Companies that use Prtg

Source: Analysis of 100 job postings that mention Prtg

I noticed that PRTG purchasing decisions are split between leadership and technical roles. Directors of IT, Cloud Operations, and Infrastructure represent about 17% of hiring, while Network Engineers make up 26%. These buyers prioritize network monitoring, system availability, and security compliance. Leadership roles focus on strategic transformation and elevating IT operations to best-in-class standards, while technical roles emphasize hands-on infrastructure management across hybrid cloud and on-premises environments.

The day-to-day users are predominantly network engineers, systems administrators, and NOC analysts who rely on PRTG for comprehensive infrastructure monitoring. These practitioners use it to monitor servers, network devices, storage, backups, virtualization platforms, and applications. They configure alerts, validate system health, track performance metrics, and respond to incidents. Multiple postings mention PRTG alongside tools like Zabbix, Nagios, and SolarWinds, indicating it's part of a broader monitoring ecosystem supporting 24x7 operations.

The core pain point across these organizations is maintaining uptime and visibility in complex, distributed environments. Companies repeatedly mention needs for "proactive monitoring," "ensuring high availability," and "system health validation." One posting specifically calls for "monitoring the state of systems via PRTG," while another requires "configuring alerts that permit identifying a possible failure of any component." A third emphasizes "real-time monitoring to ensure maximum uptime and performance." These phrases reveal that organizations use PRTG primarily to prevent outages and maintain service reliability across increasingly complex technical landscapes.

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 440 companies that use Prtg

I noticed that PRTG users are running mature, security-conscious IT operations with complex hybrid infrastructure. The combination of Azure DevOps, Microsoft Defender for Business, and Workspace One tells me these are companies taking enterprise IT management seriously, likely with distributed workforces and multi-cloud environments that need constant monitoring.

The pairing of PRTG with Azure DevOps makes perfect sense because these companies are managing active development pipelines while simultaneously monitoring their production infrastructure. They need visibility into both what they're building and what's currently running. Similarly, the strong correlation with Microsoft Defender for Business and Workspace One suggests these organizations are dealing with endpoint security and mobile device management at scale. PRTG fits naturally into this workflow as the network monitoring layer that catches issues these other tools might miss.

The presence of Freshservice is particularly telling. My analysis shows these companies have formalized IT service management processes, meaning they're not just monitoring infrastructure but also managing tickets, incidents, and service requests. This suggests an internal IT team supporting a substantial user base.

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 440 companies that use Prtg

I noticed that PRTG users span an incredibly diverse range of industries, but they share a common thread: they're organizations running complex, infrastructure-dependent operations. These companies manufacture physical products (furniture, transformers, pharmaceuticals, plastics), manage large-scale logistics and supply chains, operate educational institutions and healthcare facilities, provide financial services, or deliver IT and professional services. What unites them is their reliance on networks, systems, and infrastructure that absolutely must stay operational.

These are predominantly established, mature enterprises. The employee counts skew toward 50-1,000+ employees, with many in the 200-500 range. Most lack recent funding rounds, suggesting they're either profitable, privately held, or family-owned businesses rather than venture-backed startups. Several explicitly mention being "family-owned," "employee-owned," or "independent." When funding exists, it's often private equity or post-IPO, not early-stage venture capital. These organizations have complex, multi-location operations that have grown organically over time.