Companies that use Lovable

Analyzed and validated by Henley Wing Chiu
All low code development Lovable

Lovable We detected 1,105 companies using Lovable. The most common industry is Software Development (24%) and the most common company size is 51-200 employees (30%). We find new customers by monitoring new entries and modifications to company DNS records. Note: We track companies on a paid Lovable plan that publish a Lovable app on their domain

⏱️ Data is delayed by 1 month. To show real-time data, sign up for a free trial or login
Company Employees Industry Region YoY Headcount Growth Usage Start Date
Papaya Dash 11–50 Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage GB N/A 2026-03-18
Forefront 501–1,000 IT Services and IT Consulting SE N/A 2026-03-18
Ida Infront AB 51–200 IT System Custom Software Development SE N/A 2026-03-18
OnDeck Australia 51–200 Financial Services AU N/A 2026-03-18
WhiteBridge.ai 11–50 Data Security Software Products LT N/A 2026-03-18
OakNorth 501–1,000 Financial Services GB N/A 2026-03-18
Phact B.V. 51–200 Information Technology & Services NL N/A 2026-03-18
Interglass 51–200 Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage US N/A 2026-03-18
WOW Tech Group 201–500 Computers and Electronics Manufacturing DE N/A 2026-03-18
ARFFMAN 201–500 Education Administration Programs FI N/A 2026-03-18
Accurx 201–500 Software Development GB N/A 2026-03-18
RocketReach 51–200 Information Services US N/A 2026-03-18
MoEngage 501–1,000 Technology, Information and Internet US N/A 2026-03-17
Chrono24 201–500 Retail Luxury Goods and Jewelry DE N/A 2026-03-17
Weel 51–200 Financial Services AU N/A 2026-03-17
Aviva 1,001–5,000 Leisure, Travel & Tourism BR N/A 2026-03-17
Doctolib 1,001–5,000 Software Development FR N/A 2026-03-17
Accelerate People 11–50 Higher Education GB N/A 2026-03-17
Savills North America 501–1,000 Real Estate US N/A 2026-03-17
Showing 1-50 of 2,769

Market Insights

🏢 Top Industries

Software Development 198 (24%)
IT Services and IT Consulting 99 (12%)
Financial Services 58 (7%)
Technology, Information and Internet 50 (6%)
Information Technology & Services 22 (3%)

📏 Company Size Distribution

51-200 employees 263 (30%)
201-500 employees 172 (20%)
11-50 employees 169 (20%)
1,001-5,000 employees 89 (10%)
501-1,000 employees 83 (10%)

📊 Who usually uses Lovable and for what use cases?

Source: Analysis of job postings that mention Lovable (using the Bloomberry Jobs API)

Job titles that mention Lovable
i
Job Title
Share
Head of Design
14%
Director, Product Management
10%
Product Manager
9%
Director, Marketing
6%
I noticed that Lovable buyers span both leadership and individual contributor roles, with a strong concentration in product and design functions. The top purchasers include Heads of Design (14%), Directors of Product Management (10%), and Product Managers (9%), suggesting Lovable is adopted by teams focused on rapid product development and design execution. These leaders are hiring for AI-native capabilities, seeking candidates who can "build rapidly, ship often and iterate based on real feedback" and transform ideas into working products quickly.

The day-to-day users are predominantly designers, product managers, and no-code specialists who leverage Lovable alongside tools like Figma, Webflow, and Framer. Several postings explicitly mention Lovable as part of their core toolkit, with practitioners using it to "assemble landing pages and creative assets" and "generate UI solutions" without traditional designer dependencies. Growth marketers and AI engineers also appear as hands-on users, building prototypes and campaign materials at speed.

The core pain point emerging across these roles is the need for velocity without sacrificing quality. Companies want teams who can "rapidly prototype" and achieve "sub-second container startups" while building "lovable, lasting products." One posting seeks someone who can "turn complexity into experiences" and another emphasizes "building AI-first solutions" that deliver immediate business value. The common thread is eliminating bottlenecks in the design-to-development pipeline, allowing teams to move from concept to production in hours rather than weeks.

👥 What types of companies use Lovable?

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 1,105 companies that use Lovable

Company Characteristics
i
Trait
Likelihood
Funding Stage: Secondary market
178.6x
Funding Stage: Series C
113.7x
Funding Stage: Series D
99.1x
Country: SE
19.5x
Country: FI
18.3x
Industry: Software Development
16.1x
I noticed Lovable attracts an incredibly diverse range of companies across industries, from digital challengers and tech platforms to traditional businesses undergoing transformation. What unifies them is motion. These are companies building, modernizing, or scaling digital products. I see healthcare tech companies creating patient platforms, fintech startups reimagining payments, e-commerce businesses expanding globally, and established enterprises like OpenText and HERE Technologies modernizing their digital infrastructure. Many are creating customer-facing applications, internal tools, or marketplace platforms that require rapid development.

The funding and scale data tells an interesting story. While there are post-IPO giants like OpenText, JFrog, and LegalZoom, the majority cluster in that growth zone: Series A through Series C startups, companies with 50-500 employees, and established mid-market firms modernizing their tech stack. Many have recent funding rounds between $5M and $50M. I also noticed numerous bootstrapped or non-venture companies, particularly in Europe and emerging markets, suggesting Lovable appeals beyond the typical Silicon Valley VC-backed startup.

🔧 What other technologies do Lovable customers also use?

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 1,105 companies that use Lovable

Commonly Paired Technologies
i
Technology
Likelihood
4019.9x
515.1x
460.7x
292.2x
102.0x
64.1x
I noticed something striking about Lovable users: they're building companies in the age of AI assistance. The overwhelming presence of Cursor, Claude for Work, and ChatGPT for Teams tells me these aren't just companies using AI tools, they're fundamentally AI-native organizations where artificial intelligence is woven into daily work. Combined with automation platforms like Zapier Enterprise and collaboration tools like Atlassian Cloud, this suggests fast-moving teams that prioritize velocity and efficiency over traditional development processes.

The Cursor and Lovable pairing makes perfect sense. Both tools accelerate development through AI, so companies using Lovable for rapid application building are also using Cursor to write code faster. The high correlation with Claude for Work and ChatGPT for Teams reinforces this: these teams aren't just using AI for coding, they're using it across the entire organization for writing, analysis, and decision-making. Zapier Enterprise appearing 460 times more often suggests these companies prefer to automate and integrate rather than build everything custom, which aligns perfectly with Lovable's low-code philosophy.

The full stack reveals product-led companies in early to growth stages. They're moving fast, likely pre-Series A or Series B startups that need to validate ideas quickly without large engineering teams. The emphasis on AI tools and automation over enterprise sales software suggests they're building products first and worrying about complex go-to-market motions later. These are lean, tech-forward teams that value speed to market.

Alternatives and Competitors to Lovable

Explore vendors that are alternatives in this category

QuickBase QuickBase Airtable Airtable Coda Coda Salesforce Experience Cloud Salesforce Experience Cloud Appian Appian Tulip Tulip Replit Replit Lovable Lovable

Loading data...