We detected 2,538 customers using Loop Returns, 489 companies that churned or ended their trial, and 115 customers with estimated renewals in the next 3 months. The most common industry is Retail (46%) and the most common company size is 2-10 employees (54%). Our methodology involves discovering URLs with known URL patterns through web crawling, certificate transparency logs, or modifications to subprocessor lists.
About Loop Returns
Loop Returns provides returns management software for ecommerce brands to automate returns and exchanges, retain revenue through optimized post-purchase experiences, and prevent fraud while tracking orders and maintaining customer loyalty.
๐ Who in an organization decides to buy or use Loop Returns?
Source: Analysis of 100 job postings that mention Loop Returns
Job titles that mention Loop Returns
i
Based on an analysis of job titles from postings that mention Loop Returns.
Job Title
Share
Customer Service Representative
20%
Manager, Customer Service/Front Office
17%
Ecommerce Specialist
13%
Director, Customer Service
3%
My analysis shows that Loop Returns is primarily purchased by customer experience and operations leaders. The buyers include Heads of Customer Service, Senior Directors of Marketing, and Directors of Customer Service who are building or scaling their post-purchase infrastructure. These leaders are hiring for retention-focused roles and seeking to transform returns from a cost center into a driver of repeat business and customer loyalty.
The day-to-day users of Loop Returns are overwhelmingly customer service representatives, ecommerce coordinators, and customer experience specialists. These practitioners handle returns and exchanges directly within platforms like Gorgias and Shopify, processing customer requests, managing the Loop Returns interface, troubleshooting order issues, and coordinating with warehouses. The tool appears deeply integrated into their daily ticketing workflows and is often mentioned alongside other essential tech stack components like Klaviyo and ShipStation.
I noticed several recurring pain points across these postings. Companies want to "optimize the post-purchase experience" and build "scalable systems" as they grow. They emphasize "streamlining processes" between customer service teams and distribution centers. One company specifically seeks someone to "improve overall performance and reduce costs" related to returns operations. Another highlights the importance of the "end-to-end order journey" and seamless platform integration. These phrases reveal that Loop Returns buyers are focused on operational efficiency, cost reduction, and creating friction-free customer experiences that drive retention.
๐ง What other technologies do Loop Returns customers also use?
Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 2,538 companies that use Loop Returns
Commonly Paired Technologies
i
Shows how much more likely Loop Returns customers are to use each tool compared to the general population. For example, 287x means customers are 287 times more likely to use that tool.
I noticed that Loop Returns customers are clearly direct-to-consumer e-commerce brands running on Shopify with sophisticated retention and customer experience strategies. The prevalence of Gorgias, Klaviyo, and Attentive tells me these companies prioritize customer communication across multiple channels and view post-purchase experience as critical to their business model. They're not just moving products but building ongoing relationships with customers.
The pairing of Loop Returns with Gorgias makes perfect sense because returns are one of the highest-friction moments in the customer journey. These companies want their support teams handling returns inquiries seamlessly within the same platform where they manage all customer service. Meanwhile, Klaviyo and Attentive appearing together suggests these brands use email and SMS strategically throughout the customer lifecycle, likely including post-return win-back campaigns. The presence of Rebuy Engine is particularly interesting because it shows these companies are thinking about exchanges and upsells even during the returns process, turning a potential loss into a revenue opportunity.
The full stack reveals these are marketing-led, digitally native brands that are past the startup phase. They've reached a scale where return volume matters enough to need dedicated software, and they have the budget for premium tools like Triple Whale for analytics and Elevar for accurate tracking. These aren't enterprise retailers with legacy systems or small boutiques with minimal returns. They're growth-stage DTC brands processing enough transactions that operational efficiency and customer lifetime value optimization directly impact their bottom line.
๐ฅ What types of companies is most likely to use Loop Returns?
Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 2,538 companies that use Loop Returns
Company Characteristics
i
Shows how much more likely Loop Returns customers are to have each trait compared to all companies. For example, 2.0x means customers are twice as likely to have that characteristic.
Trait
Likelihood
Industry: Retail Apparel and Fashion
34.9x
Industry: Apparel & Fashion
29.9x
Industry: Retail Luxury Goods and Jewelry
14.6x
Funding Stage: Series unknown
8.0x
Country: US
1.9x
Country: AU
1.6x
I noticed that Loop Returns primarily serves direct-to-consumer brands selling physical products, with a heavy concentration in apparel and fashion. These companies manufacture and sell everything from everyday clothing and activewear to specialized items like equestrian gear, swimwear, and lingerie. Beyond fashion, I saw beauty and cosmetics brands, pet food companies, home goods retailers, sporting equipment manufacturers, and even niche products like cloth diapers and phone accessories. What unites them is that they all need to handle product returns as a core part of their e-commerce operations.
These companies span a wide range, but most appear to be in growth mode rather than early startup or fully mature enterprise stages. The employee counts typically range from 10 to 200 people, with many in the 11-50 range. Few mention significant funding rounds, and when they do, it tends to be modest amounts. Many are founder-led brands that have moved beyond initial launch but are actively scaling, evident in phrases about expanding retail presence, growing internationally, or building teams.
Alternatives and Competitors to Loop Returns
Explore vendors that are alternatives in this category