Companies that use Jedox

Source: Analysis of 100 job postings that mention Jedox

My analysis shows that Jedox is purchased primarily by finance leadership. Directors of Finance represent 16% of roles, Controllers 10%, and various Head of Finance or FP&A positions another 8%. These buyers are focused on financial planning transformation, seeking to modernize legacy systems and create integrated planning capabilities. They're hiring for both strategic oversight and technical implementation expertise, indicating Jedox requires dedicated resources to maximize value.

The day-to-day users span financial analysts (9%) and data analysts (7%), plus business intelligence specialists and controllers who build models, manage data flows, and create reports. These practitioners work extensively with budget consolidation, forecast preparation, management reporting, and KPI tracking. Several postings mention maintaining Jedox alongside other tools like SAP, Oracle, or Power BI, suggesting it serves as a specialized planning layer within broader financial technology stacks.

The recurring pain points center on planning process maturity and system modernization. Companies seek to move from spreadsheets to scalable platforms, with phrases like "development and implementation of a digital controlling and consolidation tool" and "lead the implementation of Jedox focusing on Scorecards, Monthly Contribution Margin Reporting" appearing frequently. Organizations want "fact-based decision-making," "transparent financial reporting," and the ability to support rapid growth through "rolling forecasts" and "scenario planning." The emphasis on process optimization and training suggests Jedox adoption requires organizational change management, not just software installation.

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 506 companies that use Jedox

I noticed that Jedox users tend to be large, operationally mature enterprises focused on procurement, supplier management, and IT infrastructure optimization. The presence of tools like Coupa (procurement) and Ecovadis (supplier sustainability ratings) tells me these are companies managing complex supply chains with formal vendor evaluation processes. They're not startups moving fast and breaking things. They're established organizations balancing efficiency, compliance, and strategic planning.

The pairing of Jedox with Coupa makes perfect sense because both serve finance and procurement teams building sophisticated planning models. If you're using Coupa to manage spend, you need a planning tool like Jedox to forecast budgets and model procurement scenarios. Similarly, Ecovadis appearing alongside Jedox suggests these companies integrate sustainability metrics into their financial planning, which is typical of larger corporations with ESG reporting requirements. The Miro correlation is particularly interesting because it shows these enterprises haven't abandoned collaborative innovation entirely. They're using visual collaboration tools to work through complex planning scenarios, likely in cross-functional workshops where finance teams model outcomes with stakeholders.

The full stack reveals these are IT-led or finance-led organizations in the growth or mature stage. Tools like Tanium and NexThink focus on endpoint management and IT operations analytics, indicating substantial IT complexity. These aren't product-led companies obsessing over user activation metrics. They're operations-focused enterprises trying to gain visibility into sprawling technology estates and supply chains while maintaining governance and control.

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 506 companies that use Jedox

I analyzed these companies and found that Jedox serves established businesses doing tangible, operational work. These aren't software startups or digital agencies. They're manufacturing dental equipment, running grocery stores, producing food and beverages, operating utilities, managing logistics fleets, mining resources, and providing healthcare. They make physical products, move goods, generate power, and deliver essential services that require complex operations across multiple locations.

These are mature, mid-to-large enterprises. The employee counts cluster heavily in the 200 to 5,000 range, with many running multiple facilities or locations. Several mention being family businesses now in their second or third generation of leadership. They reference decades of operation, extensive infrastructure, and established customer bases. Very few show venture funding, and those that do are typically post-IPO. The signals point to companies with complex organizational structures, established processes, and significant operational scale.