Companies that use Cisco Email Security

Source: Analysis of 100 job postings that mention Cisco Email Security

My analysis shows that Cisco Email Security purchasing decisions are distributed across technical teams rather than concentrated in executive leadership. Systems Engineers (22%) and Security Analysts (18%) dominate the buyer landscape, followed by Systems Administrators (15%) and Network Engineers (12%). These are hands-on technical roles with purchasing influence, indicating that email security decisions happen at the engineering and operations level rather than C-suite. The prevalence of messaging specialists and infrastructure architects suggests organizations view email security as deeply integrated with their broader technology stack.

Day-to-day users are primarily security operations and infrastructure teams managing enterprise-scale email environments. I noticed practitioners are configuring email filtering policies, managing SMTP gateways, implementing authentication protocols like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, and integrating Cisco Email Security with SIEM platforms and threat intelligence tools. They're handling incident response for phishing attacks, tuning false positive rates, and maintaining hybrid environments that bridge on-premises Exchange with cloud platforms like Office 365.

The recurring pain points center on threat detection and compliance. Organizations repeatedly mention needing to "protect against phishing, malware, and business email compromise," "implement data loss prevention," and "ensure compliance with industry standards." One posting explicitly seeks someone to "develop email filtering policies to block spam and malicious content" while another emphasizes "mitigating email-based threats in complex environments." These companies are fighting increasingly sophisticated email attacks while managing the operational complexity of hybrid messaging infrastructures.

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 7,341 companies that use Cisco Email Security

I noticed that companies using Cisco Email Security are clearly enterprise organizations with a strong commitment to comprehensive security infrastructure. The dominant presence of other Cisco products like Secure Client, Webex, and Duo, combined with security-focused tools like Knowbe4, tells me these are large companies that prefer unified, vendor-consolidated security ecosystems rather than best-of-breed point solutions.

The pairing with Cisco Secure Client (61.8x more likely) and Cisco Duo (54.9x more likely) makes perfect sense because these companies are building integrated security architectures. They want their email security, VPN access, and multi-factor authentication all speaking the same language and managed through centralized dashboards. The strong correlation with Knowbe4 reveals these organizations take a layered approach to email threats, combining technical controls with security awareness training to address the human element. The presence of Dynatrace, despite appearing in fewer companies, shows the most sophisticated adopters are monitoring application performance at scale.

The full stack reveals these are established, enterprise-scale organizations operating with traditional IT procurement patterns. They're likely sales-led businesses given the presence of Webex for client communications and Docusign for contract workflows. These aren't scrappy startups using Google Workspace and Slack. They're mature companies with dedicated IT security teams, formal vendor relationships, and significant budgets for enterprise licensing agreements. The technology choices suggest organizations past their growth stage, focused on stability, compliance, and risk mitigation rather than rapid experimentation.

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 7,341 companies that use Cisco Email Security

I noticed that Cisco Email Security attracts a remarkably diverse set of organizations, but what unites them is operational complexity and institutional permanence. These aren't companies selling consumer apps or chasing viral growth. They're government agencies administering justice systems, financial institutions managing billions in assets, healthcare providers running hospital networks, manufacturing companies producing precision machinery, and established service providers with decades of history. Many operate critical infrastructure, whether it's airports, public transportation, utility services, or educational networks serving hundreds of thousands of students.

These are overwhelmingly mature enterprises. The employee counts cluster heavily in the 51-200 and 201-500 ranges, with substantial representation in the 1,000+ category. Very few show venture funding, and those that do are typically later-stage or debt financing rounds. The language itself signals maturity: they talk about decades of operation, extensive infrastructure networks, regulatory compliance, and managing large employee bases across multiple locations.