Companies that use Barracuda WAF

Source: Analysis of 100 job postings that mention Barracuda WAF

I noticed that Barracuda WAF purchasing decisions are primarily driven by security and infrastructure leadership roles, though none appeared in these postings as individual contributors dominate the landscape. The hiring patterns reveal organizations prioritizing infrastructure security teams who need experience with multiple security platforms including Palo Alto, CrowdStrike, and Barracuda WAF. These teams focus on deployment, operational management, and integration with broader security ecosystems spanning cloud and on-premise environments.

The day-to-day users are primarily SOC analysts and security engineers who handle configuration management, rule creation, and threat mitigation. My analysis shows practitioners are responsible for implementing allow and deny lists, creating WAF rules and signatures to mitigate threats, monitoring activity logs to detect malicious traffic, and developing virtual patching solutions for web application vulnerabilities. They work extensively with automation through scripting languages like Python and shell scripting to manage WAF deployments at scale.

The job postings reveal organizations struggling with multi-cloud security complexity and operational efficiency. Companies seek candidates who can provide comprehensive insight into risk to threats, implement cybersecurity controls within multiple environments, and ensure incidents and problems are resolved in line with SLAs. The emphasis on scripting, automation to manage the WAF, and familiarity with web application security concepts shows organizations want to move beyond manual processes toward more scalable, proactive security operations.

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 260 companies that use Barracuda WAF

I noticed that Barracuda WAF users cluster strongly around Microsoft's ecosystem and advertising technology platforms, which tells me these are typically traditional enterprises pursuing digital transformation while maintaining conservative security approaches. The overwhelming presence of Azure services (DNS and DevOps at 45.7x and 20.8x respectively) combined with Dynamics Customer Journey suggests these companies are all-in on Microsoft's enterprise stack rather than adopting best-of-breed cloud solutions.

The pairing with Barracuda Email Security appearing 55.5x more often is particularly revealing. These companies want their security unified under a single vendor, prioritizing procurement simplicity and vendor consolidation over potentially more sophisticated alternatives. When I see this combined with Azure DevOps, it suggests IT departments that value integration and support relationships. The Lotame and Taboola connections (227.7x and 94.8x more likely) are fascinating because they indicate companies running significant paid advertising operations and third-party audience data strategies. These aren't just protecting internal apps but are securing customer-facing digital properties that drive revenue through advertising or lead generation.

My analysis shows these are established companies in growth mode, likely marketing-led or sales-led rather than product-led. The Dynamics Customer Journey integration points to structured marketing automation and customer lifecycle management, not the bottoms-up adoption you'd see in product-led companies. They're probably managing complex multi-touch attribution and need to protect customer data flowing through advertising platforms. I'd estimate these are Series C and beyond startups or mid-market companies with dedicated marketing operations teams.

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 260 companies that use Barracuda WAF

I noticed that Barracuda WAF users span an incredibly diverse range of industries, but they share a common thread: they operate critical infrastructure or handle sensitive data that requires protection. These companies include telecommunications providers like Alaska Communications, healthcare organizations like Nova IVF Fertility and Bikurofe medical clinics, financial institutions like Ruffer Investment Management, automotive dealerships representing BMW across India, pharmaceutical manufacturers like Besins Healthcare, and food distribution companies like Amul. They also include government entities like Leeds City Council and educational funding organizations like NSFAS. What unites them is not their industry, but their operational complexity and the criticality of their digital services.

These are predominantly mature, established enterprises rather than startups. The signals are clear: many mention decades of operation (Leal since 1966, Amul's 3.6 million farmer network, Orano's 17,000 employees). They operate multiple physical locations, maintain large employee bases (typically 50 to 5,000+ employees), and describe complex operational infrastructure like manufacturing facilities, distribution networks, and service centers. Very few show venture funding, and when they do, it's often later-stage private equity rather than early venture rounds.