Companies that use Infomaniak

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 768 companies that use Infomaniak

I noticed that Infomaniak's customers are predominantly service providers and agencies rather than product manufacturers. These are digital agencies building websites and apps for clients, consulting firms helping businesses transform digitally, IT service companies managing infrastructure, and professional service organizations like law offices, trade associations, and non-profits. There's a strong showing of creative agencies specializing in web development, UX/UI design, and digital marketing. Even the few product companies in the mix tend to be creating software solutions or specialized services rather than physical goods.

These are primarily established small to medium businesses rather than startups. Most have 10-50 employees, have been operating for several years (many since the 2000s or 2010s), and show no recent funding rounds. The few that mention funding are typically at seed or early grant stages. They're past survival mode but haven't scaled to enterprise size. They're stable, profitable service businesses with loyal client bases, not venture-backed growth companies burning cash to scale.

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 768 companies that use Infomaniak

I noticed that Infomaniak customers are overwhelmingly technical, self-hosted infrastructure enthusiasts who prioritize control and customization over convenience. The extreme correlation with Portainer (a Docker container management tool) and N8N (a self-hosted workflow automation platform) tells me these companies want to own their entire stack rather than rely on SaaS solutions. They're choosing open-source tools they can deploy on their own terms.

The pairing of N8N with Infomaniak makes perfect sense because both represent a philosophy of independence. Companies using N8N are automating workflows without paying per-workflow fees to Zapier, and they're hosting it on infrastructure they control through Infomaniak. Similarly, the Gitlab correlation suggests these teams are running their own CI/CD pipelines and code repositories rather than using GitHub's cloud offering. The Grafana presence reinforces this pattern because these companies are building custom monitoring dashboards for their self-hosted infrastructure. They're not just running websites but managing complex, observable systems.

The full stack reveals product-led companies in growth or early scale stages, likely 10 to 100 employees. These are technical teams with engineering-driven cultures who view infrastructure decisions as strategic advantages. They're not sales-led because sales-led organizations typically choose mainstream SaaS tools that integrate easily. The presence of Odoo (open-source ERP) and Brevo (affordable email marketing) suggests cost consciousness combined with a preference for flexible, API-driven platforms they can customize.