Companies that use Spycloud Dark Web Monitor

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 1,457 companies that use Spycloud Dark Web Monitor

I noticed that companies using SpyCloud Dark Web Monitor share a distinct profile: they're security-conscious organizations dealing with significant contract volumes and sensitive business relationships. The heavy presence of DocuSign (39.4x more likely) combined with multiple email security layers tells me these are companies managing high-value agreements where identity compromise could be catastrophic. They're likely in financial services, healthcare, or professional services where a single credential breach could expose protected data or confidential client information.

The pairing of KnowBe4 and Proofpoint is particularly revealing. These companies aren't just buying security tools randomly. They're building defense-in-depth strategies where SpyCloud monitors for already-compromised credentials while KnowBe4 trains employees to avoid future breaches and Proofpoint blocks threats at the email gateway. This suggests they've experienced or are particularly worried about credential-based attacks. The presence of Mimecast alongside Proofpoint reinforces this, showing they're doubling down on email security, which makes sense since phishing remains the primary vector for credential theft.

The full stack reveals mature, compliance-driven organizations that are likely sales-led rather than product-led. Azure DevOps indicates technical sophistication, but Miro's strong showing suggests extensive cross-functional collaboration between security, legal, and business teams. These aren't scrappy startups. They're established companies with formal procurement processes, dedicated security budgets, and probably regulatory requirements pushing them toward comprehensive identity protection.

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 1,457 companies that use Spycloud Dark Web Monitor

I noticed that SpyCloud Dark Web Monitor attracts an incredibly diverse range of organizations united by a common need to protect sensitive information. These aren't primarily tech companies. Instead, I see healthcare providers like Centre François Baclesse and Texas Heart Institute, financial services firms including insurance companies like The General and American Public Life, regional utilities like Energie Graz, law firms, government agencies like Will County Health Department, manufacturers like Capral Aluminium, and even hospitality businesses like The LINE Hotels. What they share is handling personally identifiable information at scale, whether it's patient records, financial data, employee information, or customer accounts.

Most of these companies are mature, established enterprises. I see employee counts typically ranging from 50 to 1,000-plus, with many describing "over 40 years," "since 1933," or similar longevity markers. Few show recent funding rounds. They're not startups chasing growth metrics but stable organizations managing ongoing operations. They have assets to protect, reputations to maintain, and regulatory obligations to meet.