Companies that use Secureframe

Source: Analysis of 100 job postings that mention Secureframe

I noticed that Secureframe is purchased primarily by mid-level security and compliance leaders, specifically GRC Managers, IT Security Leads, and Compliance Directors. These buyers are focused on achieving SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001 certifications as table stakes for enterprise deals. Their strategic priority is audit readiness without slowing down business velocity. One posting emphasized being "audit-ready" while another sought someone to ensure "compliance is not just a checkbox, but a foundation for trust and efficiency."

Day-to-day users are primarily Security Compliance Analysts, GRC Analysts, and junior security engineers who spend their time collecting evidence, managing control testing, and responding to customer security questionnaires. These practitioners use Secureframe to automate evidence collection, track remediation tasks, and maintain continuous compliance. Multiple postings mentioned managing tools like Secureframe alongside Vanta or Drata to "ensure continuous compliance" and "automate SOC 2 compliance."

The core pain point I see is scaling compliance without adding headcount. Companies want to "pass audits" and "respond to customer security questionnaires" efficiently while maintaining "scalable and efficient processes." Fast-growing startups and Series B companies repeatedly emphasize needing compliance that moves at startup speed. One role specifically called for "implementing technical controls" while another needed someone to "build audit-ready programs" that support rapid growth from 200 to 400+ employees.

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 325 companies that use Secureframe

I noticed that Secureframe users are fast-growing B2B SaaS companies that are scaling rapidly and need compliance certification to close enterprise deals. The presence of tools like Quotapath for sales compensation and Chili Piper for meeting scheduling tells me these companies have substantial sales teams actively pursuing larger customers who demand SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certification. They're revenue-focused operations that need security frameworks to unlock bigger contracts.

The pairing of Secureframe with Posthog Enterprise and Statsig is particularly revealing. These are sophisticated product analytics and feature flagging tools that suggest data-driven product development teams. Companies using this combination are likely product-led organizations that also need compliance frameworks as they move upmarket. Cursor appearing so frequently alongside Secureframe indicates these companies employ engineering teams that prioritize velocity and modern tooling. Meanwhile, Atlassian StatusPage makes perfect sense because companies serious about compliance also need transparent uptime communication for enterprise customers.

The full stack reveals companies in that crucial transition phase from product-led growth to enterprise sales. They've achieved product-market fit and are now scaling their go-to-market motion to capture larger accounts. The combination of advanced developer tools, product analytics, and sales enablement software suggests Series A through Series C companies with 50-200 employees. They're building for technical buyers but increasingly need to satisfy security and procurement teams at larger organizations.

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 325 companies that use Secureframe

I analyzed these companies and found that Secureframe's typical customer is a B2B software or technology company serving enterprise clients or regulated industries. These aren't consumer apps. They build platforms, tools, and infrastructure that other businesses depend on: CRM systems, data integration platforms, AI agents, compliance software, healthcare IT, financial services technology, and specialized vertical SaaS solutions. They're selling into environments where security questionnaires and compliance certifications are table stakes for closing deals.

These are predominantly growth-stage companies, not early startups or massive enterprises. The employee counts cluster heavily in the 11-200 range. Many have raised Series A or seed funding, with rounds typically between $3M and $20M. A significant portion have no disclosed funding at all, suggesting bootstrapped profitability. They're past the pure product-market fit stage but not yet at IPO scale. They're in that critical phase where they're winning larger enterprise customers who demand security certifications.