Companies that use Tanium

Source: Analysis of 100 job postings that mention Tanium

My analysis shows that Tanium purchasing decisions are primarily driven by security and IT leadership, with Directors of Information Security (21%) and Directors of Information Technology (14%) representing the top buyer personas. These leaders are focused on strategic priorities like vulnerability management, endpoint protection, and security compliance. They're building teams to modernize their security operations, particularly around detection capabilities and patch management across hybrid environments.

The hands-on users are SOC Analysts (7%) and Information Security Engineers (7%) who leverage Tanium daily for endpoint visibility, threat detection, and remediation workflows. I noticed these practitioners use Tanium alongside tools like Splunk, CrowdStrike, and Microsoft Defender for comprehensive security monitoring. They're conducting vulnerability assessments, managing patch deployments, performing threat hunting, and responding to security incidents in real-time across Windows, Linux, and macOS environments.

The recurring pain points center on operational efficiency and risk reduction. Organizations emphasize the need to "reduce Mean Time to Detect (MTTD) and Mean Time to Resolve (MTTR) for cybersecurity incidents" and ensure "agent health monitoring and remediation activities" across global endpoints. Multiple postings highlight requirements for "proactive vulnerability management" and "security compliance" with frameworks like PCI-DSS and ISO 27001. Companies are clearly struggling with endpoint visibility gaps and want unified platforms that can "automatically capture all contact and customer activity data" while maintaining security posture across increasingly complex, distributed infrastructures.

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 417 companies that use Tanium

I noticed that Tanium users are overwhelmingly large, security-conscious enterprises with mature compliance and risk management programs. The presence of tools like Proofpoint Security Training, Auditboard, and Navex One appearing hundreds of times more frequently tells me these companies operate in highly regulated industries where governance, risk, and compliance aren't optional. They're likely financial services firms, healthcare organizations, or large government contractors where security incidents carry massive consequences.

The pairing of Tanium with ServiceNow is particularly revealing. These companies have invested in enterprise-grade IT service management and need endpoint security that integrates into their existing workflows. When you add Auditboard to this mix, it suggests they're running continuous compliance audits where they need real-time visibility into every device on their network. Proofpoint Security Training appearing alongside Tanium makes perfect sense too. These organizations know that endpoint security technology alone isn't enough, so they're investing heavily in the human side of security awareness.

The full stack reveals these are sales-led enterprises at mature growth stages. Adobe Audience Manager and Qualtrics point to sophisticated marketing operations, but they're secondary to the core compliance and security infrastructure. These aren't nimble startups testing product-market fit. They're established companies with complex procurement processes, likely $500M in revenue or higher, where buying decisions involve security teams, compliance officers, legal departments, and IT leadership all weighing in.

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 417 companies that use Tanium

I analyzed these companies and found that Tanium's typical customer operates critical infrastructure or serves large populations where system downtime has serious consequences. These aren't just tech companies. They run hospitals and healthcare systems, operate transportation networks (toll roads, railways, airlines), manage utilities and energy, provide financial services, run government agencies, and operate large retail or hospitality operations. Many are in heavily regulated industries where security and compliance failures carry severe penalties.

These are overwhelmingly mature enterprises, not startups. The signals are clear: most have thousands or tens of thousands of employees, operate across multiple locations or countries, and describe decades of history. Many are publicly traded, government entities, or established private companies with substantial assets. I saw very few early-stage funding indicators. Instead, I found post-IPO companies, government agencies with massive budgets, and family-owned businesses operating for generations.