Companies that use TeamMate Audit Management

Source: Analysis of 100 job postings that mention TeamMate Audit Management

My analysis shows that Internal Auditors (39%) and Directors of Internal Audit (17%) make up the majority of roles mentioning TeamMate. The buyer profile skews toward internal audit leadership, particularly Directors and VPs who are responsible for department transformation and risk assessment programs. These leaders are hiring for risk-based audit planning, continuous monitoring capabilities, and SOX compliance expertise, indicating they're investing in audit management technology to modernize their functions.

The day-to-day users are primarily individual contributor auditors who leverage TeamMate for documentation, workpaper management, and audit execution. I noticed practitioners use the platform for risk assessments, control testing, sample tracking, and report generation across operational, financial, IT, and compliance audits. Several postings mention data analytics integration, suggesting users are combining TeamMate with tools like ACL Analytics and Power BI to automate testing and analyze large data volumes.

The recurring pain points center on efficiency and transformation. Organizations want to "transform internal audit into a world-class assurance organization" and "optimize efficiency and effectiveness" through automation. Multiple postings emphasize "continuous improvement," "continuous auditing," and the need to "simplify, standardize and automate data." Companies are clearly looking to move beyond manual processes toward predictive, data-driven audit programs that provide better insights with fewer resources.

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 489 companies that use TeamMate Audit Management

I noticed that companies using TeamMate Audit Management are primarily large, heavily regulated enterprises with sophisticated governance, risk, and compliance programs. The presence of tools like Collibra, SailPoint Identity Cloud, and Navex One reveals these are organizations managing complex data governance frameworks and enterprise-wide compliance requirements. This combination tells me we're looking at Fortune 500 companies or similarly sized institutions, likely in financial services, healthcare, or other highly regulated industries.

The pairing of TeamMate with Collibra is particularly revealing. Collibra handles data governance and cataloging, while TeamMate manages audit processes. Together, they suggest these companies are running comprehensive programs where audit teams need to verify data lineage, access controls, and regulatory compliance across massive data estates. Similarly, SailPoint for identity governance paired with TeamMate indicates these organizations are auditing user access and permissions regularly, probably driven by SOX compliance or similar regulatory requirements. The ServiceNow correlation makes sense too because audit findings need to flow into enterprise service management workflows for remediation tracking.

The full stack reveals these are definitively enterprise-led, sales-driven organizations. The presence of Adobe Audience Manager and Qualtrics suggests they're large enough to have sophisticated marketing operations and customer experience programs that themselves require audit oversight. These aren't startups or mid-market companies. They're mature enterprises with dedicated internal audit departments, likely with 50 to 500 person audit teams managing hundreds of audits annually. The investment in this particular combination of expensive enterprise tools indicates late-stage or fully mature companies with substantial compliance budgets.

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 489 companies that use TeamMate Audit Management

I noticed that TeamMate Audit Management customers are predominantly large, established financial institutions and regulated enterprises. These companies operate banks, insurance providers, pension funds, utilities, government agencies, and multinational corporations. They handle sensitive assets like customer deposits, insurance premiums, pension funds, or critical infrastructure. Many are in sectors with strict regulatory oversight: banking (Danske Bank, Julius Baer, Alliance Bank Malaysia), insurance (Sukoon Insurance, Acenda, Tokio Marine), government entities (City of Amsterdam, Palm Beach County Clerk), and utilities (Tabreed, Cavotec).

These are unmistakably mature enterprises. The employee counts are telling: most have 500 to 10,000+ employees, with many exceeding decades of operational history. Brightstar Lottery has "approximately 6,000 employees," Danske Bank employs 18,452 people, and AbbVie has nearly 60,000. These aren't startups testing product-market fit. They have established branch networks, complex regulatory requirements, and multi-generational customer relationships. Several are publicly traded or mention their stock exchange listings.