Companies that use Bugsnag

Analyzed and validated by Henley Wing Chiu
All โ€บ error tracking and application debugging โ€บ Bugsnag

Bugsnag We detected 9,073 companies using Bugsnag. The most common industry is Retail (70%) and the most common company size is 2-10 employees (77%). We find new customers by detecting JavaScript snippets or configurations on customer websites.

โฑ๏ธ Data is delayed by 1 month. To show real-time data, sign up for a free trial or login
Company Employees Industry Region YoY Headcount Growth Usage Start Date
olovshop 2โ€“10 Retail US N/A 2026-02-12
Hello Birdie Nail & Lash Lab 2โ€“10 Retail US N/A 2026-02-12
Red Bull Ampol Racing Official Team Store 2โ€“10 Retail AU N/A 2026-02-12
Domani Home 11โ€“50 Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing US N/A 2026-02-12
Ducky Zebra 1 employee Retail Apparel and Fashion GB 0% 2026-02-12
Gloomie Chรฉrie 2โ€“10 Personal Care Product Manufacturing CA N/A 2026-02-12
personsoul 2โ€“10 Retail HK N/A 2026-02-12
AYA Sacred Wear 2โ€“10 Retail Apparel and Fashion ID N/A 2026-02-12
Joyeria Imperio 11โ€“50 Retail Luxury Goods and Jewelry BO N/A 2026-02-12
Queendom Aesthetics 11โ€“50 Wellness and Fitness Services US N/A 2026-02-12
urbanAthletics 2โ€“10 Retail PH N/A 2026-02-11
Housekeepers Design 2โ€“10 Retail NZ N/A 2026-02-11
Edisons - Online Machinery & Hardware Specialist 51โ€“200 Machinery Manufacturing AU N/A 2026-02-11
Wholesale Italian Food 2โ€“10 Retail US N/A 2026-02-11
Trckem 2โ€“10 Chemical Manufacturing IN N/A 2026-02-11
Bumble Shop 2โ€“10 Retail US N/A 2026-02-11
VENTETE 2โ€“10 Manufacturing GB +14.3% 2026-02-11
Manners London 2โ€“10 Retail GB N/A 2026-02-11
ClearClub 2โ€“10 Wellness and Fitness Services US 0% 2026-02-11
bounti UK 2โ€“10 Retail GB N/A 2026-02-11
Showing 1-20 of 9,073

Market Insights

๐Ÿข Top Industries

Retail 5668 (70%)
Retail Apparel and Fashion 323 (4%)
Manufacturing 142 (2%)
Food and Beverage Services 139 (2%)
Wellness and Fitness Services 122 (2%)

๐Ÿ“ Company Size Distribution

2-10 employees 6852 (77%)
11-50 employees 1019 (12%)
51-200 employees 563 (6%)
201-500 employees 198 (2%)
1 employee employees 80 (1%)

๐Ÿ“Š Who usually uses Bugsnag and for what use cases?

Source: Analysis of job postings that mention Bugsnag (using the Bloomberry Jobs API)

Job titles that mention Bugsnag
i
Job Title
Share
Software Engineer
35%
Senior Software Engineer
28%
DevOps Engineer
12%
Mobile Engineer
10%
QA Engineer
8%
I noticed that 96% of the roles mentioning Bugsnag are individual contributor positions, with Software Engineers and Senior Software Engineers representing 63% of all postings. The buyers appear to be engineering leadership, specifically Engineering Managers, Directors of Engineering, and CTOs who are building or scaling product development teams. These leaders are focused on operational excellence, with repeated emphasis on observability, monitoring, and production stability across web and mobile applications.

The day-to-day users are predominantly backend, mobile, and fullstack engineers who integrate Bugsnag into their deployment pipelines and monitoring workflows. These practitioners use it alongside tools like Sentry, Datadog, New Relic, and Firebase for error tracking and crash reporting. Mobile engineers especially rely on it for iOS and Android crash monitoring, while backend teams use it to maintain system reliability in production environments running on AWS, Kubernetes, and various microservices architectures.

The pain points center on scaling while maintaining quality and velocity. Companies repeatedly mention needing to "ensure the quality of delivered functionality," "monitor and guarantee the health and performance of the product," and "troubleshoot and debug issues within existing codebases." Several postings explicitly call for experience with "observability in aplicativos cloud" and "comprehensive monitoring and logging" to support rapid growth. The emphasis on CI/CD automation, performance optimization, and real-time error detection reveals organizations striving to ship faster without sacrificing stability.

๐Ÿ‘ฅ What types of companies use Bugsnag?

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 9,073 companies that use Bugsnag

Company Characteristics
i
Trait
Likelihood
Funding Stage: Equity crowdfunding
17.7x
Industry: Retail Health and Personal Care Products
12.0x
Industry: Apparel & Fashion
11.6x
Industry: Retail Apparel and Fashion
9.1x
Funding Stage: Non equity assistance
6.1x
Funding Stage: Series unknown
3.8x
I noticed that Bugsnag's typical customers are predominantly e-commerce and direct-to-consumer brands selling physical products. The majority are online retailers operating Shopify stores or similar platforms, spanning everything from apparel and jewelry to skincare, pet products, food items, and home goods. There's a strong concentration of lifestyle brands, beauty products, and fashion companies. Beyond retail, I see a smaller segment of SaaS companies, hospitality businesses, and service providers, but the core customer base is clearly product-focused businesses that need reliable online storefronts.

These are primarily small to mid-sized businesses in growth mode. The employee counts cluster heavily in the 2-10 and 11-50 ranges, with very few exceeding 200 employees. Most show no funding stage or are bootstrapped, suggesting they're founder-led businesses focused on profitability over venture scaling. The few that have raised capital are typically at seed or Series A stage. The exception is software companies like Gorgias and Workvivo, which are more mature with substantial funding.

๐Ÿ”ง What other technologies do Bugsnag customers also use?

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 9,073 companies that use Bugsnag

Commonly Paired Technologies
i
Technology
Likelihood
884.4x
42.3x
33.6x
23.9x
11.1x
6.6x
I noticed that Bugsnag users have an unmistakable profile: they're e-commerce companies, and specifically ones built on Shopify. The presence of Shopify at nearly 24 times the normal rate, combined with Judge.me for product reviews and Klaviyo for email marketing, tells me these are online retailers focused on direct-to-consumer sales. This isn't enterprise software or SaaS companies. These are businesses selling physical products online.

The pairing of Bugsnag with Shopify makes perfect sense because e-commerce sites can't afford downtime or checkout errors. Every bug directly costs revenue. When I see Klaviyo appearing 33 times more often, that reinforces the e-commerce angle since Klaviyo specializes in email flows for abandoned carts and post-purchase sequences. Judge.me's strong correlation adds another layer because product reviews are critical for conversion rates in online retail. These companies are monitoring their entire customer journey, from browsing to checkout to post-purchase engagement, and they need to catch errors at every step.

The full stack reveals marketing-led growth companies that depend heavily on paid acquisition. Facebook Ads appearing 11 times more frequently shows they're buying traffic and need to optimize conversion rates aggressively. Google Search Console suggests they're also investing in organic search. These aren't early-stage startups experimenting with product-market fit. They're growth-stage retailers with real revenue who can justify spending on error monitoring because they understand that technical issues directly impact their bottom line. They've moved past basic operations and are optimizing for scale.

Alternatives and Competitors to Bugsnag

Explore vendors that are alternatives in this category

Rollbar Rollbar Sentry Sentry Bugsnag Bugsnag New Relic Browser Monitoring New Relic Browser Monitoring Datadog Datadog

Loading data...