Companies that use Halopsa

Source: Analysis of 100 job postings that mention Halopsa

I noticed that while only 6% of the postings are leadership roles like Director of IT Operations or Director of Service Desk Support, these are likely the buyers making HaloPSA purchasing decisions. These leaders oversee large support operations (managing 100+ analysts in one case, or 1,500-user environments) and prioritize operational excellence, SLA enforcement, and scalable infrastructure. Their strategic focus centers on ticket lifecycle management, service delivery optimization, and team performance metrics.

The vast majority (94%) are individual contributors who use HaloPSA daily. IT Support Specialists, Service Desk Engineers, NOC/SOC Analysts, and Service Coordinators rely on it for ticket management, time tracking, dispatch coordination, and documentation. I found these practitioners handle everything from basic password resets to complex escalations, always documenting their work in HaloPSA with clear descriptions and resolution steps. Service Coordinators specifically use it to monitor dispatch boards, forecast workloads, and ensure SLA compliance across internal and field resources.

The pain points revolve around efficiency and accountability. Companies want to eliminate bottlenecks, close knowledge gaps, and reduce revenue leakage. One MSP emphasizes helping clients stop revenue leakage and automate billing, while another seeks to ensure clients are charging for every service they provide. Multiple postings stress proper documentation and accurate time entry, with one explicitly requiring proper documentation of all work in HaloPSA with clear descriptions. The underlying goal is operational transparency and maximizing billable resource utilization.

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 1,081 companies that use Halopsa

I analyzed the tech stack patterns and found that Halopsa users are overwhelmingly managed service providers (MSPs) and IT service companies. The extremely high correlation with tools like Syncro, Datto PSA, and Connectwise Manage (all competing PSA platforms) tells me these companies are shopping around or migrating between professional services automation tools. They're running client-focused IT businesses that need to track tickets, manage projects, and bill for their services.

The pairing with Hudu is particularly revealing since it's a documentation platform built specifically for MSPs to manage client IT environments. This suggests Halopsa customers are mature enough to prioritize knowledge management and standardized documentation practices. The strong presence of Intune and Azure Remote Desktop confirms these companies manage Microsoft-heavy client environments remotely. They're not just fixing computers in an office, they're remotely administering entire fleets of devices for multiple clients simultaneously. The combination of a PSA tool, remote management capabilities, and documentation systems creates a complete workflow for delivering white-glove IT support at scale.

The full stack reveals these are service-delivery focused companies rather than product or marketing operations. They're likely sales-led in the sense that they grow through local relationships and client referrals, but their daily operations center on service delivery efficiency. Most appear to be small to mid-sized MSPs, probably between 5 and 50 employees, who have grown past using spreadsheets but still need affordable, purpose-built tools. They're not enterprise-scale yet, which is why they're choosing platforms in Halopsa's tier rather than enterprise PSA solutions.

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 1,081 companies that use Halopsa

I analyzed these companies and found that Halopsa's typical user is a managed service provider (MSP) or IT services company serving small to medium-sized businesses. These aren't software companies building products. They're service businesses that manage other companies' technology infrastructure, providing help desk support, network monitoring, cybersecurity, cloud migrations, and ongoing IT management. Many explicitly position themselves as outsourced IT departments for organizations that can't afford full-time technical staff.

These are predominantly small, established businesses. The employee counts cluster heavily in the 2-10 and 11-50 range, with very few over employees. Many mention founding dates from the 1990s and 2000s, suggesting mature, stable operations rather than high-growth startups. Almost none mention funding rounds or investors. They're profitable service businesses, not venture-backed companies chasing exponential growth.