Companies that use Vanta

Source: Analysis of 100 job postings that mention Vanta

I noticed that Vanta buyers are predominantly security and compliance leaders at the director level or above, with 23% being Directors of Information Security, 15% Directors of Security GRC, and 12% Directors of Compliance. These roles sit at the intersection of technology, risk management, and regulatory requirements. Their strategic priorities focus on scaling compliance programs, managing multiple frameworks simultaneously like SOC 2, HIPAA, ISO 27001, and HITRUST, and enabling business growth without security becoming a bottleneck. They're building programs that need to support rapid company expansion while maintaining audit readiness.

The day-to-day users include GRC analysts, compliance managers, and IT security teams who leverage Vanta for continuous compliance monitoring, evidence collection, and audit preparation. These practitioners use the platform to automate control testing, manage vendor risk assessments, respond to customer security questionnaires, and track remediation activities. The tool serves as their central hub for maintaining certifications and demonstrating security posture to customers and auditors.

The pain points I identified center on scaling challenges and operational efficiency. Companies want to move from manual, reactive compliance work to automated, continuous programs. One posting seeks someone to "build out a cohesive framework for risk management, compliance, and certifications" while another emphasizes "leveraging compliance automation" and creating "audit-ready documentation." A third describes needing to "transform how organizations achieve cybersecurity and compliance" with "tech-enabled" approaches. These organizations view Vanta as essential infrastructure for earning customer trust while supporting aggressive growth trajectories.

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 3,811 companies that use Vanta

I noticed that companies using Vanta overwhelmingly adopt modern, developer-friendly SaaS tools that prioritize transparency and operational excellence. The presence of multiple status page solutions and incident management tools alongside modern project management and hiring platforms tells me these are growth-stage B2B companies, likely selling to other businesses that care deeply about security and reliability. They're building trust as a competitive advantage.

The pairing of Vanta with Ashby and Linear is particularly revealing. Ashby represents sophisticated, metrics-driven hiring at scale, while Linear signals engineering teams that value speed and focus. Together with Vanta, this suggests companies racing to grow their technical teams while maintaining compliance standards that enterprise customers demand. These aren't startups throwing tools together randomly. They're scaling deliberately with an eye toward enterprise readiness.

The correlation with both Atlassian StatusPage and Incident.io is fascinating because it shows these companies are proactive about communicating reliability to customers. When you combine transparency tools with Vanta's compliance automation, you see a clear strategy: demonstrating trustworthiness through both security certifications and operational openness. The high correlation with HubSpot Marketing Hub adds another layer, showing these companies are running sophisticated demand generation while their product and engineering teams focus on building reliable, secure products.

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 3,811 companies that use Vanta

I noticed that Vanta's customers span an incredibly diverse range of industries, but they share a common thread: they're almost all technology-enabled businesses handling sensitive data. These aren't traditional brick-and-mortar companies. They're building SaaS platforms, AI agents, fintech infrastructure, healthcare software, and developer tools. Many are in regulated industries like financial services, healthcare, legal tech, and government contracting where compliance isn't optional. Even the companies that seem industry-specific, like Carrum Health or Securly, are fundamentally software companies solving problems through digital platforms.

These are predominantly growth-stage companies. I see a heavy concentration of Series A and Series B funding rounds, with employee counts typically between 11-200 people. There are some earlier pre-seed and seed companies, plus a handful of larger enterprises, but the sweet spot seems to be companies that have achieved product-market fit and are now scaling. They've moved past the scrappy startup phase where compliance might be deprioritized, but they're not yet massive corporations with dedicated security teams.