Companies that use Iterable

Source: Analysis of 100 job postings that mention Iterable

I found that Iterable is primarily purchased by lifecycle and CRM marketing leaders, with Directors of Lifecycle Marketing representing 31% of roles and various marketing automation specialists making up another 20%. These buyers sit within marketing departments at digital-first companies and are tasked with owning end-to-end customer journey orchestration. Their strategic priorities center on driving retention, maximizing lifetime value, and building what multiple postings call a "single source of truth" for customer engagement across email, SMS, push, and in-app channels.

The day-to-day users are hands-on marketing practitioners who live in Iterable building campaigns, setting up automated journeys, and managing segmentation. They're responsible for what one posting describes as "design and launch of automated and manual campaigns" and "develop automated, behavior-triggered flows and journey orchestration based on real-time data signals." These users are executing A/B tests, managing deliverability, coordinating with creative teams, and translating business requirements into working campaigns that span the full customer lifecycle from onboarding through win-back.

The pain points are remarkably consistent across postings. Companies want to "create dynamic, individualized experiences at scale" and move beyond generic batch-and-blast approaches. They're seeking to "turn signups into power users and power users into champions" through "personalized, data-driven experiences" that feel relevant at every touchpoint. Multiple roles emphasize the need to "maximize customer lifetime value" while reducing churn through "AI-powered personalization" and sophisticated segmentation that goes far beyond basic demographic targeting.

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 562 companies that use Iterable

I noticed that Iterable users are typically growth-stage consumer-facing companies with sophisticated, data-driven marketing operations. The overwhelming presence of Segment alongside Iterable tells me these companies have invested in unified customer data infrastructure. They're collecting behavioral data from multiple touchpoints and want to orchestrate personalized messaging based on that consolidated view. These aren't companies sending batch-and-blast emails. They're building complex, trigger-based communication flows.

The pairing of Branch and Iterable is particularly revealing. Branch handles mobile deep linking and attribution, which means these companies care deeply about the mobile user experience and tracking how users move between channels. They're likely consumer apps or e-commerce businesses where the mobile journey is critical. Parse.ly's presence reinforces this, as it's primarily used by digital media and content companies to understand engagement patterns. These companies are using content consumption behavior to trigger personalized outreach through Iterable.

The Forethought correlation is fascinating because it's an AI customer support tool. This suggests Iterable users are thinking holistically about the customer experience, not just marketing campaigns. They want customer service interactions to inform marketing touchpoints and vice versa. Dash Hudson, which focuses on visual content analytics for social media, points to companies where brand aesthetics and social presence matter, likely direct-to-consumer brands.

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 562 companies that use Iterable

I noticed that Iterable's customers are predominantly consumer-facing companies that need to maintain direct, ongoing relationships with their end users. These aren't enterprise software companies selling to other businesses. They're financial services apps helping people build credit, meal kit services delivering to your door, fitness platforms streaming classes, retail brands selling underwear or greeting cards, and travel companies booking your next trip. What unites them is the need to keep customers engaged, coming back, and moving through a journey, whether that's building credit over time, ordering meals weekly, or rebooking travel experiences.

These companies span the growth spectrum more than I expected. Yes, there are Series A and B startups with 50-200 employees, but I also see established enterprises like American Greetings with 10,000+ employees, profitable unicorns like Kikoff, and mature brands like Thomas Cook. The common thread isn't funding stage but growth mode. Even the larger companies describe themselves as "rapidly growing" or "expanding." They're scaling customer bases, entering new markets, or launching new product lines.