Companies that use Cisco Secure Client

Source: Analysis of 100 job postings that mention Cisco Secure Client

I noticed that Cisco Secure Client is purchased and deployed primarily by technical teams rather than executive leadership. Network Engineers comprise 41% of hiring, followed by IT Support Specialists at 18%, Network Administrators at 14%, and Information Security Engineers at 9%. These organizations are prioritizing network access control, zero trust security implementations, and secure remote access as strategic imperatives. Buying decisions appear to come from IT Infrastructure, Network Services, and Security Engineering departments focused on modernizing authentication and endpoint security.

The day-to-day users are hands-on technical practitioners managing authentication, VPN access, and network security policies. They configure and troubleshoot Cisco Secure Client alongside Cisco ISE for network access control, implement 802.1x authentication for wired and wireless devices, and manage remote access for distributed workforces. These practitioners integrate the client with Active Directory, Azure AD, and TACACS+ systems while maintaining compliance with security standards like DISA STIGs.

The core challenges revolve around implementing zero trust frameworks and securing hybrid environments. Companies describe needing to "protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of on-prem networks" and seeking professionals who can "implement cutting-edge technology and a strong understanding of Zero Trust principles." Multiple postings emphasize "secure and reliable communications" and the need to "simplify identity management across diverse devices and applications," revealing that organizations are consolidating security tools while supporting increasingly complex, multi-vendor network environments.

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 8,925 companies that use Cisco Secure Client

I noticed that companies using Cisco Secure Client are overwhelmingly enterprise organizations with mature security postures and complex IT infrastructures. The presence of tools like ServiceNow, Microsoft Defender for Business, and Azure DevOps tells me these are large companies that have moved beyond basic security and invested heavily in enterprise-grade systems. This isn't the tech stack of a startup or mid-market company. These are organizations that value comprehensive security ecosystems and have the resources to implement them.

The correlation with Webex being 32 times more likely is particularly revealing. These companies aren't just buying point solutions, they're buying into the Cisco ecosystem. When I see Cisco Secure Client alongside Cisco Duo and Cisco Email Security, it shows a deliberate vendor consolidation strategy. These companies prefer integrated security suites from trusted enterprise vendors rather than stitching together best-of-breed tools. The pairing with Azure DevOps suggests these are companies with substantial development teams who need secure remote access to corporate resources. The ServiceNow correlation reinforces this enterprise profile, as it indicates formal IT service management processes and likely thousands of employees.

The full stack reveals these are definitively sales-led organizations operating with traditional enterprise buying processes. They have procurement teams, vendor management programs, and likely multi-year contracts. These companies are past the growth stage and in consolidation or optimization mode. They're not experimenting with new technologies, they're standardizing on proven platforms.

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 8,925 companies that use Cisco Secure Client

I noticed that Cisco Secure Client users span an remarkably diverse range of operations, but they share a common thread: they handle sensitive information or critical infrastructure. These organizations include financial services firms managing transactions and investments, healthcare providers operating hospitals and rehabilitation centers, government entities from local municipalities to defense organizations, construction companies overseeing major projects, and IT service providers protecting client data. Manufacturing plants, agricultural distributors, educational institutions, and even cultural organizations appear in the mix. What unites them is not their industry but their operational complexity and data sensitivity.

These are predominantly established, mature organizations. The employee counts skew heavily toward 50 to 5,000+ employees, with many in government, healthcare, and large enterprises. Very few are early-stage startups. I noticed significant representation from publicly funded entities, family-owned businesses with multi-generational histories, and subsidiaries of larger corporations. The funding data, where present, shows late-stage or post-IPO companies rather than seed or Series A ventures. This suggests organizations that have moved beyond startup chaos into operational maturity.