Companies that use Posthog Feature Flags

Analyzed and validated by Henley Wing Chiu
All feature management and feature flags Posthog Feature Flags

Posthog Feature Flags We detected 2,284 customers using Posthog Feature Flags. The most common industry is Software Development (24%) and the most common company size is 11-50 employees (40%). We find new customers by detecting live technical signals. Note: We detect companies that turned on features flags in their Posthog instance

⏱️ Data is delayed by 1 month. To show real-time data, sign up for a free trial or login
Company Employees Industry Region YoY Headcount Growth Usage Start Date
Hanbit Media | 한빛미디어 51–200 Book and Periodical Publishing KR +4.3% 2026-01-20
Aftershoot 51–200 Software Development US +27.1% 2026-01-20
Flint AI 2–10 Technology, Information and Media N/A N/A 2026-01-20
Smart Bricks 11–50 Technology, Information and Internet US +2600% 2026-01-19
fonio.ai 11–50 Telecommunications AT +57.1% 2026-01-19
Bookshop.org 11–50 Retail US +12.1% 2026-01-18
Bali Love (PT. Bali Cinta Weddings) 11–50 Events Services ID N/A 2026-01-18
Conduit Health 11–50 Hospitals and Health Care US +43.8% 2026-01-17
Baader Bank AG 501–1,000 Financial Services DE N/A 2026-01-17
Vedio 2–10 Media Production DK +13.2% 2026-01-16
YouCloud Paytech 11–50 IT Services and IT Consulting AE -4.8% 2026-01-15
Aident AI 2–10 Technology, Information and Internet US +8.3% 2026-01-15
PalletBiz 201–500 Packaging and Containers Manufacturing HU N/A 2026-01-15
Typa (YC S24) 2–10 Technology, Information and Internet US +33.3% 2026-01-14
Graphice 2–10 Graphic Design CH +9.1% 2026-01-14
AMG Realtors 51–200 Real Estate KE +5% 2026-01-14
St Giles International 201–500 Higher Education GB -3.1% 2026-01-13
Tendersight 11–50 Technology, Information and Internet US N/A 2026-01-13
Tubelite Centroamérica 51–200 Retail GT N/A 2026-01-13
Showing 1-20 of 2,284

Market Insights

🏢 Top Industries

Software Development 487 (24%)
Technology, Information and Internet 346 (17%)
Retail 103 (5%)
Financial Services 102 (5%)
IT Services and IT Consulting 75 (4%)

📏 Company Size Distribution

11-50 employees 884 (40%)
2-10 employees 678 (30%)
51-200 employees 431 (19%)
201-500 employees 131 (6%)
1,001-5,000 employees 42 (2%)

👥 What types of companies is most likely to use Posthog Feature Flags?

Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 2,284 companies that use Posthog Feature Flags

Company Characteristics
i
Trait
Likelihood
Funding Stage: Pre seed
55.7x
Funding Stage: Series B
43.1x
Funding Stage: Seed
38.0x
Industry: Software Development
12.8x
Industry: Technology, Information and Internet
12.8x
Industry: Technology, Information and Media
9.3x
I noticed that Posthog Feature Flags users are predominantly building software products, but not in the traditional enterprise sense. These companies are creating consumer-facing platforms, marketplaces, and SaaS tools across diverse verticals. They build AI agents for sales and support, mobile app paywalls, cross-border payment infrastructure, online learning platforms, and digital healthcare services. Many are tech-enabled versions of traditional businesses: real estate lead generation, accounting automation, pet care subscriptions, visa applications. The common thread is they're all shipping digital products that need continuous iteration and testing.

Most of these companies are in early to mid-stage growth. I counted numerous pre-seed and seed stage startups with funding rounds between $500K and $10M, typically with teams of 2-50 employees. There are some scaling companies in the 50-200 employee range with Series A or B funding, but very few mature enterprises. The Y Combinator badges, "backed by" language, and frequent mention of being founded in the last 5 years all signal this is primarily a startup and scale-up tool.

🔧 What other technologies do Posthog Feature Flags customers also use?

Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 2,284 companies that use Posthog Feature Flags

Commonly Paired Technologies
i
Technology
Likelihood
3584.7x
1253.8x
1113.1x
1080.9x
1079.7x
496.6x
I noticed something striking about companies using Posthog Feature Flags: they're all-in on the Posthog ecosystem. These aren't companies casually testing a single tool. They're building their entire product intelligence infrastructure around one platform, with the vast majority also using Posthog's surveys, heatmaps, and session recording capabilities. This tells me they value having a unified view of user behavior rather than stitching together data from multiple vendors.

The pairing that jumps out most is Feature Flags combined with Session Recording. This makes perfect sense for a specific workflow: deploy a new feature behind a flag, watch actual user sessions to see how people interact with it, then decide whether to roll it out broadly or kill it. Add in Heatmaps and you get even more granular insight into what's working. The high adoption of User Surveys alongside Feature Flags suggests these companies validate changes by collecting direct feedback, not just inferring from metrics. They're running tight experimentation loops.

My analysis shows these are clearly product-led companies, likely in growth stage rather than early startup or mature enterprise. They care deeply about shipping fast while minimizing risk, which is exactly what feature flags enable. The fact that relatively few use Posthog Enterprise (only 81 companies) suggests most are mid-market rather than large corporations. These teams are probably engineering-driven, making rapid iteration decisions based on real user data rather than waiting for lengthy sales cycles or executive approval.

Alternatives and Competitors to Posthog Feature Flags

Explore vendors that are alternatives in this category

Harness Feature Management Harness Feature Management LaunchDarkly LaunchDarkly ConfigCat ConfigCat Statsig Statsig

Loading data...