Companies that use Gamma

Source: Analysis of job postings that mention Gamma (using the Bloomberry Jobs API)

I noticed that Gamma buyers span creative leadership (Creative Director at 15%, Director of Marketing at 12%) and partnership roles (Head of Partnerships at 8%). One posting explicitly seeks someone to build partnerships with AI SaaS companies serving SMBs, specifically mentioning Gamma alongside Notion and Cursor as platforms where SMBs rely on AI products. This suggests Gamma is purchased by go-to-market and creative leaders who see it as a presentation and content creation tool worth integrating into their tech stack. The Creative Director role at Gamma itself reveals they're targeting Fortune 100 companies while maintaining their prosumer base, with 80% of users outside the United States.

Day-to-day users appear to be marketers, designers, and sales teams who need to create presentations and visual content quickly. The Creative Director posting mentions the role will "design for product launches and brand campaigns to enterprise sales materials," indicating Gamma supports everything from marketing campaigns to sales enablement. Project managers across multiple postings coordinate deliverables that likely include presentations and stakeholder communications.

The core pain point is speed and quality in content creation. The Creative Director role emphasizes taking Gamma's brand "from beloved prosumer tool to a platform trusted by Fortune 100 companies," suggesting companies want enterprise-grade presentation tools that maintain ease of use. Another posting describes needing to "create, teach, and persuade" with millions using Gamma daily, revealing the tool solves problems around making complex information accessible and compelling across teaching, sales, and internal communication scenarios.

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 129 companies that use Gamma

I noticed that Gamma's users span an incredibly diverse range of industries, but they share something important: they're organizations that need to communicate complex ideas clearly. These aren't just tech companies. I saw pharmaceutical manufacturers like Novartis, media companies like The New York Times and Fox Corporation, consulting firms like ZS and Analysis Group, financial services providers like Checkout.com and Chatham Financial, and even transportation companies like Ocean Network Express. What unites them is that they all need to present information, whether that's to clients, stakeholders, internal teams, or the public.

These are established, well-resourced companies. The employee counts skew heavily toward mid-size to large organizations, with many having 1,000+ employees and several exceeding 10,000. Many are post-IPO, private equity backed, or have significant funding rounds behind them. Even the smaller companies in the list tend to be Series A or beyond. These aren't scrappy startups testing product-market fit. They're scaling operations, managing complex stakeholder relationships, and operating globally.

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 129 companies that use Gamma

I noticed that companies using Gamma tend to be modern, data-driven B2B organizations that prioritize operational excellence and remote collaboration. The presence of tools like Monte Carlo Data for data quality monitoring and Semgrep for code security suggests these are technically sophisticated companies, likely in the tech or SaaS space, that take their infrastructure seriously. They're building products where reliability and security matter deeply to their customers.

The pairing of Gamma with Loom Enterprise is particularly telling. Both tools solve the problem of asynchronous communication and presentation, which means these companies likely have distributed teams and value clear, scalable ways to share information. When I see Ada (customer service automation) alongside ZipHQ (employee communications), it suggests companies focused on streamlining both external and internal communications. They're thinking about efficiency at every level. Reachdesk, a gifting platform, appearing frequently indicates these companies invest in relationship-based selling despite being product-forward. They're blending high-touch and high-tech approaches.

My analysis shows these are growth-stage B2B companies, probably Series A through C, that are product-led but with increasingly sophisticated sales motions. They're not purely product-led growth, they're not old-school enterprise sales either. Instead, they're hybrid companies that use tools like Gamma to enable their teams to create compelling presentations quickly while maintaining brand consistency. The data infrastructure tools suggest they're at a stage where data governance matters, meaning they have real customers and real compliance requirements.