Companies that use Linear

Source: Analysis of 100 job postings that mention Linear

I noticed that Linear buyers span primarily leadership roles across commercial operations, with Directors of Data Science (15%), Account Directors (10%), and Vice Presidents of Sales (8%) leading procurement decisions. The hiring patterns reveal organizations prioritizing data-driven decision making, cross-functional collaboration, and multi-platform revenue growth. These leaders are building teams focused on bridging strategic planning with operational execution, particularly in fast-moving environments where they need to manage complex projects across distributed teams.

The day-to-day users appear to be product managers, engineers, strategists, and commercial teams who need to coordinate work across multiple stakeholders. References to needing tools for "non-linear" thinking, managing "complex programmes," and driving "integrated strategic planning" suggest teams using Linear to handle sophisticated workflows that don't follow traditional hierarchical structures. The emphasis on collaboration between product, engineering, and business functions indicates Linear supports cross-disciplinary coordination.

The pain points center on managing complexity at scale and enabling faster execution. Job descriptions repeatedly mention needs for "transforming ideas into shipped software," creating "linear and cohesive communication strategy," and building "high-performing teams" that can "move quickly yet thoughtfully." Companies are seeking people who can "translate complex business questions into actionable insights" and "drive decisions and continuously optimize performance," revealing organizations struggling to maintain clarity and momentum as they grow.

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 19,781 companies that use Linear

I noticed that Linear users are overwhelmingly modern software companies building products for other developers or technical teams. The presence of Sentry, Vercel, and Retool together paints a clear picture: these are engineering-first organizations shipping software rapidly and prioritizing developer experience in their operations.

The Sentry and Linear pairing makes perfect sense because both tools serve teams that want elegant, fast interfaces for traditionally clunky workflows. Companies using both are likely managing substantial production applications where incident tracking needs to flow seamlessly into sprint planning. The Retool correlation is particularly telling since it suggests these companies build internal tools to move faster, rather than relying on off-the-shelf enterprise software. When I see Vercel in the mix, it confirms these teams favor modern deployment infrastructure and likely build with JavaScript frameworks. They want their operations stack to be as sleek as their deployment pipeline.

The full stack reveals product-led companies in growth stage, probably Series A through C. They have real production systems that need monitoring (Sentry, Cloudflare Zero Trust), actual customers generating product analytics (Amplitude), and enough complexity to warrant customer support infrastructure (Jira Service Desk). But they haven't yet succumbed to enterprise bloat. These companies sell primarily to technical buyers who evaluate products through trials and proof of concept rather than through traditional sales cycles.

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 19,781 companies that use Linear

I noticed that Linear's users span an incredibly wide range of industries, from software development and IT consulting firms to healthcare companies, manufacturing operations, financial services, and even circus schools. What unites them isn't what they build, but that they're building something complex that requires coordinated team effort. These are companies managing intricate projects, whether that's developing AI platforms, running clinical trials, coordinating construction projects, or scaling e-commerce operations.

These companies cluster in the 11-200 employee range, with a sweet spot around 50-150 people. Many are Series A or Series B funded startups, though there's also a significant contingent of bootstrapped companies and a few larger enterprises in the 200-500 range. The funding stages and employee counts suggest companies in their scaling phase, past the chaotic early days but not yet massive organizations. They're at the point where informal coordination breaks down and they need real project management tools.