We detected 385 customers using Webengage, 198 companies that churned or ended their trial, and 8 customers with estimated renewals in the next 3 months. The most common industry is Retail (13%) and the most common company size is 51-200 employees (28%). Our methodology involves detecting JavaScript snippets or configurations on customer websites.
About Webengage
Webengage unifies customer data across sources and enables brands to deliver personalized, omnichannel engagement campaigns across email, SMS, WhatsApp, push notifications, and in-app messaging to boost retention and drive revenue from existing customers.
📊 Who in an organization decides to buy or use Webengage?
Source: Analysis of 100 job postings that mention Webengage
Job titles that mention Webengage
i
Based on an analysis of job titles from postings that mention Webengage.
Job Title
Share
CRM Manager
18%
Marketing Automation Specialist
16%
Performance Marketing Specialist
12%
Campaign Manager
9%
I noticed that WebEngage buyers are predominantly marketing leaders hiring for customer lifecycle management roles. CRM Managers represent 18% of positions, followed by Marketing Automation Specialists at 16% and Performance Marketing Specialists at 12%. These hiring managers prioritize retention, engagement, and automated customer journeys. The two leadership roles I found focus on business development and retention strategy, suggesting that purchasing decisions sit with senior marketing or growth executives who need to demonstrate measurable ROI through reduced churn and increased customer lifetime value.
The day-to-day users are hands-on marketing operators executing multi-channel campaigns across email, SMS, WhatsApp, push notifications, and in-app messages. These practitioners build customer segmentation models, create automated journeys, run A/B tests, and optimize conversion funnels. They work extensively with behavioral data to personalize communications and improve metrics like activation rates, retention, and ARPU. Many roles specifically mention managing hundreds of campaigns monthly across multiple brands or user cohorts.
The companies hiring reveal consistent pain points around scaling personalized engagement. They want to "drive user engagement and retention through highly contextual, hyper-personalized engagement campaigns" and "maximize revenue per customer by re-engaging dormant audiences." Another posting emphasizes the need to "translate data into actionable insights" for marketing improvement. I see a clear pattern of organizations struggling to move from generic batch campaigns to sophisticated, data-driven lifecycle marketing that treats different user segments intelligently based on their behavior and value.
🔧 What other technologies do Webengage customers also use?
Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 385 companies that use Webengage
Commonly Paired Technologies
i
Shows how much more likely Webengage customers are to use each tool compared to the general population. For example, 287x means customers are 287 times more likely to use that tool.
I noticed that WebEngage users are predominantly Indian digital-first companies operating in consumer-facing markets. The presence of GoKiwk (a lending decisioning platform) and Bureau (identity verification for fintech) appearing hundreds of times more frequently tells me these are primarily e-commerce and fintech companies serving the Indian market. They're building modern consumer experiences where user engagement and conversion optimization are critical to their business model.
The pairing of WebEngage with CleverTap is particularly revealing. These companies aren't just picking one engagement platform and calling it done. They're running multiple marketing automation tools simultaneously, which suggests they're aggressively testing different approaches to user retention and monetization. The high correlation with Microsoft Clarity shows they're obsessive about understanding user behavior through session recordings and heatmaps before crafting their engagement campaigns. Meanwhile, NextJS appearing 74 times more frequently indicates these companies prioritize fast, modern web experiences that convert mobile users effectively.
My analysis shows these are marketing-led growth companies, likely in the growth or scale-up stage. They've moved past product-market fit and are now focused on optimizing every step of the customer journey. The combination of verification tools, lending infrastructure, and multiple engagement platforms suggests they're dealing with complex user flows where drop-off is expensive. These aren't enterprise B2B companies with long sales cycles. They're consumer businesses where a 1% improvement in conversion rates directly impacts revenue.
👥 What types of companies is most likely to use Webengage?
Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 385 companies that use Webengage
Company Characteristics
i
Shows how much more likely Webengage customers are to have each trait compared to all companies. For example, 2.0x means customers are twice as likely to have that characteristic.
Trait
Likelihood
Funding Stage: Seed
27.8x
Country: IN
21.0x
Industry: Retail
11.2x
Company Size: 1,001-5,000
10.3x
Company Size: 501-1,000
9.5x
Industry: Financial Services
7.7x
I noticed that Webengage's typical customers are consumer-facing businesses selling directly to individuals, primarily in retail, e-commerce, fashion, travel, financial services, and hospitality. These aren't B2B software companies. They're brands selling handbags, hotel rooms, insurance policies, furniture, jewelry, flight tickets, and health supplements. Many operate omnichannel models, managing both physical stores and digital platforms, which suggests they need sophisticated tools to coordinate customer engagement across touchpoints.
These companies span the full maturity spectrum, though growth-stage businesses dominate. I see seed and Series A startups like Hexafun and The Bear House, mid-stage companies like Foxtale (Series C, $30M) and Wooden Street (Series C, $41.8M), and mature enterprises like Lemon Tree Hotels (6,851 employees) and Reliance General Insurance (7,989 employees). The funding data and employee counts signal companies actively scaling, not just launching or maintaining steady state.
Alternatives and Competitors to Webengage
Explore vendors that are alternatives in this category