We detected 312 customers using Vena, 42 companies that churned or ended their trial, and 13 customers with estimated renewals in the next 3 months. The most common industry is Financial Services (7%) and the most common company size is 201-500 employees (27%). Our methodology involves discovering URLs with known URL patterns through web crawling, certificate transparency logs, or modifications to subprocessor lists.
About Vena
Vena provides an AI-powered FP&A platform that integrates natively with Microsoft Excel and Office 365, enabling finance teams to streamline budgeting, forecasting, financial close, reporting, and scenario modeling within their existing spreadsheet workflows.
📊 Who in an organization decides to buy or use Vena?
Source: Analysis of 100 job postings that mention Vena
Job titles that mention Vena
i
Based on an analysis of job titles from postings that mention Vena.
Job Title
Share
Director, Finance
29%
Director, Financial Planning & Analysis
16%
Chief Financial Officer
9%
Vice President, Finance
6%
I noticed that Vena buyers are overwhelmingly finance leaders, with Directors of Finance comprising 29% of the roles, followed by FP&A Directors at 16% and CFOs at 9%. These finance executives are hiring for teams that need to support complex, multi-entity operations across industries like hospitality, healthcare, real estate, and private equity backed companies. Their strategic priorities center on scalability, as they're managing rapid growth, building financial planning infrastructure from scratch, or supporting PE-backed expansion with sophisticated reporting requirements.
The day-to-day users are FP&A managers, financial analysts, and accounting teams who rely on Vena for budgeting, forecasting, and consolidation work. One posting specifically mentions responsibility for "ownership of FP&A system (Vena), including ongoing enhancements," while another describes using "Vena and Monday.com for budgeting and project tracking." These practitioners are building models, managing the annual budget process, producing management reporting packages, and supporting executive decision making with scenario analysis.
The pain points reveal organizations struggling with manual processes and system limitations. Companies want to "establish scalable processes, tools, and infrastructure that power strategic decision-making" and need finance teams who can "optimize financial reporting and analysis" while "ensuring timely reporting of operating results." Several postings emphasize the need to "drive accuracy, accountability, and visibility through our consolidated model" and "translate complex business requirements into scalable solutions," signaling that these companies are moving away from spreadsheet chaos toward integrated planning platforms.
🔧 What other technologies do Vena customers also use?
Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 312 companies that use Vena
Commonly Paired Technologies
i
Shows how much more likely Vena customers are to use each tool compared to the general population. For example, 287x means customers are 287 times more likely to use that tool.
I noticed that Vena users operate in highly regulated, security-conscious environments where governance and employee management are critical priorities. The combination of Okta for identity management, Proofpoint for security training, and Auditboard for compliance monitoring tells me these are mature enterprises that take risk management seriously. They're likely in industries like financial services, healthcare, or manufacturing where regulatory oversight demands robust internal controls.
The pairing of Vena with Auditboard is particularly revealing. Companies using both tools are clearly focused on the intersection of financial planning and audit compliance, suggesting they need their budgets and forecasts to withstand scrutiny from auditors and regulators. Meanwhile, Cultureamp's strong presence indicates these organizations are large enough to invest in structured employee feedback and performance management, which typically happens when headcount reaches several hundred employees. Alert Media appearing so frequently suggests they're managing distributed workforces or physical locations where emergency communications matter, think retail chains, manufacturing facilities, or companies with field operations.
The full stack reveals operations-focused, governance-first organizations rather than fast-moving startups. These companies are sales-led in the sense that they likely have complex B2B sales cycles and need tight financial controls to manage revenue recognition and forecasting. They're past the scrappy startup phase and deep into the "run the business like a business" stage where finance, HR, and compliance functions all require dedicated platforms. The presence of Writer Enterprise, though in fewer companies, reinforces this is about organizational maturity and standardization.
👥 What types of companies is most likely to use Vena?
Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 312 companies that use Vena
Company Characteristics
i
Shows how much more likely Vena customers are to have each trait compared to all companies. For example, 2.0x means customers are twice as likely to have that characteristic.
Trait
Likelihood
Company Size: 1,001-5,000
14.8x
Company Size: 201-500
3.0x
Country: US
1.6x
Company Size: 51-200
1.5x
I noticed that Vena's customers span an remarkably diverse range of industries, but they share a common thread: they're operational companies with complex business models. These aren't simple software startups or single-product retailers. Instead, I'm seeing manufacturing operations like TemperPack and Wausau Coated Products, multi-location service providers like Great Clips and ONroute, financial institutions like Canada Life and Nicolet National Bank, and infrastructure-heavy businesses like Continental Properties and Sysco. What unites them is operational complexity requiring sophisticated financial planning.
These are predominantly mature, mid-to-large enterprises. The employee counts tell the story: most have 200 to 5,000+ employees, with many operating multiple locations or serving thousands of customers. Several mention decades of operation (Royal Society since 1660, Bank Iowa founded 1918, Lockton's "13,+ Associates"). The funding stages, when listed, skew toward private equity, debt financing, or post-IPO rather than venture capital Series A or B rounds. These companies have moved past survival mode into optimization mode.
Alternatives and Competitors to Vena
Explore vendors that are alternatives in this category