Companies that use Manageengine Service Desk Plus

Source: Analysis of 100 job postings that mention Manageengine Service Desk Plus

My analysis shows that ManageEngine Service Desk Plus is purchased primarily by IT leadership, specifically IT Service Desk Managers (13%) and IT Service Delivery Managers. These buyers are focused on establishing ITIL-aligned service delivery, improving operational efficiency, and managing service level agreements. The strategic priorities I noticed include building robust knowledge management systems, ensuring audit readiness and compliance, and scaling IT operations to support growing employee bases across multiple locations.

The day-to-day users are predominantly IT Support Specialists (29%), System Administrators (13%), and Network Administrators (8%) who use the platform for ticketing, incident management, and service request fulfillment. These practitioners are handling hardware and software support, managing Active Directory and Office 365 environments, and providing multi-tier technical support. They rely on the tool for workflow automation, SLA tracking, and knowledge base creation to streamline their support operations.

The pain points reveal companies seeking to professionalize their IT operations and improve customer satisfaction. I noticed repeated emphasis on needing to ensure timely resolution of incidents and service requests, track all incidents to completion, and own tickets from entry point to resolution. Organizations are also focused on driving continuous service improvement and establishing a central point of contact for employees. Many descriptions specifically mention the need to align with ITIL practices and maintain comprehensive documentation for troubleshooting recurring issues.

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 13,142 companies that use Manageengine Service Desk Plus

I noticed that ManageEngine Service Desk Plus users are overwhelmingly enterprise IT operations teams focused on internal infrastructure management rather than customer-facing services. The presence of tools like UiPath for automation, SolarWinds for network monitoring, and Microsoft Defender shows these are companies investing heavily in their internal IT capabilities. They're not building consumer apps or running marketing campaigns. They're managing complex corporate IT environments.

The pairing with UiPath is particularly telling. These companies are automating repetitive IT tasks and workflows, suggesting they handle high volumes of internal support tickets and want to reduce manual work. The strong correlation with Azure DevOps and Jira Service Desk reveals a hybrid approach where they're managing both traditional IT service requests and modern software development workflows under one roof. Meanwhile, Webex appearing so frequently suggests these are organizations with distributed teams that need robust remote collaboration, likely accelerated by pandemic-era work changes.

My analysis shows these are mature, operations-led enterprises rather than growth-stage startups. They're not product-led companies focused on user acquisition or sales-led organizations optimizing revenue pipelines. Instead, they're established businesses where keeping internal systems running smoothly is mission-critical. The emphasis on security (Microsoft Defender), automation (UiPath), and service management coordination (multiple ticketing systems) indicates companies with substantial IT teams supporting large employee bases. These organizations likely have 500 plus employees with dedicated IT operations staff.

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 13,142 companies that use Manageengine Service Desk Plus

I noticed that ManageEngine Service Desk Plus attracts an incredibly diverse cross-section of organizations that often manage complex operations requiring coordination across multiple locations or departments. These aren't just tech companies. I'm seeing automotive dealerships, food distributors, hospitals, banks, agricultural cooperatives, government agencies, schools, construction firms, retirement homes, and even auction houses. What unites them is operational complexity: they're managing physical locations, coordinating distributed teams, handling equipment and assets, or serving customers across multiple touchpoints.

These are predominantly established, mature organizations rather than startups. The employee counts cluster heavily in the 50-500 range, with many operating for decades. I saw multiple companies celebrating 30, 40, or even + years in business. Very few showed venture funding, and those that did were typically Series B or later. The presence of multiple locations, large employee bases, and references to "proven track record" or "industry leader" status suggests these are stable enterprises managing steady operations rather than hypergrowth ventures.