We detected 871,503 customers using Google Tag Manager and 7,287 customers with estimated renewals in the next 3 months. The most common industry is Retail (20%) and the most common company size is 2-10 employees (27%). Our methodology involves detecting JavaScript snippets or configurations on customer websites.
Note: We are unable to detect churned customers for this vendor, only new customers
About Google Tag Manager
Google Tag Manager enables marketers and developers to manage and deploy website tracking tags like analytics and advertising pixels through a web interface without editing source code. Users can configure triggers and variables to control when tags fire, streamlining implementation of tools like Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and other marketing measurement codes.
📊 Who in an organization decides to buy or use Google Tag Manager?
Source: Analysis of 100 job postings that mention Google Tag Manager
Job titles that mention Google Tag Manager
i
Based on an analysis of job titles from postings that mention Google Tag Manager.
Job Title
Share
Director of Marketing
18%
Director of Analytics
14%
Director of Digital Marketing
12%
Head of Marketing
10%
I noticed that Google Tag Manager buyers are predominantly marketing and analytics leaders, with Directors of Marketing (18%), Directors of Analytics (14%), and Directors of Digital Marketing (12%) leading the purchasing decisions. These leaders are focused on building data-driven marketing infrastructures, with strategic priorities around customer acquisition, conversion optimization, and proving marketing ROI. Many are establishing or scaling digital capabilities, particularly in performance marketing and lifecycle management.
The day-to-day users are a technical layer beneath these leaders: data analysts, web analysts, marketing technologists, and digital specialists who implement tracking solutions, manage tag configurations, validate data accuracy, and create dashboards. These practitioners use Google Tag Manager alongside GA4, BigQuery, and various marketing automation platforms to ensure proper event tracking, manage conversion pixels, and maintain data quality across customer journeys. They're the ones doing the hands-on work of building taxonomies, configuring triggers, and troubleshooting implementation issues.
The core pain points revolve around measurement accuracy and marketing effectiveness. Companies want to "ensure accurate, privacy-compliant data collection" and "translate data into actionable intelligence." Multiple postings emphasize the need to "reduce losses of data and increase the reliability of attributions" while maintaining "data quality, integrability and actionable outcomes." There's a clear theme of organizations trying to move from siloed, unreliable tracking to comprehensive, trustworthy measurement systems that can actually inform strategic decisions and optimize spending across channels.
🔧 What other technologies do Google Tag Manager customers also use?
Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 871,503 companies that use Google Tag Manager
Commonly Paired Technologies
i
Shows how much more likely Google Tag Manager customers are to use each tool compared to the general population. For example, 287x means customers are 287 times more likely to use that tool.
I noticed that Google Tag Manager users are overwhelmingly marketing-driven companies focused on digital commerce and customer acquisition. The extreme correlation with Google Analytics (814x more likely) and Facebook Ads (509x more likely) tells me these businesses live and die by their ability to track, measure, and optimize online customer journeys. They're not just dabbling in digital marketing – they're building their entire growth engine around it.
The pairing of Shopify (483x more likely) with Facebook Ads and Google Analytics reveals a classic e-commerce playbook. These companies are running paid social campaigns, tracking every click and conversion through their funnel, and using Tag Manager to stitch it all together without needing developer resources. The appearance of Yoast (680x more likely) alongside Google Search Console confirms they're also investing heavily in organic search, suggesting a balanced approach between paid and owned channels. Microsoft Clarity's presence shows they're going beyond basic analytics to understand actual user behavior through session recordings and heatmaps.
My analysis shows these are marketing-led organizations, likely in growth stage where speed and agility matter more than enterprise-grade infrastructure. They need to launch campaigns quickly, test new channels, and make data-driven decisions without waiting on engineering teams. Tag Manager solves a critical bottleneck by letting marketers deploy tracking codes themselves. The heavy emphasis on measurement tools suggests they operate on relatively thin margins where optimization isn't optional – they need to know their CAC, conversion rates, and ROAS down to the decimal point.
👥 What types of companies is most likely to use Google Tag Manager?
Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 871,503 companies that use Google Tag Manager
Company Characteristics
i
Shows how much more likely Google Tag Manager customers are to have each trait compared to all companies. For example, 2.0x means customers are twice as likely to have that characteristic.
Trait
Likelihood
Funding Stage: Private equity
6.4x
Funding Stage: Grant
6.0x
Funding Stage: Debt financing
6.0x
Company Size: 1,001-5,000
4.2x
Company Size: 51-200
4.1x
Industry: Primary and Secondary Education
2.9x
I noticed Google Tag Manager users span an incredibly diverse range of businesses, but they share a common thread: they're companies that need to connect with customers through digital channels. These aren't purely digital-native businesses. I'm seeing construction firms, insurance companies, food manufacturers, ski clubs, hospitals, and port authorities alongside the expected tech startups and e-commerce players. What unites them is that regardless of whether they're selling solar panels, legal services, or restaurant meals, they maintain a digital presence that requires tracking and optimization.
The company stage distribution surprised me. While there are a handful of funded startups like SPECTRA (Seed, $3.6M) and umony (Series A, $15M), the vast majority appear to be established businesses. I'm seeing employee counts ranging from 11-50 to 500+ with no funding information listed, suggesting profitable, mature operations. Many explicitly mention decades of operation. These aren't companies experimenting with digital, they're integrating it into existing business models.