Companies that use Jfrog

Analyzed and validated by Henley Wing Chiu ยท Updated
All โ€บ devops โ€บ Jfrog

Jfrog We detected 1,198 companies using Jfrog, 945 companies that churned, and 31 customers with upcoming renewal in the next 3 months. The most common industry is Software Development (30%) and the most common company size is 51-200 employees (28%). We find new customers by discovering URLs with known URL patterns through web crawling or modifications to subprocessor lists.

โฑ๏ธ Data is delayed by 1 month. To show real-time data, sign up for a free trial or login
Company Employees Industry Country Region Usage Start Date
Pollard Banknote Limited 1,001โ€“5,000 IT Services and IT Consulting
Canada
North America 2026-06-11
NestAI 51โ€“200 Technology, Information and Internet N/A Europe 2026-06-11
Trellix 1,001โ€“5,000 Computer and Network Security
United States
North America 2026-06-11
Haemonetics 1,001โ€“5,000 Medical Equipment Manufacturing
United States
North America 2026-06-09
Archer 1,001โ€“5,000 Airlines and Aviation
United States
North America 2026-06-09
Lumelight 201โ€“500 Business Consulting and Services
United States
North America 2026-06-05
Svenska Spel 501โ€“1,000 Gambling Facilities and Casinos
Sweden
Europe 2026-06-03
Atacadรฃo 10,001+ Wholesale
Brazil
South America 2026-05-30
Banamex 10,001+ Banking
Mexico
North America 2026-05-30
Obsidian Security 51โ€“200 Computer and Network Security
United States
North America 2026-05-28
Evinova 201โ€“500 Software Development N/A Europe 2026-05-23
Zelis 1,001โ€“5,000 Software Development
United States
North America 2026-05-23
JTL-Software-GmbH 201โ€“500 Software Development
Germany
Europe 2026-05-20
DEPTH FIRST Co., Ltd. 51โ€“200 IT Services and IT Consulting
Thailand
Asia 2026-05-14
Movistar Colombia 1,001โ€“5,000 Telecommunications N/A N/A 2026-05-13
Aquera 201โ€“500 Software Development
United States
North America 2026-05-13
StarHub 1,001โ€“5,000 Telecommunications
Singapore
Asia 2026-05-09
Configura 201โ€“500 Software Development
Sweden
Europe 2026-05-07
ISN 501โ€“1,000 IT Services and IT Consulting
United States
North America 2026-05-03
Australian Payments Plus 501โ€“1,000 Financial Services
Australia
Oceania 2026-05-02
Showing 1-20

New Users (Companies) Detected Over Time

i

Market Insights

๐Ÿข Top Industries

Software Development 334 (30%)
Financial Services 103 (9%)
IT Services and IT Consulting 80 (7%)
Technology, Information and Internet 57 (5%)
Computer and Network Security 33 (3%)

๐Ÿ“ Company Size Distribution

51-200 employees 325 (28%)
201-500 employees 219 (19%)
1,001-5,000 employees 200 (17%)
501-1,000 employees 159 (14%)
10,001+ employees 115 (10%)

๐Ÿ“Š Who usually uses Jfrog and for what use cases?

Source: Analysis of job postings that mention Jfrog (using the Bloomberry Jobs API)

Job titles that mention Jfrog
i
Job Title
Share
Director of DevOps/Engineering
28%
Vice President of Engineering/Technology
22%
DevOps Engineer
18%
Director of Information Security
12%
My analysis shows that JFrog buyers are primarily engineering and security leaders. Directors of DevOps and Engineering represent 28% of roles, while VPs of Engineering and Technology account for 22%. Directors of Information Security make up 12%, revealing that JFrog purchasing decisions span both development operations and security organizations. These leaders are prioritizing cloud transformation, automation, and securing software supply chains. Their strategic focus is on building platforms that enable developer productivity while maintaining security compliance.

Day-to-day users are DevOps engineers (18% of postings) and full-stack developers who work hands-on with CI/CD pipelines. I noticed practitioners using JFrog Artifactory for artifact management, integrating it with Jenkins, GitHub Actions, and Kubernetes environments. They're managing vulnerability scanning with JFrog Xray, automating build processes, and ensuring secure package distribution across development lifecycles. The work involves maintaining high-availability systems and supporting both on-premises and cloud deployments.

The pain points center on scalability, security, and developer experience. Companies repeatedly mention goals like "accelerating software delivery," "ensuring compliance and security," and building "enterprise-grade DevOps platforms." One posting emphasized "minimizing technical debt" while another sought to "ensure high availability, resilience and quick mean time to recovery." Organizations are clearly trying to balance speed with security, automate manual processes, and create standardized tooling that works across global development teams while meeting regulatory requirements.

๐Ÿ‘ฅ What types of companies use Jfrog?

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 1,198 companies that use Jfrog

Company Characteristics
i
Trait
Likelihood
Funding Stage: Series F
574.9x
Funding Stage: Series E
319.3x
Funding Stage: Secondary market
176.4x
Company Size: 10,001+
33.6x
Company Size: 5,001-10,000
23.7x
Company Size: 1,001-5,000
19.3x
I noticed that JFrog's customers span an incredibly diverse range of industries, but they share a common thread: they're building complex, technology-intensive products and services. These aren't just tech companies. I see automotive manufacturers like Toyota and Hyundai, medical device makers like Insulet and Accuray, financial institutions like NIBC Bank and Banco Bradesco, and telecom giants like Vodafone. What unites them is that software and digital infrastructure are mission-critical to their operations, whether they're building connected vehicles, life-saving medical devices, or global payment systems.

These are predominantly mature, established enterprises. The employee counts tell the story: I see numerous companies with 1,000+ employees, many with 10,000+. Several are publicly traded or have received substantial late-stage funding (Series D, Series E, post-IPO). Even the smaller companies in this list, those with 50-200 employees, tend to be well-funded (Series B or C) and serving enterprise customers. These aren't garage startups. They're organizations with significant scale, complex infrastructure, and serious compliance requirements.

๐Ÿ”ง What other technologies do Jfrog customers also use?

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 1,198 companies that use Jfrog

Commonly Paired Technologies
i
Technology
Likelihood
355.5x
340.6x
310.4x
292.8x
241.7x
197.6x
I noticed that JFrog users represent mature, security-conscious technology companies building sophisticated software development operations. The presence of Docker Hub at nearly 200x the normal rate tells me these are containerization-first organizations, while the extremely high correlation with enterprise identity providers like Okta and OneLogin signals companies serious about security and compliance. This combination points to mid-to-late stage B2B software companies with complex deployment pipelines and strict access controls.

The pairing of JFrog with Docker Hub makes perfect sense because JFrog Artifactory serves as the enterprise-grade registry and repository manager that sits alongside containerized workflows. When I see PagerDuty appearing 340x more often, it reveals these companies run always-on services where incident response is critical. They're not just shipping software, they're operating it at scale. The Adobe Audience Manager correlation initially surprised me, but it suggests these technical companies still invest heavily in marketing automation and customer data platforms, likely because they're selling to other businesses and need sophisticated lead nurturing.

The full stack reveals sales-led B2B organizations in growth or scale-up phases. Lucidchart's presence indicates extensive internal documentation and process mapping, typical of companies coordinating larger engineering teams. The enterprise SSO tools show they're managing significant headcount and likely selling to other enterprises who demand SOC 2 compliance. These aren't scrappy startups or product-led growth companies, they're organizations with formal security requirements, structured development processes, and mature operational practices.

Alternatives and Competitors to Jfrog

Explore vendors that are alternatives in this category

IBM Cloud IBM Cloud Bitbucket Bitbucket Cloudflare Workers Cloudflare Workers Cloud Run Cloud Run Supabase Supabase Hostinger Hostinger Scaleway Scaleway Vultr Vultr Vercel Pro Vercel Pro Heroku Heroku Huawei Cloud Huawei Cloud Bitrise Bitrise Jfrog Jfrog Cloudsmith Cloudsmith Google Cloud Google Cloud Oracle Cloud Oracle Cloud Gitea Gitea Infomaniak Infomaniak OVH OVH Hetzner Hetzner Contabo Contabo IONOS IONOS Drone CI Drone CI Buildkite Buildkite AppVeyor AppVeyor Google Cloud Build Google Cloud Build Travis CI Travis CI Gitlab CI Gitlab CI DigitalOcean DigitalOcean Gitlab Dedicated Gitlab Dedicated Jenkins Jenkins Gitlab Gitlab Azure Azure Github Discussions Github Discussions GitHub Enterprise GitHub Enterprise Github Github Github Sponsors Github Sponsors AWS AWS Github Actions Github Actions Verified Github Organization Verified Github Organization Dependabot Dependabot Github Enterprise with data residency Github Enterprise with data residency Azure Devops Azure Devops Helm Helm Windows Server Windows Server Azure App Service Azure App Service

Loading data...