We detected 5,350 customers using Skedda and 304 companies that churned or ended their trial. The most common industry is Software Development (6%) and the most common company size is 11-50 employees (35%). Our methodology involves discovering URLs with known URL patterns through web crawling, certificate transparency logs, or modifications to subprocessor lists.
About Skedda
Skedda provides workplace management software for hybrid offices that enables desk and meeting room booking, visitor management, and space utilization analytics through interactive floor plans, with integrations to tools like Microsoft365 and Google Workspace for seamless employee experiences.
📊 Who in an organization decides to buy or use Skedda?
Source: Analysis of 100 job postings that mention Skedda
Job titles that mention Skedda
i
Based on an analysis of job titles from postings that mention Skedda.
Job Title
Share
Receptionist
11%
Events Manager/Planner
11%
Director, Revenue
7%
Manager, Information Technology
7%
I noticed that Skedda buyers span diverse organizational roles, with no single department dominating. Receptionists (11%), events managers (11%), revenue directors (7%), IT managers (7%), and administrative assistants (7%) all appear as purchasers or influencers. The revenue operations roles suggest leadership is buying Skedda to support go-to-market efficiency and resource optimization. One posting emphasized owning "HubSpot configuration, workflows, and data quality" alongside other tools, indicating Skedda fits into broader operational tech stacks. Administrative and facilities roles appear to drive adoption in spaces where meeting room coordination is critical to daily operations.
Day-to-day users are predominantly administrative professionals managing space logistics. I found practitioners "facilitating use and rental transactions of Business Center spaces," handling "meeting room bookings and set-up," and maintaining "scheduled conference rooms as requested by office personnel using the Skedda website." Receptionists and office coordinators use it to control visitor experiences, coordinate catering, and ensure facilities run smoothly. The tool supports front-line workers who juggle multiple administrative tasks while maintaining professional environments.
The core pain point is coordination chaos across physical spaces. Companies want to "ensure smooth daily and special events operations" and provide "a welcoming and inclusive environment." One university sought someone to facilitate "use and rental transactions" efficiently, while another emphasized "maintaining scheduled time off" and resource availability. Organizations are clearly trying to eliminate booking conflicts, improve space utilization, and create seamless experiences for employees and guests through centralized scheduling systems.
🔧 What other technologies do Skedda customers also use?
Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 5,350 companies that use Skedda
Commonly Paired Technologies
i
Shows how much more likely Skedda customers are to use each tool compared to the general population. For example, 287x means customers are 287 times more likely to use that tool.
I noticed that Skedda users are typically mid-market companies managing physical spaces and resources, likely coworking spaces, educational institutions, or corporate offices with hot-desking arrangements. The presence of Robin Powered, which is 102x more likely to appear, immediately signals these are companies focused on workplace management and space optimization. This makes perfect sense since Skedda is a room and resource booking platform. These organizations need sophisticated internal operations tools rather than flashy consumer-facing technology.
The pairing with Atlassian Jira Service Desk tells me these companies run IT service desks and have complex internal support needs, which tracks for facilities managing hundreds or thousands of bookings. Retool appearing 36x more often suggests they're building custom internal dashboards and workflows, probably to connect their booking data with billing systems or usage analytics. The high correlation with Sentry means they're running web applications that require error monitoring, indicating they likely have member portals or customer-facing booking interfaces beyond just the Skedda widget itself.
The full stack reveals these are operationally sophisticated, product-led companies in growth mode. They're not enterprise sales-led organizations because we don't see heavy CRM infrastructure. Instead, they're investing in internal efficiency tools like Retool and modern security with Cloudflare Zero Trust. The Wistia correlation suggests they create educational content, probably onboarding videos for new members or customers learning to use their spaces. These companies are likely past the startup phase but not yet enterprise scale, probably between 50 and 500 employees.
👥 What types of companies is most likely to use Skedda?
Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 5,350 companies that use Skedda
Company Characteristics
i
Shows how much more likely Skedda customers are to have each trait compared to all companies. For example, 2.0x means customers are twice as likely to have that characteristic.
Trait
Likelihood
Industry: Libraries
19.2x
Industry: Religious Institutions
11.2x
Funding Stage: Private equity
11.0x
Industry: Performing Arts
10.4x
Funding Stage: Debt financing
8.7x
Funding Stage: Series A
8.3x
I noticed that Skedda's customers span an incredibly diverse range of operations, but they share a common thread: they manage physical spaces where multiple people or groups need coordinated access. These aren't just offices. I see wellness collectives with multiple practitioners, performing arts theaters, country clubs with golf courses and pools, law firms with conference rooms, construction companies managing job sites, hospitality venues, community centers, educational institutions, and healthcare facilities. What unites them is the operational challenge of scheduling shared resources, whether that's therapy rooms, meeting spaces, athletic facilities, studios, or equipment.
The company stage varies widely, but I notice a concentration in the established small-to-midsize range. Most show 11-200 employees, suggesting they've moved past startup chaos but haven't reached enterprise scale. The funding data is sparse, with most showing no recent funding rounds, which tells me these are primarily bootstrapped or profitable operations rather than venture-backed growth companies. They're mature enough to have complex scheduling needs but still nimble enough to adopt new tools.
Alternatives and Competitors to Skedda
Explore vendors that are alternatives in this category