Companies that use Airtable

Source: Analysis of 100 job postings that mention Airtable

I noticed that Airtable buyers cluster heavily around operational leadership roles. Directors of Operations represent 18% of the sample, followed by Program Managers at 14% and Directors of Marketing at 12%. These leaders share common priorities: they're building scalable systems, managing cross-functional workflows, and driving organizational transformation. They're hiring for roles that require process optimization, project management rigor, and the ability to translate strategy into execution across distributed teams.

The day-to-day users span a remarkably wide range: project managers tracking campaign deliverables, operations coordinators managing supplier onboarding programs, creative producers organizing asset workflows, and partnership managers coordinating multi-stakeholder initiatives. I found Airtable mentioned alongside tools like ClickUp, Monday.com, and HubSpot, suggesting it serves as a flexible database and workflow engine for teams that need more structure than spreadsheets but more customization than rigid enterprise software.

The core pain point threading through these postings is the need to create order from complexity at scale. Companies want to "build scalable systems" and "ensure operational excellence" while maintaining "transparency and alignment." One posting seeks someone to "design, implement, and optimize operational systems, workflows, and processes that allow the team to scale efficiently." Another emphasizes "structured progress updates, risks, and insights" across multiple markets. These organizations are growing fast and need infrastructure that can flex with them, not lock them into predetermined workflows.

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 4,748 companies that use Airtable

I noticed something fascinating about Airtable users: they're collaborative, process-driven companies that rely heavily on visual workflows and cross-functional coordination. The presence of tools like Miro, Figma, and Asana at such dramatically higher rates tells me these are teams that need to move fast, stay aligned, and translate ideas into execution without heavy IT involvement.

The Miro and Figma pairing is particularly revealing. These are companies where design, product, and operations teams work closely together, likely in a highly iterative environment. They're brainstorming in Miro, designing in Figma, and then using Airtable to track projects and manage the resulting workflows. The Docusign correlation makes sense here too. When you're moving quickly from concept to execution, you need fast approvals and digital signature capabilities to keep deals and partnerships flowing without bottlenecks.

What strikes me most is the combination of Zoom Business with ChatGPT for Teams. These companies operate in a remote or distributed environment where async and sync communication both matter enormously. They're investing in AI to augment productivity while maintaining human connection through video. This isn't a sales-led motion with heavy CRM investment. It's more product-led and operations-focused, with teams that need flexible systems they can configure themselves.

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 4,748 companies that use Airtable

I noticed that Airtable users span an incredibly wide range of activities, from financial services and construction to music publishing and healthcare. What connects them is operational complexity: these companies manage multi-step processes, coordinate across teams, track projects with many moving parts, or handle intricate client relationships. They're not selling simple products. They're running sports camps with hundreds of locations, managing construction projects across multiple states, coordinating talent rosters, or tracking complex insurance claims and certifications.

These are predominantly established companies in growth or mature phases. The majority have 11-200 employees, with many in the 51-200 range. They're past the scrappy startup phase but not yet massive enterprises. Many mention decades of experience ("founded in 1975," "over 40 years") or describe themselves as "leaders" in their space. The funded companies show modest rounds rather than unicorn-level capital. They have multiple office locations, established client bases, and complex service offerings that have evolved over time.