We detected 1,572 companies using Cursor in a Open Source Repo. The most common industry is Software Development (42%) and the most common company size is 2-10 employees (47%). We find new customers by discovering URLs with known URL patterns through web crawling or modifications to subprocessor lists.
Note: We only track companies with open-source Github repos that use Cursor. We track all companies using the advanced plan of Cursor here
👥 What types of companies use Cursor in a Open Source Repo?
Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 1,572 companies that use Cursor in a Open Source Repo
I noticed these companies span an incredibly diverse range of what they actually build and sell. There's a strong presence of software development shops and IT consultancies building custom solutions for clients (7Span, Acueducto, Boldare), blockchain and Web3 infrastructure providers (1inch Network, Berachain, Akash Network), developer tooling and platforms (Activepieces, Attio, Apollo.io), and AI-focused companies (AiTech, Bahasa.ai, Bayseian). Many are creating technical infrastructure, whether that's data platforms, automation tools, or specialized vertical software.
These are predominantly early to mid-stage companies. The majority have small to medium team sizes (11-50 or 51-200 employees), and many explicitly mention funding rounds (Seed, Series A-D). I saw multiple Y Combinator companies and pre-seed startups alongside a few larger enterprises like Amadeus with 10,000+ employees. The funding stages range from bootstrapped to Series D, but most cluster in the Seed to Series B range, suggesting growth-stage companies actively scaling.
🔧 What other technologies do Cursor in a Open Source Repo customers also use?
Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 1,572 companies that use Cursor in a Open Source Repo
Commonly Paired Technologies
i
Shows how much more likely Cursor in a Open Source Repo customers are to use each tool compared to the general population. For example, 287x means customers are 287 times more likely to use that tool.
I noticed that companies using Cursor in open source repositories are distinctly engineering-first organizations that have embraced AI-assisted development as a core competency. The presence of Claude Code appearing 3,129 times more frequently tells me these are teams that have gone all-in on AI coding tools, not just dabbling. Combined with incident management and operational tools, this suggests venture-backed startups building technical products where engineering velocity is a competitive advantage.
The pairing of Cursor with Incident.io (685 times more likely) is particularly revealing. These companies are shipping code fast enough that they need sophisticated incident management, which means they're running production systems at scale with real users. The appearance of Pylon, a customer support tool for technical products, reinforces this. They're building for developers or technical audiences who expect both rapid iteration and high reliability. Golinks showing up 401 times more frequently suggests these teams have reached a size where internal knowledge management matters, typically 30-50 people or more, but they're using lightweight tools that don't slow them down.
The full stack reveals product-led growth companies in the Series A to Series B range. They're not using heavy enterprise sales tools. Instead, they're investing in engineering productivity (Cursor, Claude Code), operational excellence (Incident.io, Panther for security monitoring), and developer experience. These companies likely offer API-first products or developer tools themselves, which explains why they maintain active open source repositories. They understand their buyers are technical and will evaluate their engineering practices.
Alternatives and Competitors to Cursor in a Open Source Repo
Explore vendors that are alternatives in this category