We detected 734 customers using Impact, 82 companies that churned or ended their trial, and 49 customers with estimated renewals in the next 3 months. The most common industry is Software Development (14%) and the most common company size is 51-200 employees (28%). Our methodology involves discovering URLs with known URL patterns through web crawling, certificate transparency logs, or modifications to subprocessor lists.
About Impact
Impact provides a unified platform for managing and scaling affiliate, influencer, and referral partnerships with automated workflows, performance tracking, fraud protection, and optimization tools. Enables brands to discover partners, track conversions across devices, automate payouts, and optimize all partnership types from a single interface.
🔧 What other technologies do Impact customers also use?
Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 734 companies that use Impact
Commonly Paired Technologies
i
Shows how much more likely Impact customers are to use each tool compared to the general population. For example, 287x means customers are 287 times more likely to use that tool.
I noticed that Impact users tend to be mature, operationally sophisticated companies that prioritize data-driven decision making and enterprise-scale infrastructure. The presence of tools like Qualtrics, PagerDuty, and Statsig tells me these are organizations that have moved beyond startup chaos into systematic growth management. They're investing heavily in customer experience, reliability, and experimentation.
The pairing of Decagon AI with Impact is particularly revealing. Impact is a partnership management platform, and Decagon provides AI-powered customer support. Together, they suggest companies managing complex partner ecosystems where support volume is high enough to warrant automation. Statsig alongside Impact makes perfect sense too. If you're running a partnership program, you need robust A/B testing to optimize commission structures, partner portals, and referral flows. The Qualtrics correlation tells me these companies are serious about measuring partner satisfaction and program effectiveness, not just tracking revenue.
The full tech stack screams partner-led growth at scale. These aren't companies just starting affiliate programs. They're running sophisticated partner channels with GoLinks for internal knowledge management, PagerDuty for system reliability when partners depend on your APIs, and ZipHQ for procurement processes around partnership agreements. This is clearly a marketing-led or growth-led motion, but one that's matured past early-stage scrappiness. They're likely Series B and beyond, possibly public companies, with dedicated partner or channel teams.
👥 What types of companies is most likely to use Impact?
Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 734 companies that use Impact
Company Characteristics
i
Shows how much more likely Impact customers are to have each trait compared to all companies. For example, 2.0x means customers are twice as likely to have that characteristic.
Trait
Likelihood
Funding Stage: Private equity
45.8x
Funding Stage: Series unknown
16.9x
Industry: Retail Apparel and Fashion
9.1x
Company Size: 1,001-5,000
5.6x
Industry: Retail
5.1x
Industry: Software Development
4.2x
I noticed that Impact's customers span an incredibly wide range of industries, but they share a common thread: they sell physical products or services directly to consumers. These aren't pure B2B software companies. Instead, I'm seeing e-commerce retailers (Walmart, Takealot, SSENSE), wellness and health brands (Ancient Nutrition, ARMRA, Mixhers), furniture makers (Herman Miller, Humanscale), pet products (Freshpet, Cosmos Corporation), and services ranging from mental healthcare (BetterHelp, Talkiatry) to fitness ([solidcore], Alpha Lion). Many operate hybrid models, selling through both their own channels and major retail partners.
The company sizes vary dramatically. I'm seeing everything from 10-person startups (Sunsama, Slate Flosser) to massive enterprises with ,000+ employees (Walmart, Google, Home Depot). However, the majority cluster in the 50-1,000 employee range, suggesting growing mid-market companies. Many have raised significant funding (Series B through F rounds), while others are bootstrapped or post-IPO. This tells me Impact serves companies across the full growth spectrum, but particularly those in scaling mode.
Alternatives and Competitors to Impact
Explore vendors that are alternatives in this category