We detected 116 customers using SnackPass, 13 companies that churned or ended their trial, and 3 customers with estimated renewals in the next 3 months. The most common industry is Restaurants (40%) and the most common company size is 2-10 employees (95%). Our methodology involves detecting JavaScript snippets or configurations on customer websites.
Note: Our data specifically only tracks SnackPass Online Ordering users.
About SnackPass
SnackPass enables customers to place pickup and delivery orders from quick-serve restaurants through a website or mobile app, allowing them to schedule orders in advance and earn loyalty points.
🔧 What other technologies do SnackPass customers also use?
Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 116 companies that use SnackPass
Commonly Paired Technologies
i
Shows how much more likely SnackPass customers are to use each tool compared to the general population. For example, 287x means customers are 287 times more likely to use that tool.
I noticed that SnackPass users are predominantly food service businesses, specifically restaurants and quick-service establishments that are actively managing multiple digital ordering channels. The dramatic correlation with both DoorDash Storefront and Clover Online Ordering tells me these are brick-and-mortar food businesses trying to capture online orders through several different platforms simultaneously rather than relying on just one channel.
The pairing with DoorDash Storefront makes immediate sense because SnackPass itself is an ordering platform focused on restaurants, so these businesses are clearly comfortable using multiple ordering systems in parallel. They're not exclusively loyal to one provider. Instead, they're casting a wide net across different customer acquisition channels. The Clover connection reinforces this, since Clover provides point-of-sale systems with integrated online ordering. These companies are building redundant ordering infrastructure, likely because they've learned that customers have strong preferences about which app or website they use to place orders.
The full stack reveals these are operationally sophisticated restaurants that treat digital ordering as mission-critical infrastructure, not an experiment. They're managing complexity that would overwhelm a less mature operation. These aren't traditional sales-led companies in the B2B sense. They're operations-focused businesses making pragmatic decisions about reaching customers wherever those customers already are. They're probably past the early startup phase and into scaling mode, since they have the operational bandwidth to manage three or more ordering platforms simultaneously.
👥 What types of companies is most likely to use SnackPass?
Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 116 companies that use SnackPass
I analyzed these nine SnackPass users and found they're overwhelmingly small food service businesses operating physical locations where customers order and pick up meals. Seven of the nine are restaurants or food vendors serving everything from Korean cuisine to poke bowls to Portuguese flame-grilled chicken. Even the outlier, Euphnet Cyber Cafe, likely serves snacks alongside gaming. These aren't sophisticated tech companies or large chains. They're local eateries focused on quick service.
These companies are clearly not high-growth startups. Most have between 2 and 50 employees, with no funding history listed. Only two exceptions stand out: Pokemoto at 90 employees appears to be an established franchise system, and 1951 Coffee received a modest $150K grant as a nonprofit. The absence of venture funding, combined with small team sizes and localized operations, signals these are independent small businesses or early-stage local chains focused on survival and steady growth rather than rapid scaling.
Alternatives and Competitors to SnackPass
Explore vendors that are alternatives in this category