Companies that use Auditboard

Source: Analysis of 100 job postings that mention Auditboard

I noticed that AuditBoard is primarily purchased by senior audit and risk leaders, with Directors of Internal Audit making up 29% of these roles, followed by IT/Security Compliance Analysts at 14% and general Auditors at 11%. These buyers sit within Internal Audit, Risk & Compliance, and Finance functions. Their strategic priorities center on SOX compliance, enterprise risk management, and building scalable audit programs. Many postings emphasize standing up or modernizing audit functions, particularly around SOX 404 compliance, IT general controls, and operational audits.

The day-to-day users span a wider range: internal auditors executing test plans, SOX analysts documenting controls in AuditBoard, compliance teams managing evidence collection, and risk managers maintaining control frameworks. I found practitioners using AuditBoard for control testing, workpaper documentation, audit project management, tracking remediation activities, and centralizing risk and compliance data. Several postings specifically mention AuditBoard administration experience as desirable, suggesting organizations need dedicated platform owners to manage workflows and automation.

The pain points reveal organizations struggling with manual processes and seeking automation. One posting seeks someone to "drive further development, use, and standardization of Auditboard," while another emphasizes "advancing automation initiatives that support the group's strategic plan to modernize processes, reduce manual effort, and improve overall operational efficiency." A third describes needing to "design advanced workflows, automation, and metrics that centralize risk and compliance data." These companies want integrated GRC platforms that can scale with growth while reducing the administrative burden of compliance activities.

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 1,620 companies that use Auditboard

I noticed that companies using Auditboard are predominantly large, compliance-heavy enterprises focused on risk management and regulatory requirements. The presence of tools like Proofpoint Security Training and Navex One appearing hundreds of times more frequently than average tells me these are organizations where governance, risk, and compliance aren't nice-to-haves but core operational requirements. These companies likely operate in heavily regulated industries like financial services, healthcare, or public companies subject to SOX compliance.

The pairing of Workday with Auditboard makes perfect sense. Companies implementing enterprise-grade HR systems like Workday are dealing with complex audit trails around employee data, access controls, and policy enforcement. Similarly, Watershed's presence suggests these companies are also managing ESG reporting and sustainability compliance, which increasingly requires the same rigorous documentation and audit processes. Qualtrics appearing frequently indicates these organizations are measuring stakeholder feedback systematically, likely part of broader governance frameworks around employee satisfaction, customer experience, and compliance monitoring.

The full stack reveals these are mature, sales-led enterprises with dedicated compliance, audit, and risk management teams. They're not startups experimenting with point solutions. They're established companies with 1,000-plus employees who've committed to best-in-class enterprise software across every function. The Workday Recruiting correlation reinforces this, as only larger companies invest in specialized recruiting platforms separate from their core HRIS. These organizations have the budgets and organizational complexity that justify dedicated audit management software rather than spreadsheets.

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 1,620 companies that use Auditboard

I noticed that AuditBoard customers are predominantly established enterprises operating in highly regulated, complex industries where compliance and risk management are critical. These aren't companies selling simple products. They're running massive operations: Coca-Cola distributing beverages globally, Sentara Health managing 12 hospitals, Zebra Technologies providing enterprise infrastructure solutions, BOK Financial handling $50 billion in assets, and Micron Technology manufacturing semiconductors. These organizations operate at scale with intricate, multi-layered operations that demand sophisticated governance.

These are decidedly mature enterprises, not startups. The signals are unmistakable: Fortune 500 rankings (Coca-Cola, Fidelity National Financial, Live Nation), public market listings across NYSE and NASDAQ, assets under management in the billions, and employee counts regularly exceeding 5,000. Many have multi-decade histories, like Central Insurance founded in 1876 or New Balance operating since 1906. Even the technology companies here are established players like UKG with 16,000+ employees, not seed-stage ventures.