Companies that use Reo.dev

Based on an analysis of Linkedin bios of random companies that use Reo.dev

I analyzed these 100 companies and found that Reo.dev's typical customer is building developer tools and infrastructure software. These aren't consumer apps or traditional SaaS products. They're creating platforms, APIs, SDKs, and open-source projects that other developers use to build applications. Think database companies like RavenDB and Dragonfly, observability platforms like SigNoz and Netdata, AI infrastructure like LangChain and Weights & Biases, and development tools like Pulumi and Nx.

The language these companies use reveals a clear pattern. They emphasize being "open-source" (mentioned constantly), "developer-first," and built "for developers" or "by developers." They describe themselves as "enterprise-grade" while remaining "easy to use" or offering a "simple" developer experience. Phrases like "build faster," "ship confidently," and "production-ready" appear repeatedly. Companies position themselves as letting teams "focus on building" rather than managing infrastructure, promising to eliminate "complexity" and "manual work."

These are predominantly early to mid-stage venture-backed companies. The majority are Series A or Seed stage, with funding rounds between $3M and $30M. Many have 11-50 employees, with some scaling to 51-200. A significant portion are Y Combinator backed. They're past the initial product-market fit stage but still actively building and haven't reached mature enterprise scale. The few larger companies (200+ employees) tend to be established open-source leaders like Chainguard or Aerospike.

A salesperson should understand that these customers are selling to developers, which means the buyers are technical and skeptical of marketing. They value transparency, open-source credibility, and hands-on product experience. These companies operate in competitive, fast-moving markets where developer experience and time-to-value are critical differentiators. They're scaling their engineering teams and likely dealing with growing pains around infrastructure, security, and operational complexity. They need tools that developers will actually adopt, not enterprise software that requires extensive training.

Based on an analysis of tech stacks from companies that use Reo.dev

I noticed that Reo.dev users are clearly B2B companies focused on product-led growth with sophisticated go-to-market operations. The presence of Common Room and Koala together reveals these companies are obsessed with understanding buying signals from product usage and community engagement. They're not doing traditional cold outreach. Instead, they're tracking which prospects are actually engaging with their content, joining their communities, and showing real intent.

The pairing of Vanta and Incident.io is particularly telling. These companies are selling to enterprise customers who care deeply about security and reliability. Vanta automates compliance certifications like SOC 2, while Incident.io manages on-call rotations and incident response. This combination suggests they're building trust through transparency and operational excellence, not just features. Meanwhile, tools like RB2B and Vector.co show they're identifying website visitors and tracking account-level engagement, which means they're running account-based strategies where sales teams get alerts when target accounts show interest.

My analysis shows these are likely Series A to Series B startups in the 50 to 200 employee range. They've moved past founder-led sales but haven't built massive sales teams yet. Instead, they're investing heavily in the infrastructure that lets smaller teams punch above their weight. They're product-led in acquisition but sales-assisted in conversion, using all this tooling to know exactly when a prospect is ready for a human conversation. The emphasis on community tools and intent data over traditional martech suggests they believe in earning attention rather than buying it.

A salesperson approaching Reo.dev customers should understand they're talking to sophisticated operators who already use multiple specialized tools. These buyers value integration capabilities and expect vendors to understand modern go-to-market strategies. They're not looking for all-in-one solutions. They want best-of-breed tools that work together seamlessly.