Companies that use LogicGate

Source: Analysis of 100 job postings that mention LogicGate

I noticed that LogicGate is primarily purchased by senior leadership in risk management, compliance, and information security functions. Directors of Risk Management (23%) and VPs of Enterprise Risk Management (14%) make up 37% of hiring activity, while Directors of Information Security (16%) represent the cybersecurity buying contingent. These leaders are building programs from scratch or maturing existing ones, with strategic priorities centered on automation, scalability, and regulatory compliance. They're focused on establishing frameworks for third-party risk management, enterprise risk management, and governance programs that can support rapid organizational growth.

The day-to-day users are Senior Managers and Analysts in GRC roles (30% combined), who serve as the platform administrators and power users. These practitioners conduct risk assessments, manage vendor questionnaires, track audit findings, coordinate compliance activities across SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and other frameworks, and maintain risk registers. They're the ones building workflows, collecting evidence, generating dashboards, and ensuring the platform stays updated with current risk data. Several postings specifically mention responsibilities like administering the TPRM application or maintaining the GRC tool.

The pain points revolve around manual processes, siloed risk data, and audit readiness. Companies want to move from spreadsheets to centralized platforms that enable continuous monitoring and automated evidence collection. Key phrases include seeking to enhance processes and assessments to ensure maturity and effectiveness, leverage technology to help comply with all applicable laws and regulations while enabling innovation, automation, and scale, and implement automation-driven, data-informed security risk programs. Organizations are clearly trying to professionalize their risk functions and handle increasing regulatory complexity without proportionally increasing headcount.

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 206 companies that use LogicGate

I noticed that LogicGate users are enterprise companies with mature governance, risk, and compliance programs. The presence of Workday, Sailpoint Identity Cloud, and Proofpoint Security Training together tells me these are large organizations that have moved beyond basic compliance checkboxes into comprehensive risk management across their entire operations. They're dealing with complex regulatory requirements and need integrated systems to manage everything from workforce compliance to security governance.

The pairing of LogicGate with Tines is particularly revealing. Tines is a security automation platform, which suggests these companies are automating their incident response and compliance workflows. They're not just documenting risks, they're building automated playbooks to respond to them. Similarly, Checkmarx One appearing frequently makes sense because application security scanning needs to feed into a broader risk management framework. These companies want security findings to automatically flow into their governance processes. The Qualtrics correlation is interesting too because it suggests they're measuring compliance culture and employee sentiment around risk, treating governance as a people problem, not just a process problem.

The full stack reveals these are sales-led enterprises in growth or mature stages. They're not startups experimenting with point solutions. The investment in Workday alone signals serious enterprise scale, while Sailpoint indicates they're managing complex identity governance across many systems. These companies likely have dedicated GRC teams, CISOs with board visibility, and compliance officers who need executive dashboards. They're buying enterprise software through traditional procurement processes with multiple stakeholders involved.

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 206 companies that use LogicGate

I noticed that LogicGate's customers are predominantly established enterprises operating in heavily regulated, high-stakes environments. These aren't companies selling consumer apps or digital services. They're organizations dealing with tangible complexity: banks processing billions in assets, healthcare systems managing thousands of patient beds, manufacturers producing physical products, insurers underwriting risk, and telecommunications providers maintaining critical infrastructure. They move money, treat patients, build buildings, manage supply chains, and operate networks that communities depend on.

These are mature, established enterprises. I see Fortune 500 companies, publicly traded firms with post-IPO funding rounds, and organizations with 1,000 to 10,000-plus employees. Many mention decades of history (founded in 1889, operating since 1912, 70 years of innovation). The funding stages lean heavily toward post-IPO debt and equity, not Series A or seed rounds. These organizations have complex operations spanning multiple states or countries, extensive compliance requirements, and sprawling stakeholder ecosystems.