Companies that use Hackerone

Source: Analysis of 100 job postings that mention Hackerone

My analysis shows that HackerOne is primarily purchased by security leadership roles, with Directors and VPs of Information Security driving buying decisions across organizations from startups to Fortune 500 companies. These leaders are focused on scaling security programs without proportionally scaling headcount, managing compliance requirements like SOC 2 and ISO 27001, and staying ahead of emerging threats across cloud, API, and AI systems. Their strategic priorities center on building comprehensive vulnerability management programs that can handle modern, distributed architectures.

The day-to-day users are overwhelmingly security engineers and analysts who manage HackerOne as their vulnerability disclosure and bug bounty platform. These practitioners spend their time triaging incoming reports, validating vulnerabilities, reproducing issues in controlled environments, coordinating remediation with development teams, and maintaining relationships with external security researchers. They integrate HackerOne into broader security workflows alongside tools like Burp Suite, Wiz, and SIEM platforms.

I noticed recurring themes around managing vulnerability intake at scale and bridging security and development teams. Companies specifically mention needing to "manage intake from bug bounty platforms" and "coordinate with development teams to prioritize and remediate findings in a timely manner." Multiple postings emphasize "right-sizing severity" and creating "actionable reports," revealing that organizations struggle with prioritization and want to move beyond just collecting vulnerabilities to actually fixing them efficiently.

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 490 companies that use Hackerone

I noticed that companies using HackerOne tend to be high-growth technology companies that take both security and operational efficiency extremely seriously. The presence of tools like Docker Business and Watershed alongside HackerOne suggests these are mature tech organizations running sophisticated cloud infrastructure while also tracking their environmental impact. They're not just building products, they're building them responsibly at scale.

The pairing of HackerOne with UserTesting is particularly revealing. These companies are simultaneously stress-testing their security through bug bounties while gathering detailed user feedback on their products. This dual focus suggests a product-led growth motion where both security and user experience are competitive advantages, not afterthoughts. The high correlation with Golinks points to companies large enough that internal knowledge management has become critical. When your team needs a URL shortening system just to navigate internal resources, you're dealing with substantial organizational complexity.

The presence of Decagon AI, a customer service automation platform, alongside these other tools paints a picture of companies managing significant customer volumes while trying to maintain efficiency. These aren't early-stage startups figuring things out. They're growth-stage or mature companies dealing with scale challenges across multiple dimensions: security threats, customer support loads, internal collaboration, and infrastructure complexity.

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 490 companies that use Hackerone

I noticed that HackerOne's customers span an incredibly diverse range of industries, but they share a common thread: they operate digital infrastructure that millions of people depend on daily. These aren't just tech companies. I see financial institutions moving billions in transactions (Citi, Wells Fargo, Itaú Unibanco), consumer brands people interact with constantly (Starbucks, Peloton, Ferrero), entertainment platforms (DoorDash, FanDuel, Audible), and critical infrastructure providers (British Airways, Finnair, Vueling). What unites them is that they've built digital products or services where a security breach would be catastrophic to their brand, their customers, and their bottom line.

These are predominantly mature, established enterprises. I see Fortune 500 companies, publicly traded firms with Post IPO funding rounds, and businesses with 10,000+ employees dominating the list. Even the smaller companies tend to be well-funded (Series D, E, F rounds) or specialized players in critical sectors like defense. The presence of household names like Porsche, Dyson, PepsiCo, and the NBA tells me HackerOne attracts organizations where reputation risk is enormous.