Companies that use PerimeterX

Analyzed and validated by Henley Wing Chiu
All web application firewall PerimeterX

PerimeterX We detected 434 companies using PerimeterX and 4 customers with upcoming renewal in the next 3 months. The most common industry is Retail (25%) and the most common company size is 2-10 employees (25%). We find new customers by detecting JavaScript snippets or configurations on customer websites.

⏱️ Data is delayed by 1 month. To show real-time data, sign up for a free trial or login
Company Employees Industry Country Region Usage Start Date
dotloop 51–200 Real Estate
US United States
North America 2026-04-19
Spearhead 51–200 IT Services and IT Consulting
US United States
North America 2026-04-17
Appliance Factory & Mattress Kingdom 201–500 Retail
US United States
North America 2026-04-16
Anchorage Daily News 201–500 Newspaper Publishing
US United States
North America 2026-04-10
EUVC 11–50 Venture Capital and Private Equity Principals
GB United Kingdom
Europe 2026-04-08
Pepper 2–10 Social Networking Platforms
US United States
North America 2026-04-08
The National Network to End Domestic Violence (NNEDV) 11–50 Civic and Social Organizations
US United States
North America 2026-04-07
Big Cat Rescue 2–10 Non-profit Organizations
US United States
North America 2026-04-06
Neighborhood Legal Services 51–200 Legal Services
US United States
North America 2026-04-06
Lucy Daniels Center 11–50 Mental Health Care
US United States
North America 2026-04-06
Share & Care Foundation 2–10 Non-profit Organization Management
US United States
North America 2026-04-06
National Immigrant Justice Center 51–200 Legal Services
US United States
North America 2026-04-06
Mental Health Center of Greater Manchester 201–500 Mental Health Care
US United States
North America 2026-04-06
Queens Defenders 51–200 Law Practice
US United States
North America 2026-04-06
Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP) 2–10 Civic and Social Organizations
US United States
North America 2026-04-06
PrimaSoft Inc 11–50 Human Resources Services
US United States
North America 2026-03-25
Assistants vs. Agents 2–10 Media Production
US United States
North America 2026-03-22
Classified Ads 2–10 Technology, Information and Internet N/A North America 2026-03-12
Wayland Games Ltd. 51–200 Retail
GB United Kingdom
Europe 2026-03-10
This Week in Fintech 11–50 Financial Services N/A North America 2026-03-05
Showing 1-20

Market Insights

🏢 Top Industries

Retail 93 (25%)
Technology, Information and Internet 25 (7%)
Retail Apparel and Fashion 16 (4%)
Newspaper Publishing 12 (3%)
Manufacturing 11 (3%)

📏 Company Size Distribution

2-10 employees 107 (25%)
51-200 employees 73 (17%)
201-500 employees 60 (14%)
11-50 employees 57 (13%)
1,001-5,000 employees 51 (12%)

📊 Who usually uses PerimeterX and for what use cases?

Source: Analysis of job postings that mention PerimeterX (using the Bloomberry Jobs API)

Job titles that mention PerimeterX
i
Job Title
Share
Security Engineer
22%
Web Scraping/Anti-Bot Engineer
17%
Staff/Senior Software Engineer
17%
Director of Analytics
11%
I noticed that PerimeterX purchasing decisions are driven primarily by security and platform engineering leaders, with 22% of roles being security engineers and another 17% being specialized anti-bot engineers. Directors of analytics and marketing also appear in the buying process, suggesting that bot protection ties directly to revenue metrics and customer acquisition performance. These leaders are prioritizing transitions from legacy systems, as one posting explicitly mentions retiring PerimeterX alongside other platforms.

The day-to-day users are highly technical practitioners working in security operations, DevOps, and application security roles. These teams monitor bot detection systems, tune security rules, manage integrations with tools like Cloudflare and DataDome, and respond to threats. The web scraping engineers I found are actually on the opposite side, building systems that evade bot protection, which reveals how sophisticated the cat-and-mouse game has become. QA and software engineers use PerimeterX as part of their infrastructure stack for protecting APIs and web applications.

The pain points center on balancing security with user experience and operational scale. Companies want to defend against threats and vulnerabilities without impeding the business and customer experience, as one cybersecurity posting states. Another emphasizes protecting companies from both revenue and reputation risk caused by digital attacks. The migration language around legacy system retirements suggests organizations are consolidating or upgrading their bot protection strategies to handle massive scale, with one platform processing millions of daily API requests.

👥 What types of companies use PerimeterX?

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 434 companies that use PerimeterX

Company Characteristics
i
Trait
Likelihood
Funding Stage: Post IPO debt
97.0x
Industry: Newspaper Publishing
50.3x
Funding Stage: Post IPO equity
49.4x
Company Size: 10,001+
27.1x
Funding Stage: Debt financing
24.0x
Industry: Retail
23.3x
I noticed that PerimeterX customers are predominantly consumer-facing companies operating digital storefronts and transactional platforms. The majority are retailers selling physical goods like furniture, appliances, luxury goods, and clothing. Beyond pure retail, I see significant representation from media companies, insurance providers, financial services firms, and food delivery platforms. What ties them together is that they all operate websites where customers browse products, make purchases, or access services directly online.

These are overwhelmingly mature, established enterprises rather than startups. The employee counts skew heavily toward mid-size to large organizations, with many reporting 200+ employees and several exceeding 10,000. Most lack recent funding information, and when funding is mentioned, it tends to be post-IPO equity or debt financing rather than venture rounds. The numerous Fortune 500 companies, publicly traded retailers, and businesses celebrating 50+ year anniversaries signal operational maturity and scale.

🔧 What other technologies do PerimeterX customers also use?

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 434 companies that use PerimeterX

Commonly Paired Technologies
i
Technology
Likelihood
18757.8x
12420.8x
2863.3x
1112.1x
1103.9x
1079.8x
I noticed that PerimeterX users are predominantly e-commerce and retail companies with sophisticated digital operations and high transaction volumes. The strong presence of tools like Agentforce Commerce, Narvar, and Bluecore tells me these are businesses where online revenue is critical and protecting the customer experience from bots and fraud is a top priority. These aren't small shops. They're established retailers managing complex customer journeys across multiple touchpoints.

The pairing with HumanSecurity makes perfect sense since both tools focus on bot detection and fraud prevention. These companies are clearly dealing with significant threats like credential stuffing, account takeover, and inventory hoarding by scalpers. When you add Narvar into the mix, which handles post-purchase tracking and returns, it confirms these businesses are managing high order volumes where even small percentages of fraud can mean massive losses. Bluecore's presence is equally telling. It's an email marketing platform built specifically for retail, suggesting these companies are running sophisticated retention and personalization campaigns where protecting customer data and preventing account compromise directly impacts revenue.

The full tech stack reveals these are marketing-led and operations-focused companies at a growth or mature stage. They're investing in tools that protect and optimize existing revenue streams rather than just acquiring new customers. ServiceChannel's appearance suggests many operate physical locations alongside digital channels, making them true omnichannel retailers. They have complex operational needs that go beyond basic e-commerce.

Alternatives and Competitors to PerimeterX

Explore vendors that are alternatives in this category

HumanSecurity HumanSecurity Oracle WAF Oracle WAF Spur Spur Indusface Indusface Cloudflare WAF Cloudflare WAF Cloudflare Enterprise Cloudflare Enterprise Cloudflare Turnstile Cloudflare Turnstile HAProxy HAProxy Sucuri Sucuri AWS Application Load Balancer for Backend Services AWS Application Load Balancer for Backend Services PerimeterX PerimeterX Google Cloud Load Balancer Google Cloud Load Balancer Barracuda WAF Barracuda WAF Radware Cloud WAF Radware Cloud WAF F5 Distributed Cloud F5 Distributed Cloud Imperva WAF Imperva WAF AWS Application Load Balancer AWS Application Load Balancer F5 BIG IP F5 BIG IP AWS WAF AWS WAF Azure Application Gateway Azure Application Gateway Netscaler Netscaler

Loading data...