Companies that use Odoo

Source: Analysis of 100 job postings that mention Odoo

My analysis reveals that Odoo purchasing decisions are dominated by finance leadership, with Heads of Finance representing 20% of roles, CFOs at 11%, and Directors of Finance at 9%. These buyers are focused on digital transformation and system consolidation. I noticed repeated emphasis on implementing robust financial infrastructure, with roles requiring expertise in consolidating multi-entity financials, managing P&L responsibilities, and driving procurement optimization. Engineering leaders, particularly Heads of Engineering at 7%, also play a key purchasing role, seeking to integrate Odoo across their tech stacks for operational efficiency.

The day-to-day users span a wide operational spectrum. Odoo Developers at 6% handle customization and module configuration, while Revenue Operations Managers, ERP Specialists, and Manufacturing Engineers actively use the platform for inventory accounting, procurement workflows, and production planning. I observed roles managing everything from "accounts payable and receivable functions" to "manufacturing execution systems" and "client onboarding" processes, indicating Odoo serves as a comprehensive operational backbone rather than a single-function tool.

The core pain points center on fragmentation and scalability. Companies describe needing to "unify fragmented data systems into a cohesive platform" and establish "standardized processes across multiple entities." One posting seeks someone to "transform and lead the financial backbone" while another emphasizes "automating data analysis pipelines" and achieving "end-to-end financial operations." These organizations are clearly moving away from disconnected legacy systems toward integrated, scalable infrastructure that supports rapid growth across international operations.

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 3,442 companies that use Odoo

I noticed something fascinating about Odoo users: they're predominantly technical, self-service companies that prefer open-source solutions and hands-on infrastructure management. The overwhelming presence of tools like GitLab, N8N, and Portainer tells me these aren't companies buying enterprise software through traditional sales cycles. They're building and customizing their own solutions.

The pairing of Odoo with N8N is particularly revealing. N8N is an open-source workflow automation tool, which suggests these companies are connecting Odoo to other systems themselves rather than paying for pre-built integrations. Similarly, GitLab's strong presence indicates they're likely modifying Odoo's source code or building custom modules. Portainer appearing 70 times more often than normal confirms they're running containerized infrastructure and managing their own deployments. These companies want control over their stack.

The combination of Grafana for monitoring and Google Search Console for web traffic analysis shows a data-driven operations mindset. These aren't just technical companies, they're measurement-focused ones that instrument everything. The relatively high presence of Intune suggests many are B2B companies with distributed teams needing device management, though they're still choosing self-managed solutions where possible.

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 3,442 companies that use Odoo

I noticed that Odoo attracts incredibly diverse businesses united by operational complexity rather than industry. These companies manufacture machinery (AF Compressors, Alimar Generator), distribute wholesale goods (Fisura, Elektro3, Grandor), provide specialized services (Labtim's laboratory equipment, Ca' Zampa's veterinary clinics, Johnson Crane Hire), and run everything from insurance brokerages to solar installation franchises. What stands out is how many touch physical products or field operations requiring inventory management, supply chains, and coordination across multiple locations.

These are predominantly established, revenue-generating businesses rather than early startups. The employee counts cluster between 11-500, with many in the 50-200 range. Most mention years or decades of operation (Sacine's "40 años de trayectoria," De Candido starting in 1956). Very few list funding rounds, and when they do, it's modest seed funding. The signals point to profitable SMBs and mid-market companies that have crossed the threshold where spreadsheets break down but aren't large enough for SAP. They're at the stage where they need real systems but want flexibility and cost control.