We detected 91 customers using Syft, 22 companies that churned or ended their trial, and 14 customers with estimated renewals in the next 3 months. The most common industry is Software Development (46%) and the most common company size is 11-50 employees (44%). Our methodology involves detecting JavaScript snippets or configurations on customer websites.
Note: We only track when a company installs the Syft tracking script on their website (majority of customers)
About Syft
Syft identifies high-intent ICP buyers from website visits and LinkedIn engagements using AI, then automatically triggers email, LinkedIn, and ad campaigns to help growth teams capture revenue opportunities.
🔧 What other technologies do Syft customers also use?
Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 91 companies that use Syft
Commonly Paired Technologies
i
Shows how much more likely Syft customers are to use each tool compared to the general population. For example, 287x means customers are 287 times more likely to use that tool.
I noticed companies using Syft have a distinctly modern, data-driven go-to-market approach. The presence of tools like Koala, Clay Web Intent, and UnifyGTM tells me these are B2B companies obsessed with signal-based selling. They're not doing traditional outbound. Instead, they're monitoring buyer intent, enriching data in real-time, and coordinating revenue teams around actual engagement signals rather than cold lists.
The pairing of Koala with Clay Web Intent is particularly revealing. Koala tracks which companies are visiting your website and what they're doing there, while Clay Web Intent identifies when target accounts are researching relevant topics across the web. Together, these tools create a comprehensive view of buyer interest before anyone fills out a form. Adding UnifyGTM into the mix suggests these companies are then routing those signals to the right sellers automatically. This is the workflow of teams that believe timing matters more than volume.
The inclusion of Ashby for recruiting and Incident.io for incident management points to relatively early-stage but operationally sophisticated companies. These aren't legacy enterprises. They're growth-stage startups that care deeply about velocity and coordination. The full stack screams sales-led growth, but with a product-led sensibility. They want their sales teams armed with context and perfect timing rather than just dialing for dollars.
👥 What types of companies is most likely to use Syft?
Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 91 companies that use Syft
Company Characteristics
i
Shows how much more likely Syft customers are to have each trait compared to all companies. For example, 2.0x means customers are twice as likely to have that characteristic.
Trait
Likelihood
Industry: Software Development
29.7x
Country: US
4.4x
Company Size: 51-200
4.1x
Company Size: 11-50
2.3x
I noticed that Syft's customers are predominantly B2B technology and services companies, with a strong concentration in SaaS platforms, data infrastructure, and enterprise software. These aren't consumer apps. They're building tools for other businesses: AI-powered platforms, developer infrastructure, data streaming solutions, marketing automation, security software, and specialized vertical SaaS for industries like logistics, healthcare, and construction. Many operate in complex, technical domains where explaining value requires sophistication.
The funding and size signals point to growth-stage companies navigating scale. About 40% have raised institutional capital, mostly Seed through Series B, with employee counts clustering in the 11-50 and 51-200 ranges. These aren't pre-product startups or Fortune 500 giants. They're in that crucial middle phase where they've achieved product-market fit and now face operational complexity: managing multiple data sources, scaling customer acquisition, proving ROI to enterprise buyers, and professionalizing finance operations while maintaining velocity.
Alternatives and Competitors to Syft
Explore vendors that are alternatives in this category