Companies that use Expensify

Source: Analysis of 100 job postings that mention Expensify

My analysis shows that Expensify is primarily purchased by senior finance leaders, with Directors of Finance (20%), CFOs (14%), Controllers (11%), and Directors of Accounting (9%) representing the core buyer personas. These finance executives are hiring for roles that require oversight of financial operations, month-end close processes, and accounts payable workflows. Their strategic priorities center on scalability, automation, and building efficient financial infrastructure to support rapid growth, particularly in startups and mid-market companies.

The day-to-day users span a broader range, including Executive Assistants (9%), Accounts Payable Specialists, Staff Accountants, and operations personnel who process expense reports, manage corporate credit card reconciliations, and handle vendor payments. These practitioners use Expensify to review employee expenses for policy compliance, validate receipts, reconcile transactions, and ensure timely financial recordkeeping. The tool supports critical workflows like expense coding, credit card reconciliation, and preparing data for monthly close.

The pain points I identified revolve around efficiency and control in fast-paced environments. Multiple postings mention the need to "ensure policy compliance," "resolve discrepancies," and "maintain accurate records" while supporting companies experiencing rapid scaling. Several descriptions emphasize building "scalable processes" and implementing "automation where possible to reduce manual overhead." The recurring themes of managing "high volume transactions," supporting "hyper-growth environments," and maintaining financial accuracy during expansion reveal that these organizations need Expensify to bring structure and visibility to expense management without adding bureaucratic layers.

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 3,275 companies that use Expensify

I noticed that Expensify users consistently adopt tools that enable distributed, remote-first operations combined with sophisticated internal workflows. The presence of Zoom Business alongside collaboration tools like Lucidchart and Golinks tells me these are companies that have embraced remote work as a permanent operating model, not just a temporary adjustment. They need expense management because they have employees working from multiple locations, traveling, and incurring distributed costs that require systematic tracking.

The pairing of Okta with Expensify is particularly revealing. Companies implementing enterprise identity management are thinking seriously about security and access control across their entire stack. When I see DocuSign appearing 78 times more often, it confirms these organizations are digitizing financial workflows end to to end. They're automating approval chains, contracts, and reimbursements rather than relying on paper processes. The appearance of Cursor, a developer tool, is interesting because it suggests these companies have meaningful engineering teams who also need expense tracking for tools, services, and infrastructure costs.

The full stack reveals companies in a growth stage where they've moved beyond startup chaos but haven't ossified into enterprise bureaucracy. They're building scalable operations, which is why they need both the automation (DocuSign, Expensify) and the coordination tools (Lucidchart for process mapping, Golinks for internal knowledge management). These appear to be product-led or sales-led B2B companies with 50 to 500 employees who are geographically distributed and moving fast enough that manual expense tracking would create bottlenecks.

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 3,275 companies that use Expensify

I noticed that Expensify's customers span an impressive range of industries, but they share a common thread: these are knowledge workers and specialized service providers building complex, high-value offerings. I see biotechnology companies developing cancer therapeutics, software firms creating AI-powered platforms, defense contractors building autonomous systems, and professional services firms delivering sophisticated financial solutions. What unites them isn't their sector but their sophistication. These companies aren't selling commodities. They're creating proprietary technology, conducting clinical trials, managing intricate client relationships, and operating across multiple geographies.

Looking at their maturity, I see a strong tilt toward growth-stage and established companies rather than early startups. Most have 50-500 employees, with many in the Series B to post-IPO range. They've moved beyond survival mode into scaling operations, expanding geographies, and managing complex teams. The funding amounts are substantial when disclosed, often in the tens or hundreds of millions. These aren't garage operations experimenting with product-market fit. They're professional organizations with established processes, compliance requirements, and distributed teams that travel.