Companies that use Statamic

Source: Analysis of job postings that mention Statamic (using the Bloomberry Jobs API)

My analysis shows that Statamic purchasing decisions are primarily made by technical leaders and marketing directors hiring for development roles. The breakdown reveals Full Stack Developers (35%), Frontend Developers (25%), and Web Developers (15%) dominate the hiring landscape, with Marketing Managers (10%) rounding out the key buyers. These buyers are focused on building and maintaining corporate websites, marketing platforms, and content-driven digital experiences that support lead generation and brand presence.

The day-to-day users are hands-on developers working across the entire web stack. I noticed they're building responsive websites, managing content workflows, creating landing pages, and integrating Statamic with other marketing technologies. These practitioners work closely with designers, content teams, and marketers to implement CMS-driven platforms. They're responsible for creating flexible, editor-friendly page blocks, maintaining component libraries, and ensuring sites are optimized for performance and accessibility.

The job postings reveal companies seeking to modernize their web presence and scale content operations efficiently. One posting emphasized the need to build platforms that enable teams to "efficiently manage and publish content," while another highlighted creating "editor-friendly page blocks that our content and marketing teams can actually use." A third noted the importance of "scalable solutions that enable our teams to manage and publish content." These phrases consistently point to the core pain point: empowering non-technical teams to manage sophisticated web experiences without constant developer involvement.

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 2,899 companies that use Statamic

I noticed that Statamic users span an incredibly diverse range of sectors, but they share a common thread: they're organizations with a strong public presence that need to communicate effectively. These aren't typical SaaS companies. Instead, I'm seeing government agencies like the Care Inspectorate in Scotland, healthcare providers like hospitals in the Czech Republic, educational institutions from schools to universities, cultural organizations like museums and entertainment companies, professional services firms including architecture practices and law offices, and specialized B2B businesses. Many are providing essential services or managing complex stakeholder relationships.

The maturity level is revealing. These are predominantly established organizations, not startups. The employee counts cluster in the 11-200 range, and very few mention funding rounds. When they do reference their history, it's often measuring in decades. I'm seeing companies founded in the 1960s, 1980s, and 1990s that have grown steadily. They're stable, profitable businesses at the point where they need a sophisticated web presence but don't require the complexity of enterprise platforms.

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 2,899 companies that use Statamic

I noticed that Statamic users tend to be digitally sophisticated small to mid-sized companies that prioritize developer-friendly tools and operational efficiency. The strong presence of DigitalOcean, combined with boutique services like Postmark and Fathom Analytics, tells me these are typically agencies, design studios, or content-focused businesses that value control and simplicity over enterprise complexity. They're building custom solutions for clients or running lean internal operations where every tool needs to justify its cost.

The pairing of Statamic with Postmark is particularly revealing. Companies using both are serious about transactional email reliability, which suggests they're running membership sites, e-commerce platforms, or client portals where email delivery directly impacts revenue. The prevalence of Fathom Analytics shows a similar philosophy: these teams want clean data without the privacy concerns or bloat of Google Analytics. They're likely working with European clients or simply prefer privacy-first tools. The high correlation with CookieBot reinforces this, indicating they're managing GDPR compliance thoughtfully rather than as an afterthought.

My analysis shows these companies operate in a marketing-led but technically proficient way. They're not enterprise sales organizations with complex procurement processes. Instead, they're likely in the growth stage where they've moved past startup chaos but haven't graduated to enterprise tooling. The presence of Mailchimp over enterprise marketing automation platforms confirms they value straightforward, effective marketing tools. They're building custom digital experiences for clients or their own businesses, which means they need flexible CMSs like Statamic paired with reliable infrastructure.