We detected 1,245 companies using Mandiant. The most common industry is Financial Services (11%) and the most common company size is 1,001-5,000 employees (20%). We find new customers by monitoring new entries and modifications to company DNS records.
Note: We detect companies that enabled Mandiant Deep Threat Monitoring
📊 Who usually uses Mandiant and for what use cases?
Source: Analysis of job postings that mention Mandiant (using the Bloomberry Jobs API)
Job titles that mention Mandiant
i
Based on an analysis of job titles from postings that mention Mandiant.
Job Title
Share
SOC Analyst
23%
Security Engineer
20%
Threat Intelligence Analyst
17%
Cybersecurity Manager
13%
My analysis shows that Mandiant purchases are driven primarily by senior security leaders including CISOs, Directors of Cybersecurity Operations (13%), and Heads of Information Security Services (9%). These buyers are hiring across three core areas: SOC operations (23%), security engineering (20%), and threat intelligence (17%). Their strategic priorities center on proactive threat detection, incident response capabilities, and integration with cloud security platforms. I noticed leadership roles emphasize building 24/7 security operations centers and implementing breach simulation capabilities.
The day-to-day users are predominantly SOC analysts and security engineers who leverage Mandiant for threat hunting, incident response, and validation of security controls. Practitioners use Mandiant tools like HX for endpoint analysis, MVX for malware detection, and Threat Intelligence feeds to identify indicators of compromise. I found that users are tasked with "conducting hypothesis-based threat hunts," "analyzing security logs and alerts," and "executing automated validation campaigns" across enterprise environments. The platform supports integration with SIEM, SOAR, and EDR tools to create comprehensive detection workflows.
Companies are solving critical pain points around "proactively identifying and detecting sophisticated threat actors," "reducing time to detect and respond," and "validating detection capabilities and security stack effectiveness." One posting emphasized the need to "translate complex technical findings into actionable insights" while another sought to "identify blind spots and improve control resiliency." Organizations want to move from reactive to proactive defense through continuous threat hunting and automated breach simulations that test their security posture against real-world attack scenarios.
👥 What types of companies use Mandiant?
Source: Analysis of Linkedin bios of 1,245 companies that use Mandiant
I noticed Mandiant's customers are overwhelmingly large, established organizations operating critical infrastructure and services that people depend on daily. These are companies running telecommunications networks, processing financial transactions, manufacturing essential products, delivering healthcare, and managing energy resources. They're not selling novelty items or experimental services. They're the companies keeping economies running: banks processing millions of transactions, retailers employing tens of thousands, manufacturers supplying global markets, and government agencies serving entire populations.
These are definitively mature enterprises. The average company here employs thousands, often tens of thousands of people. Many are publicly traded with post-IPO funding stages. Several have century-long histories (Caterpillar mentions years, Samsung has operated since 1969, Western Union references a 200-year heritage). Even younger companies like Wise and QuintoAndar have reached massive scale with millions of customers. The presence of government agencies, central banks, and Fortune 500 companies reinforces this pattern.
🔧 What other technologies do Mandiant customers also use?
Source: Analysis of tech stacks from 1,245 companies that use Mandiant
Commonly Paired Technologies
i
Shows how much more likely Mandiant customers are to use each tool compared to the general population. For example, 287x means customers are 287 times more likely to use that tool.
I noticed that Mandiant customers are large, mature enterprises with sophisticated digital workflows and complex security needs. The extraordinarily high correlation with Google Security Operations (858x more likely) immediately signals that these are organizations taking security seriously enough to deploy multiple advanced threat detection and response platforms. The presence of Adobe Enterprise and Docusign's enterprise agreement management solution tells me these companies handle sensitive documents and contracts at scale, likely dealing with regulated data or high-value intellectual property.
The pairing of Docker Business with Mandiant makes perfect sense. Companies running containerized applications need advanced security monitoring because containers create complex, dynamic environments where threats can spread quickly. Similarly, the Figma Organization Plan and Miro combination suggests these are companies with large design and product teams collaborating on digital initiatives. When you're building significant software products or digital experiences, you become a much more attractive target for sophisticated attacks, which is exactly what Mandiant defends against.
Looking at the full stack, these companies appear to be in growth or mature stages rather than early startup phase. The enterprise-tier tools across the board (Adobe Enterprise, Docker Business, Figma Organization) require substantial budgets. They're likely product-led or hybrid organizations given the emphasis on development and design tools, but they're operating at a scale where security can't be an afterthought. These aren't scrappy startups testing ideas. They're organizations with valuable assets, established customer bases, and regulatory obligations.
Alternatives and Competitors to Mandiant
Explore vendors that are alternatives in this category