Companies that use Env0

Source: Analysis of 100 job postings that mention Env0

I noticed that 92% of roles are individual contributors, with DevOps Engineers making up over half of all postings at 54%. The purchasing decision makers appear to be Directors and VPs of Engineering, Infrastructure, and Cloud Operations who are building out platform engineering capabilities. Their strategic priorities center on cloud modernization, infrastructure automation, and creating scalable developer experiences across AWS and Azure environments.

The day-to-day users are primarily DevOps and Site Reliability Engineers who leverage Env0 for managing Terraform deployments and infrastructure as code workflows. I saw repeated emphasis on using Env0 alongside Terraform to provision cloud resources, manage CI/CD pipelines, and automate infrastructure deployment. Multiple postings mentioned managing Terraform deployments through Env0 specifically, indicating it serves as an orchestration and governance layer on top of infrastructure as code.

The core pain points revolve around scaling infrastructure safely while maintaining velocity. Companies want to enable teams to have autonomous environments while minimizing maintenance effort, costs, and risk. One posting captured this perfectly, seeking to make infrastructure as code easy and empowering every dev to have its own environment. Another emphasized the need for consistent standards, patterns, and practices across cloud architecture. Organizations are clearly trying to balance developer autonomy with centralized governance, security, and cost control as they scale their cloud operations.

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 210 companies that use Env0

I noticed that Env0 users are typically fast-moving B2B software companies with sophisticated developer operations and a strong focus on enterprise sales. The combination of infrastructure automation (Env0, Docker Business) alongside enterprise-grade AI tools and B2B marketing platforms tells me these are growth-stage companies selling technical products to other businesses.

The pairing of Env0 with Docker Business makes perfect sense because both companies are managing complex, containerized infrastructure at scale. They need robust environment management across multiple deployment stages. The heavy presence of Golinks is particularly telling. Companies only adopt internal link shorteners when they've reached a certain scale where knowledge management becomes critical, usually 100+ employees with lots of cross-functional collaboration. Meanwhile, PathFactory appearing so frequently suggests these companies run sophisticated content marketing programs targeting technical buyers with long sales cycles. They're creating tons of educational content for developer and DevOps audiences.

The full picture reveals these are definitively sales-led and marketing-led B2B companies, not product-led. PathFactory, Anecdotes.ai, and GC.AI Enterprise are all tools designed to support complex enterprise sales motions with multiple stakeholders. These companies likely have average contract values in the tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars. The presence of Bitrise (mobile CI/CD) suggests many are building modern SaaS products with mobile components. I'd estimate most are Series B to D companies with 100 to 500 employees, past the scrappy startup phase but still scaling rapidly.

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 210 companies that use Env0

I noticed that Env0's customers are predominantly technology-forward companies building digital infrastructure that others depend on. These aren't just tech companies in name. They're creating cybersecurity platforms (Wiz, Zscaler, Varonis), financial services infrastructure (PayPal, Pleo, Melio), developer tools (MongoDB, JFrog, Framer), and enterprise software systems. Even the non-tech companies like AB InBev and Medtronic position themselves as technology organizations transforming their industries. The common thread is that these companies are platform builders and infrastructure providers, not end-consumer product companies.

These are predominantly growth-stage and mature companies, not early startups. I see many Series D and beyond funding rounds, numerous post-IPO companies, and employee counts frequently in the 1,000 to 10,000 range. The average appears to be established companies with substantial revenue and complex technical infrastructure. Even the smaller companies tend to be well-funded Series A or B with significant backing from major investors.