Companies that use Clickup

Source: Analysis of 100 job postings that mention Clickup

I noticed that ClickUp buyers are overwhelmingly operational and project-focused leaders. Directors of Operations (20%) and Project Managers (17%) dominate the purchasing landscape, followed by marketing directors (9%) and creative directors (7%). These leaders are hiring for roles that emphasize cross-functional coordination, system building, and scaling operations. Their strategic priorities center on creating structure from chaos, establishing accountability frameworks, and enabling rapid growth without adding complexity.

The day-to-day users span a remarkably broad range: project managers tracking deliverables and dependencies, operations teams managing workflows and resource allocation, marketing teams coordinating campaigns and content calendars, and creative teams organizing assets and production schedules. Practitioners use ClickUp to maintain task lists, run sprint planning, generate status reports, coordinate between departments, and keep distributed teams aligned on priorities and timelines.

The pain points are strikingly consistent across postings. Companies want to move from "reactive to strategic" and need someone who can "build order out of chaos." Multiple roles emphasize the need to "turn vision into action" and create "scalable, repeatable workflows." One operations director role explicitly seeks someone to "design, implement, and optimize operational systems" that support "sustained, predictable growth." Another emphasizes maintaining "clean and updated documentation" while providing "timely updates" and highlighting "blockers or wins." The underlying theme is clear: these organizations are scaling fast and need ClickUp to impose structure, visibility, and accountability across increasingly complex operations.

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 241 companies that use Clickup

I noticed that ClickUp users tend to be mid-market or enterprise companies dealing with complex compliance, risk management, and operational workflows. The presence of tools like Archer IRM, Vertex Tax Compliance, and Auditboard tells me these are organizations facing significant regulatory requirements and need to coordinate work across multiple departments with strict documentation needs.

The pairing of ClickUp with Qualtrics is particularly revealing. These companies are collecting structured feedback and experience data, then need to turn those insights into actionable projects and tasks. Similarly, the Brandfolder correlation suggests marketing and creative teams managing substantial digital asset libraries while coordinating campaigns and content production. The Forethought pairing indicates these companies are supporting customers at scale and likely routing support insights back into product or operational improvements tracked in ClickUp.

My analysis shows these are companies in the growth to mature stage, likely between 200 and 2,000 employees. They're operations-led organizations where cross-functional coordination matters more than pure velocity. The compliance tools suggest they're in regulated industries like financial services, healthcare, or enterprise SaaS. They need audit trails and process documentation, not just speed. The combination of customer feedback tools, asset management, and AI-powered support suggests they're balancing growth initiatives with increasing operational complexity.

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 241 companies that use Clickup

I noticed that ClickUp's typical customers span an impressively diverse range of industries, but they share a common thread: complexity. These aren't simple operations. They're companies managing multifaceted workflows across technology platforms (like Procore's construction software or Sprinklr's customer experience management), physical operations (like Sempra's energy infrastructure or Allegion's security products), professional services (like Baker Tilly's accounting or ID Medical's healthcare staffing), and hybrid models that blend software with services. Many are either building technology products themselves or using technology to transform traditional industries.

The employee counts and funding stages reveal a sweet spot: mostly growth-stage companies scaling operations. I see a concentration in the 50-500 employee range, with representation from both earlier stage firms (Series B/C funding) and mature enterprises (10,000+ employees). These aren't garage startups figuring out product-market fit, nor are they rigid bureaucracies. They're in that messy middle where complexity explodes: multiple teams, cross-functional projects, distributed workforces, and ambitious growth targets.