Companies that use Loom

Source: Analysis of 100 job postings that mention Loom

I noticed that Loom buyers span revenue operations, marketing, sales leadership, and finance roles. Directors of Revenue Operations (10%) and Finance (10%) appear frequently, alongside marketing directors (7%) and heads of sales (7%). These leaders are prioritizing efficiency, cross-functional alignment, and team enablement. They're hiring for roles that emphasize automation, process documentation, and strategic communication, suggesting they value tools that streamline collaboration without adding complexity.

The day-to-day users are incredibly diverse. Individual contributors across sales, customer success, marketing, and operations use Loom for training materials, client communication, and internal documentation. Multiple postings reference creating recorded content for onboarding, SOPs, and team enablement. One role specifically mentions creating "self led short form recorded video content (Zoom, Loom, etc)" for revenue enablement, while another asks candidates to submit "1-min intro video (Loom, Vidyard, or Google Drive)." This shows Loom serves as infrastructure for asynchronous communication across the entire organization.

The core pain point is scale. These companies are growing fast and need to "do more with less" while maintaining quality. Phrases like "turn manual processes into streamlined systems," "create accessible internal documentation," and "provide training and guidance to enhance performance" appear repeatedly. Teams want to capture knowledge, train globally distributed workforces, and communicate complex ideas without endless meetings. Loom solves the challenge of maintaining human connection and clarity while operating at startup speed.

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 280 companies that use Loom

I noticed something striking about companies using Loom: they're building for builders. The presence of Docker Business and developer experience tools like DX tells me these are engineering-forward organizations that have moved beyond basic tooling into specialized infrastructure for technical teams.

The combination of Loom with Glean and Golinks is particularly revealing. These companies are wrestling with internal knowledge management at scale. Glean indexes across all your company's apps to make information searchable, while Golinks creates memorable shortcuts to frequently accessed resources. When you add Loom to this mix, it suggests teams are trying to preserve institutional knowledge through async video. They're documenting processes, explaining technical decisions, and onboarding new hires without requiring everyone to be online simultaneously. The Zapier Enterprise pairing reinforces this: they're automating workflows across dozens of SaaS tools, which means they've grown complex enough to need serious integration infrastructure.

My analysis shows these are likely mid-stage, product-led companies, probably with distributed or remote-first teams. The emphasis on async communication tools, developer productivity platforms, and knowledge management suggests they've hit that inflection point where tribal knowledge and Slack threads no longer scale. They're not early startups cobbling together free tools, nor are they enterprise giants with custom-built everything. They're in that challenging middle phase where maintaining velocity requires intentional investment in internal operations.

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 280 companies that use Loom

I noticed that Loom's customers span an incredibly diverse range of industries, but they share a common thread: they build complex products or manage intricate operations that require significant internal coordination. These aren't simple businesses. I'm seeing software platforms serving specialized markets (clinical trials, construction management, freight logistics), professional services firms (travel agencies, financial advisors, digital agencies), and companies managing multi-location operations (casinos, banks, retail). What strikes me is how many describe themselves as operating in "complex" spaces or serving "sophisticated" needs.

These are predominantly growth-stage and established companies. The employee counts cluster heavily in the 51-500 range, with significant representation from 500-5,000 employee organizations. I'm seeing Series B through Series E funding rounds, private equity ownership, and even some post-IPO companies. Very few are tiny startups. The funding amounts are substantial: $50M, $100M, $180M rounds appearing frequently.