We detected 108 companies using LinearB and 4 companies that churned. The most common industry is Software Development (99%) and the most common company size is 201-500 employees (32%). We find new customers by discovering URLs with known URL patterns through web crawling or modifications to subprocessor lists.
Note: Our data specifically only tracks LinearB Enterprise users.
📊 Who usually uses LinearB and for what use cases?
Source: Analysis of job postings that mention LinearB (using the Bloomberry Jobs API)
Job titles that mention LinearB
i
Based on an analysis of job titles from postings that mention LinearB.
Job Title
Share
Technical Program Manager
18%
Engineering Manager
13%
Director of Engineering
10%
DevOps Engineer/SRE
8%
I noticed that LinearB buyers span both leadership and operational roles, with Technical Program Managers (18%), Engineering Managers (13%), and Directors of Engineering (10%) making up the core purchasing personas. These leaders are focused on scaling engineering delivery, establishing consistent workflows, and improving visibility into software development metrics. Their strategic priorities center on building sustainable delivery systems, tracking engineering performance, and operationalizing product development processes across growing teams.
The day-to-day users are hands-on practitioners who leverage LinearB alongside tools like Jira, Datadog, and GitHub to monitor team velocity and development workflows. DevOps engineers use it to track deployment pipelines and infrastructure changes, while program managers use it to measure sprint health and delivery predictability. Product operations teams integrate LinearB into their DevTech stacks to improve cycle times and establish data-driven feedback loops for continuous improvement.
The pain points are clear across these postings. Companies want to "drive product engineering velocity" and "deliver predictably, transparently, and with high quality." Multiple roles mention the need to "measure and improve the way they work" and establish "metric-based accountability." One posting explicitly seeks someone to "use practical approaches to support engineering effectiveness" and help teams "understand how to measure and improve" without adding unnecessary pressure. These organizations are investing in engineering operations capabilities to transform from ad-hoc execution into systematic, measurable delivery machines.
👥 What types of companies use LinearB?
Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 108 companies that use LinearB
Company Characteristics
i
Shows how much more likely LinearB customers are to have each trait compared to all companies. For example, 2.0x means customers are twice as likely to have that characteristic.
Trait
Likelihood
Funding Stage: Series C
399.8x
Funding Stage: Private equity
149.3x
Industry: Software Development
61.7x
Company Size: 1,001-5,000
19.8x
Company Size: 501-1,000
12.1x
Company Size: 201-500
9.7x
I noticed LinearB's customers are overwhelmingly B2B software companies building technical products for other businesses. These aren't consumer apps or e-commerce sites. They're creating enterprise platforms, developer tools, SaaS solutions for specific industries (healthcare IT, real estate tech, hospitality management, procurement systems), and infrastructure software. Many serve highly regulated industries or provide mission-critical systems where reliability and security matter deeply.
These are predominantly growth-stage and mature companies, not early startups. The employee counts tell the story: most have 200 to 5,000+ employees, with many in the 500 to 2,000 range. Funding stages skew toward later rounds (Series C, D, E, private equity, or post-IPO). I see established businesses with real scale: "trusted by thousands of customers," "processing billions in transactions," "serving millions of users." These companies have moved past product-market fit and are scaling operations, which means they have substantial engineering teams to manage.
🔧 What other technologies do LinearB customers also use?
Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 108 companies that use LinearB
Commonly Paired Technologies
i
Shows how much more likely LinearB customers are to use each tool compared to the general population. For example, 287x means customers are 287 times more likely to use that tool.
I noticed that LinearB users run sophisticated B2B SaaS companies with enterprise sales motions and a strong focus on customer success. The presence of tools like Gainsight, Rocketlane, and Qualified tells me these are companies selling complex products with longer sales cycles, where customer onboarding and retention are critical to the business model. They're investing heavily in both pre-sale and post-sale experiences, which suggests higher contract values and strategic customer relationships.
The pairing of Drift Premium and Qualified is particularly revealing. Both are premium conversational tools designed to qualify and route high-intent buyers in real-time. These companies are clearly running account-based marketing strategies where speed-to-lead matters enormously. Add in UserTesting, and I see organizations that are constantly validating their product experience and messaging with real users before pushing changes live. They're data-driven and won't rely on assumptions. The Rocketlane correlation reinforces this, as it's specifically built for customer onboarding. These companies know that time-to-value determines whether enterprise deals expand or churn.
My analysis shows these are sales-led organizations, likely in the growth or scale-up stage. They've found product-market fit and are now optimizing their entire revenue engine. The customer success infrastructure (Gainsight, Rocketlane) indicates they're managing meaningful ARR and focusing on net revenue retention. The premium sales tools suggest deal sizes that justify significant investment in the buying experience. These aren't early-stage startups experimenting with free trials, they're companies with repeatable enterprise sales processes.
Alternatives and Competitors to LinearB
Explore vendors that are alternatives in this category