We detected 106 companies using Hyperwallet. The most common industry is Software Development (14%) and the most common company size is 10,001+ employees (22%). We find new customers by discovering URLs with known URL patterns through web crawling or modifications to subprocessor lists.
Note: We also track companies that use Paypal here
Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 106 companies that use Hyperwallet
Company Characteristics
i
Shows how much more likely Hyperwallet customers are to have each trait compared to all companies. For example, 2.0x means customers are twice as likely to have that characteristic.
Trait
Likelihood
Company Size: 10,001+
70.5x
Company Size: 1,001-5,000
23.7x
Company Size: 501-1,000
19.4x
Industry: Software Development
12.6x
Country: United States
4.8x
I noticed that Hyperwallet's customers fall into three distinct categories that all share a common need for mass payouts. First, there are marketplace and gig economy platforms like DoorDash, Fiverr, Uber-style services, and freelance networks that need to pay thousands of independent contractors quickly. Second, I see direct selling and MLM companies including doTERRA, Amway, Neora, and Yanbal that manage vast networks of independent distributors. Third, there are traditional enterprises like Walmart, Meta, and airlines that likely use Hyperwallet for affiliate programs, rebates, or contractor payments.
These are predominantly mature, scaled companies. I see Post-IPO giants like Meta, Walmart, and Expedia Group alongside established private companies with 1,000 to 10,000 plus employees. The funding stages range widely, but employee counts tell the real story. Most have the complexity that comes with scale: global operations, multiple countries, massive user or distributor bases. Even the smaller companies often mention serving millions of customers or managing thousands of partners.
🔧 What other technologies do Hyperwallet customers also use?
Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 106 companies that use Hyperwallet
Commonly Paired Technologies
i
Shows how much more likely Hyperwallet customers are to use each tool compared to the general population. For example, 287x means customers are 287 times more likely to use that tool.
I noticed that Hyperwallet users operate platform business models where they need to pay out large numbers of external contributors, creators, or service providers. The combination of creator management tools like CreatorIQ and Impact (an affiliate marketing platform) alongside customer experience platforms tells me these are marketplace and platform companies managing complex networks of independent workers or content creators who need efficient mass payouts.
The pairing of CreatorIQ with Hyperwallet makes immediate sense. Companies managing influencer campaigns need to pay hundreds or thousands of creators across different countries, each with their own payment preferences. Similarly, Impact appearing so frequently suggests affiliate and partnership programs where businesses compensate external marketers. Corrigo, a field service management tool, points to companies coordinating independent contractors or technicians who complete jobs and need quick payment. These tools all create the same challenge: how do you efficiently pay masses of non-employees?
The presence of sophisticated feedback platforms like Qualtrics and Medallia reveals these companies are mature enough to invest heavily in understanding customer and partner satisfaction. This isn't scrappy startup territory. These are growth-stage or established companies with the resources to run comprehensive experience programs. The addition of Decagon AI for customer service automation suggests high transaction volumes that require scaling support operations. This stack screams operations-focused companies that have moved past product-market fit and are now optimizing complex, high-volume workflows.
Alternatives and Competitors to Hyperwallet
Explore vendors that are alternatives in this category