. Many have been operating for 5-15 years, indicating they're established but still growing. The German concentration is notable, with many European companies overall.

🔧 What other technologies do Hetzner customers also use?

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 15,894 companies that use Hetzner

Commonly Paired Technologies
i
Technology
Likelihood
70.5x
66.4x
61.8x
56.6x
49.1x
30.7x
I noticed that Hetzner attracts companies with a distinctly technical, self-managed infrastructure philosophy. The overwhelming presence of tools like N8N, GitLab, and Portainer tells me these are engineering-first organizations that prefer building and maintaining their own systems rather than buying SaaS solutions. They're choosing infrastructure-as-a-service over platform-as-a-service, which suggests they have strong technical teams and value cost efficiency over convenience.

The pairing of GitLab with Jenkins is particularly revealing. These companies are running their own CI/CD pipelines rather than using GitHub Actions or CircleCI, which means they want complete control over their development workflows. When you add Grafana and Zabbix for monitoring, you see teams that are comfortable managing the entire observability stack themselves. The high correlation with N8N, a self-hosted automation tool, reinforces this pattern. These aren't companies buying Zapier subscriptions. They're deploying open-source alternatives on their own servers. Portainer's presence suggests many are running containerized workloads and want a self-hosted way to manage Docker environments.

This tech stack screams product-led companies in early to mid growth stages. They're past the scrappy startup phase where you use whatever works, but they haven't scaled to where buying enterprise solutions makes economic sense. They likely have 20 to 200 employees with technical founders or strong engineering leadership making infrastructure decisions. The emphasis on self-hosting and open source suggests they're bootstrapped or capital-efficient, watching their burn rate carefully.

Alternatives and Competitors to Hetzner

Explore vendors that are alternatives in this category

Bitbucket Bitbucket Cloud Run Cloud Run Cloudflare Workers Cloudflare Workers Alibaba Cloud Alibaba Cloud Supabase Supabase Hostinger Hostinger Google Cloud Build Google Cloud Build Scaleway Scaleway Vultr Vultr Vercel Pro Vercel Pro Heroku Heroku Huawei Cloud Huawei Cloud Bitrise Bitrise Jfrog Jfrog Cloudsmith Cloudsmith IBM Cloud IBM Cloud Gitlab CI Gitlab CI Google Cloud Google Cloud Drone CI Drone CI Oracle Cloud Oracle Cloud Buildkite Buildkite AppVeyor AppVeyor Gitea Gitea Travis CI Travis CI Infomaniak Infomaniak OVH OVH Hetzner Hetzner IONOS IONOS Contabo Contabo DigitalOcean DigitalOcean Azure Azure Jenkins Jenkins Gitlab Gitlab Github Actions Github Actions Verified Github Organization Verified Github Organization GitHub Enterprise GitHub Enterprise Github Github Dependabot Dependabot Github Enterprise with data residency Github Enterprise with data residency Azure Devops Azure Devops Helm Helm Windows Server Windows Server Azure App Service Azure App Service

Loading data...