We detected 2,178 customers using Posthog Feature Flags. The most common industry is Software Development (24%) and the most common company size is 11-50 employees (40%). Our methodology involves detecting live technical signals.
Note: We detect companies that turned on features flags in their Posthog instance. We are also unable to detect churned customers for this vendor, only new customers
About Posthog Feature Flags
Posthog Feature Flags enables engineering teams to deploy new features confidently and control rollouts through conditional feature toggles that can target specific user cohorts, support gradual percentage-based rollouts, and integrate with analytics to measure impact and run experiments.
🔧 What other technologies do Posthog Feature Flags customers also use?
Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 2,178 companies that use Posthog Feature Flags
Commonly Paired Technologies
i
Shows how much more likely Posthog Feature Flags customers are to use each tool compared to the general population. For example, 287x means customers are 287 times more likely to use that tool.
I noticed something striking about companies using Posthog Feature Flags: they're all-in on the Posthog ecosystem. These aren't companies casually testing a single tool. They're building their entire product intelligence infrastructure around one platform, with the vast majority also using Posthog's surveys, heatmaps, and session recording capabilities. This tells me they value having a unified view of user behavior rather than stitching together data from multiple vendors.
The pairing that jumps out most is Feature Flags combined with Session Recording. This makes perfect sense for a specific workflow: deploy a new feature behind a flag, watch actual user sessions to see how people interact with it, then decide whether to roll it out broadly or kill it. Add in Heatmaps and you get even more granular insight into what's working. The high adoption of User Surveys alongside Feature Flags suggests these companies validate changes by collecting direct feedback, not just inferring from metrics. They're running tight experimentation loops.
My analysis shows these are clearly product-led companies, likely in growth stage rather than early startup or mature enterprise. They care deeply about shipping fast while minimizing risk, which is exactly what feature flags enable. The fact that relatively few use Posthog Enterprise (only 81 companies) suggests most are mid-market rather than large corporations. These teams are probably engineering-driven, making rapid iteration decisions based on real user data rather than waiting for lengthy sales cycles or executive approval.
👥 What types of companies is most likely to use Posthog Feature Flags?
Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 2,178 companies that use Posthog Feature Flags
Company Characteristics
i
Shows how much more likely Posthog Feature Flags customers are to have each trait compared to all companies. For example, 2.0x means customers are twice as likely to have that characteristic.
Trait
Likelihood
Funding Stage: Pre seed
55.7x
Funding Stage: Series B
43.1x
Funding Stage: Seed
38.0x
Industry: Software Development
12.8x
Industry: Technology, Information and Internet
12.8x
Industry: Technology, Information and Media
9.3x
I noticed that Posthog Feature Flags users are predominantly building software products, but not in the traditional enterprise sense. These companies are creating consumer-facing platforms, marketplaces, and SaaS tools across diverse verticals. They build AI agents for sales and support, mobile app paywalls, cross-border payment infrastructure, online learning platforms, and digital healthcare services. Many are tech-enabled versions of traditional businesses: real estate lead generation, accounting automation, pet care subscriptions, visa applications. The common thread is they're all shipping digital products that need continuous iteration and testing.
Most of these companies are in early to mid-stage growth. I counted numerous pre-seed and seed stage startups with funding rounds between $500K and $10M, typically with teams of 2-50 employees. There are some scaling companies in the 50-200 employee range with Series A or B funding, but very few mature enterprises. The Y Combinator badges, "backed by" language, and frequent mention of being founded in the last 5 years all signal this is primarily a startup and scale-up tool.
Alternatives and Competitors to Posthog Feature Flags
Explore vendors that are alternatives in this category