Companies that use Bugsnag

Analyzed and validated by Henley Wing Chiu
All โ€บ error tracking and application debugging โ€บ Bugsnag

Bugsnag We detected 8,867 customers using Bugsnag. The most common industry is Retail (70%) and the most common company size is 2-10 employees (78%). Our methodology involves detecting JavaScript snippets or configurations on customer websites.

Note: We are unable to detect churned customers for this vendor, only new customers

About Bugsnag

Bugsnag provides automated error and performance monitoring for applications, detecting crashes, exceptions, and slowdowns in real-time while prioritizing issues by severity and user impact. The platform helps developers quickly identify and resolve bugs across mobile, web, and backend systems to improve application stability and user experience.

โฑ๏ธ Data is delayed by 1 month. To show real-time data, sign up for a free trial or login
Company Employees Industry Region YoY Headcount Growth Usage Start Date
The Process Fixer 2โ€“10 Operations Consulting US -60% 2025-12-30
PRESSIE - Faux ongles 3D stylรฉs 2โ€“10 Retail US N/A 2025-12-30
YankeeDabbler 2โ€“10 Retail US N/A 2025-12-30
CRYSTAL NINJA, LLC 2โ€“10 Arts & Crafts US 0% 2025-12-29
Capital GMC Buick 51โ€“200 Retail N/A N/A 2025-12-29
BYML 2โ€“10 Retail SE N/A 2025-12-29
Banana Moon Clothing 11โ€“50 Printing Services GB -6.5% 2025-12-29
GRAND MESS Clermont-Ferrand 51โ€“200 Hospitality FR N/A 2025-12-28
Restaurant KITA 51โ€“200 Restaurants NL N/A 2025-12-28
MagStor 2โ€“10 Retail US N/A 2025-12-28
Shop Good 11โ€“50 Retail Health and Personal Care Products US +58.8% 2025-12-28
L'Aquarium 11โ€“50 Hospitality FR -11.8% 2025-12-27
Crystal Bar Soap 2โ€“10 Personal Care Product Manufacturing US 0% 2025-12-27
Stitchin' Heaven 51โ€“200 Retail US N/A 2025-12-27
Kapow Group 2โ€“10 Retail Apparel and Fashion US 0% 2025-12-27
Gene.In.Us Brain 2โ€“10 Retail US N/A 2025-12-27
Natural Clothing Company 2โ€“10 Retail US N/A 2025-12-27
Hoop Group 11โ€“50 Spectator Sports US 0% 2025-12-27
Socially Inclined 2โ€“10 Advertising Services US +25% 2025-12-26
Lamar Trailers Inc. 201โ€“500 Manufacturing US N/A 2025-12-26
Showing 1-20 of 8,867

Market Insights

๐Ÿข Top Industries

Retail 5584 (70%)
Retail Apparel and Fashion 303 (4%)
Food and Beverage Services 135 (2%)
Manufacturing 131 (2%)
Wellness and Fitness Services 111 (1%)

๐Ÿ“ Company Size Distribution

2-10 employees 6720 (78%)
11-50 employees 978 (11%)
51-200 employees 537 (6%)
201-500 employees 184 (2%)
1 employee employees 78 (1%)

๐Ÿ“Š Who in an organization decides to buy or use Bugsnag?

Source: Analysis of 100 job postings that mention Bugsnag

Job titles that mention Bugsnag
i
Job Title
Share
Software Engineer
35%
Senior Software Engineer
28%
DevOps Engineer
12%
Mobile Engineer
10%
QA Engineer
8%
I noticed that 96% of the roles mentioning Bugsnag are individual contributor positions, with Software Engineers and Senior Software Engineers representing 63% of all postings. The buyers appear to be engineering leadership, specifically Engineering Managers, Directors of Engineering, and CTOs who are building or scaling product development teams. These leaders are focused on operational excellence, with repeated emphasis on observability, monitoring, and production stability across web and mobile applications.

The day-to-day users are predominantly backend, mobile, and fullstack engineers who integrate Bugsnag into their deployment pipelines and monitoring workflows. These practitioners use it alongside tools like Sentry, Datadog, New Relic, and Firebase for error tracking and crash reporting. Mobile engineers especially rely on it for iOS and Android crash monitoring, while backend teams use it to maintain system reliability in production environments running on AWS, Kubernetes, and various microservices architectures.

The pain points center on scaling while maintaining quality and velocity. Companies repeatedly mention needing to "ensure the quality of delivered functionality," "monitor and guarantee the health and performance of the product," and "troubleshoot and debug issues within existing codebases." Several postings explicitly call for experience with "observability in aplicativos cloud" and "comprehensive monitoring and logging" to support rapid growth. The emphasis on CI/CD automation, performance optimization, and real-time error detection reveals organizations striving to ship faster without sacrificing stability.

๐Ÿ”ง What other technologies do Bugsnag customers also use?

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 8,867 companies that use Bugsnag

Commonly Paired Technologies
i
Technology
Likelihood
884.4x
42.3x
33.6x
23.9x
11.1x
6.6x
I noticed that Bugsnag users have an unmistakable profile: they're e-commerce companies, and specifically ones built on Shopify. The presence of Shopify at nearly 24 times the normal rate, combined with Judge.me for product reviews and Klaviyo for email marketing, tells me these are online retailers focused on direct-to-consumer sales. This isn't enterprise software or SaaS companies. These are businesses selling physical products online.

The pairing of Bugsnag with Shopify makes perfect sense because e-commerce sites can't afford downtime or checkout errors. Every bug directly costs revenue. When I see Klaviyo appearing 33 times more often, that reinforces the e-commerce angle since Klaviyo specializes in email flows for abandoned carts and post-purchase sequences. Judge.me's strong correlation adds another layer because product reviews are critical for conversion rates in online retail. These companies are monitoring their entire customer journey, from browsing to checkout to post-purchase engagement, and they need to catch errors at every step.

The full stack reveals marketing-led growth companies that depend heavily on paid acquisition. Facebook Ads appearing 11 times more frequently shows they're buying traffic and need to optimize conversion rates aggressively. Google Search Console suggests they're also investing in organic search. These aren't early-stage startups experimenting with product-market fit. They're growth-stage retailers with real revenue who can justify spending on error monitoring because they understand that technical issues directly impact their bottom line. They've moved past basic operations and are optimizing for scale.

๐Ÿ‘ฅ What types of companies is most likely to use Bugsnag?

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 8,867 companies that use Bugsnag

Company Characteristics
i
Trait
Likelihood
Funding Stage: Equity crowdfunding
17.7x
Industry: Retail Health and Personal Care Products
12.0x
Industry: Apparel & Fashion
11.6x
Industry: Retail Apparel and Fashion
9.1x
Funding Stage: Non equity assistance
6.1x
Funding Stage: Series unknown
3.8x
I noticed that Bugsnag's typical customers are predominantly e-commerce and direct-to-consumer brands selling physical products. The majority are online retailers operating Shopify stores or similar platforms, spanning everything from apparel and jewelry to skincare, pet products, food items, and home goods. There's a strong concentration of lifestyle brands, beauty products, and fashion companies. Beyond retail, I see a smaller segment of SaaS companies, hospitality businesses, and service providers, but the core customer base is clearly product-focused businesses that need reliable online storefronts.

These are primarily small to mid-sized businesses in growth mode. The employee counts cluster heavily in the 2-10 and 11-50 ranges, with very few exceeding 200 employees. Most show no funding stage or are bootstrapped, suggesting they're founder-led businesses focused on profitability over venture scaling. The few that have raised capital are typically at seed or Series A stage. The exception is software companies like Gorgias and Workvivo, which are more mature with substantial funding.

Alternatives and Competitors to Bugsnag

Explore vendors that are alternatives in this category

Rollbar Rollbar Sentry Sentry Dynatrace Real User Monitoring Dynatrace Real User Monitoring Datadog Datadog

Loading data...