Companies that use hh2

Source: Analysis of job postings that mention hh2 (using the Bloomberry Jobs API)

My analysis shows that HH2 is primarily purchased by construction company finance and operations leadership. While only 6% of roles are at the leadership level, these directors and controllers are hiring teams of accountants (9%), payroll specialists (7%), and administrative staff (4%) to use the system. The buyers are focused on streamlining project accounting, managing multi-state payroll compliance, and improving job costing accuracy across construction projects.

The day-to-day users are construction accountants and payroll administrators who process timesheets, create owner billings, manage subcontractor payments, and allocate labor costs to specific projects. I noticed roles specifically mention tasks like "process Accounts Payable invoices using HH2," "manage timesheet approvals and import from HH2 to Sage," and "daily job functions related to system administration." These practitioners are coordinating between field operations and back-office functions, ensuring accurate project reporting and timely financial cycles.

The postings reveal companies struggling with construction-specific financial complexity. One role emphasized needing "hands-on construction payroll experience, strong knowledge of job costing, and a deep understanding of how payroll, labor burden, and workers' compensation directly impact project profitability." Another mentioned "ensuring accurate and timely preparation of journal entries, account reconciliations" and "accurate project reporting." Companies want to "drive insights and efficiencies" while maintaining compliance across multiple states and union classifications. The recurring theme is connecting field data to financial systems seamlessly.

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 898 companies that use hh2

I noticed that hh2 serves construction companies across nearly every specialty you can imagine. These aren't software companies or retailers. They're the firms actually building America's infrastructure: general contractors managing commercial projects, specialty subcontractors installing concrete, electrical systems, HVAC, plumbing, millwork, flooring, roofing, landscaping, and steel erection. Some focus on specific sectors like healthcare facilities, educational institutions, or automotive dealerships, while others handle diverse portfolios spanning office buildings, warehouses, retail spaces, and industrial plants.

These are established, mature businesses. The employee counts typically range from 11 to 500, with most clustering between 50 and 200 people. Many have been operating for decades, with founding dates in the 1970s, 1980s, or even earlier (one dates back to 1915, another to 1936). They describe themselves as "leading" or "premier" contractors in their regions, and several mention ENR rankings or industry awards. These aren't startups experimenting with business models. They're proven operators with deep market expertise.

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 898 companies that use hh2

I noticed that hh2 users are construction and field service companies that need to manage distributed workforces and complex projects. The combination of Procore (construction management) as the top correlation, along with Samsara (fleet and equipment tracking), tells me these are businesses with significant field operations, mobile workers, and physical assets to coordinate. They're not desk-based companies but rather organizations managing job sites, crews, and materials across multiple locations.

The pairing of Procore and Samsara makes perfect sense for construction contractors who need to track both project progress and the vehicles or equipment moving between sites. BambooHR appearing 48.8 times more often suggests these companies have substantial hourly workforces that require careful time tracking and HR management, which aligns with construction's labor-intensive nature. Egnyte's strong correlation indicates they need secure document sharing for blueprints, permits, and compliance documents that field teams must access remotely. The presence of Microsoft Defender for Business tells me they're taking security seriously despite being in a traditionally less tech-savvy industry, likely due to handling sensitive project data and client information.

The full stack reveals operationally focused companies rather than sales or product-led organizations. They're investing in tools that make existing operations more efficient, not primarily in customer acquisition technology. These appear to be established businesses at growth or maturity stage, with enough scale to justify specialized software but still pragmatic about their choices. The emphasis on workforce management, document security, and field coordination over marketing tools suggests they win business through relationships and execution quality rather than digital marketing.