We detected 125 customers using Weights and Biases Enterprise and 2 customers with upcoming renewal in the next 3 months. The most common industry is Software Development (38%) and the most common company size is 2-10 employees (32%). We find new customers by discovering URLs with known URL patterns through web crawling or modifications to subprocessor lists.
๐ฅ What types of companies is most likely to use Weights and Biases Enterprise?
Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 125 companies that use Weights and Biases Enterprise
I noticed that Weights and Biases Enterprise customers fall into three distinct camps. First, there are AI-native companies building foundation models, LLMs, and AI infrastructure (OpenAI, Mistral AI, Groq, Anyscale). Second, traditional enterprises embedding AI into existing products, from automotive manufacturers like BMW and Volkswagen to biotech firms like Recursion and Generate:Biomedicines. Third, software companies adding AI capabilities to established platforms like GitHub, Databricks, and Figma.
The funding and size data reveals a fascinating mix. I found everything from 2-person seed-stage startups like Inductive Bio to massive public companies like Amazon and Sony. However, the sweet spot appears to be Series B through Series D companies with 200-500 employees, plus established enterprises with 1,000+ employees investing heavily in AI capabilities. The presence of both cutting-edge AI startups and Fortune 500 giants suggests Weights and Biases appeals across maturity stages, but primarily to organizations doing serious, production-scale AI work.
๐ง What other technologies do Weights and Biases Enterprise customers also use?
Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 125 companies that use Weights and Biases Enterprise
Commonly Paired Technologies
i
Shows how much more likely Weights and Biases Enterprise customers are to use each tool compared to the general population. For example, 287x means customers are 287 times more likely to use that tool.
I noticed that companies using Weights and Biases Enterprise tend to be well-funded, growth-stage technology companies building AI and machine learning products. The presence of tools like Statsig, Drift Premium, and UserTesting suggests these aren't just using ML internally, they're building customer-facing products where model performance directly impacts user experience and business outcomes.
The pairing with Golinks is particularly revealing. When 33 companies invest in internal link shortening infrastructure, it signals they've reached a scale where knowledge management becomes critical. These teams are large enough that engineers need quick ways to navigate documentation, dashboards, and internal tools. Statsig appearing alongside Weights and Biases makes perfect sense too. Both tools serve companies that treat experimentation as core infrastructure, running constant A/B tests on their models and features. The Docker Business correlation reinforces that these companies have sophisticated deployment pipelines and are managing complex containerized ML workflows in production.
My analysis shows these are decidedly sales-led organizations despite their technical sophistication. Drift Premium and UserTesting aren't cheap tools, they signal companies investing heavily in enterprise sales motions and customer research. Glean's presence (an expensive enterprise search tool) further confirms these are well-capitalized companies with large enough teams that internal search becomes a pain point worth solving. They're likely Series B and beyond, past the scrappy startup phase and into scaling mode with dedicated go-to-market teams.
Alternatives and Competitors to Weights and Biases Enterprise
Explore vendors that are alternatives in this category