Companies that use ZipHQ

Source: Analysis of 100 job postings that mention ZipHQ

I noticed that ZipHQ purchasing decisions sit primarily with finance and procurement leadership. The VP of Finance, Director of Finance Systems, and CFO roles appear throughout these postings, indicating that finance executives are the key buyers. Their strategic priorities center on scaling procure-to-pay operations, implementing SOX compliance controls, and driving automation across the source-to-contract lifecycle. These leaders are building teams specifically around ZipHQ expertise, which tells me they view it as core infrastructure rather than just another tool.

The day-to-day users are predominantly procurement specialists, accounts payable teams, and financial systems administrators. These practitioners use ZipHQ for invoice processing, purchase order management, vendor onboarding, contract lifecycle management, and three-way matching between purchase orders, receipts, and invoices. I see heavy emphasis on integration work, connecting ZipHQ with NetSuite, Workday, Coupa, and other finance systems to create seamless procure-to-pay workflows.

The pain points revolve around scale and control. Companies want to "drive financial results through better supplier negotiations," "ensure compliance with SOX 404 controls," and achieve "operational excellence, compliance, and alignment with company objectives." Multiple postings mention the need to "streamline operations" and "drive automation" while managing rapid growth. One role specifically calls out responsibility for "accurate invoice classification and obtaining proper business owner approvals" before syncing to the general ledger, highlighting the governance and visibility challenges ZipHQ helps solve.

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 409 companies that use ZipHQ

I noticed that ZipHQ customers are building sophisticated sales organizations that prioritize enablement, knowledge management, and operational efficiency. The presence of tools like Mindtickle, Highspot, and Glean tells me these are companies investing heavily in their go-to-market teams, likely B2B businesses with complex sales cycles that need their reps to be well-trained and have instant access to information.

The pairing of Mindtickle with Highspot is particularly revealing. Mindtickle handles sales readiness and ongoing training, while Highspot manages sales content and buyer engagement. Together, they suggest a company that's continuously upskilling their revenue teams while ensuring they have the right materials at every deal stage. Adding Glean into this mix makes even more sense because as these organizations scale, institutional knowledge gets scattered. Glean helps sales reps quickly find answers across all their tools without interrupting subject matter experts. The high correlation with Decagon AI suggests these companies are also thinking about customer support scalability, likely because they're growing fast and need AI to handle routine inquiries.

My analysis shows these are sales-led growth companies, probably Series B through pre-IPO stage. The investment in Cultureamp signals they're large enough to care deeply about employee engagement and retention, which becomes critical when you're scaling past 200 employees. They're not early startups experimenting with product-led growth. They're maturing companies building repeatable sales engines that require consistent training, easy knowledge access, and efficient internal processes (hence Golinks for simplified link sharing).

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 409 companies that use ZipHQ

I noticed that ZipHQ's customers span an incredibly diverse range of industries, but they share a common thread: they're building or operating complex, technology-enabled platforms and services. These aren't traditional businesses. They're companies powering global payment networks (Checkout.com, Flywire), managing sensitive healthcare data (Bamboo Health, Carbon Health), running massive digital marketplaces (Vivid Seats, ACV Auctions), or developing cutting-edge financial products (Greenlight, Acorns). What unites them is operational complexity and the need to move fast while managing significant scale.

These companies sit firmly in the growth and scale-up phase. The funding data tells the story: Series C through Series F rounds dominate, with many having raised $100M+. I see lots of employee counts between 500 and 5,000, that sweet spot where companies have proven their model but still need to build out operations rapidly. Several are post-IPO but still growing aggressively. These aren't scrappy 10-person startups or slow-moving legacy enterprises.